BrownLCGreenhalghRMPowellJT.
Use of baseline factors to predict complications and
reinterventions after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic
aneurysm. Br J Surg.2010;97:1207–1217.
Erratum in: Br J Surg. 2011;98:162.
3.
BarnesMBoultMMaddernG.
A model to predict outcomes for endovascular aneurysm repair
using preoperative variables. Eur J Vasc Endovasc
Surg.2008;35:571–579.
AbediNNDavenportDLXenosE.
Gender and 30-day outcome in patients undergoing endovascular
aneurysm repair (EVAR): an analysis using the ACS NSQIP
dataset. J Vasc Surg.2009;50:486–491.e4.
6.
CohenMEBilimoriaKYKoCY.
Effect of subjective preoperative variables on risk-adjusted
assessment of hospital morbidity and mortality. Ann
Surg.2009;249:682–689.
WalshSRTangTSadatU.
Preoperative glomerular filtration rate and outcome following
open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Vasc
Endovascular Surg.2007;41:225–259.
9.
AzzizadehASanchezLAMillerCC.
Glomerular filtration rate is a predictor of mortality after
endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J
Vasc Surg.2006;43:14–18.
10.
TangTWalshSRPrytherchDR.
VBHOM, a data economic model for predicting the outcome after
open abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery. Br J
Surg.2007;94:717–721.
11.
WaasdorpEJVriesJPHoboR.
aneurysm diameter and proximal aortic neck diameter influence
clinical outcome of endovascular abdominal aortic repair: a 4-year EUROSTAR
experience. Ann Vasc Surg.2005;19:755–761.
12.
JimJRubinBGGeraghtyPJ.
A 5-year comparison of EVAR for large and small aortic
necks. J Endovasc Ther.2010;17:575–584.
13.
LeursLJKievitJDagneliePC.
Influence of infrarenal neck length on outcome of
endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J
Endovasc Ther.2006;13:640–648.
14.
AbuRahmaAFCampbellJStonePA.
The correlation of aortic neck length to early and late
outcomes in endovascular aneurysm repair patients. J
Vasc Surg.2009;50:738–748.
15.
BrownLCGreenhalghRMKwongGP.
Secondary interventions and mortality following endovascular
aortic aneurysm repair: device-specific results from the UK EVAR
trials. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg.2007;34:281–290.
16.
NooraniACooperDGWalshSR.
Comparison of aortomonoiliac endovascular aneurysm repair
versus a bifurcated stent-graft: analysis of perioperative morbidity and
mortality. J Endovasc Ther.2009;16:295–301.
17.
ThomasBGSanchezLAGeraghtyPJ.
A comparative analysis of the outcomes of aortic cuffs and
converters for endovascular graft migration. J Vasc
Surg.2010;51:1373–1380.
18.
WalshSRBoyleJRLynchAG.
Suprarenal endograft fixation and medium-term renal function:
systematic review and meta-analysis. J Vasc
Surg.2008;47:1364–1370.e1.
19.
OshinOAFisherRKWilliamsLA.
Adjunctive iliac stents reduce the risk of stent-graft limb
occlusion following endovascular aneurysm repair with the Zenith
stent-graft. J Endovasc Ther.2010;17:108–1014.
20.
ScurrJRBrennanJAGilling-SmithGL.
Fenestrated endovascular repair of juxtarenal
aneurysms. Br J Surg.2008;95:326–332.
21.
VerhoevenELVourliotakisGBosWT.
Fenestrated stent grafting for short-necked and juxtarenal
abdominal aortic aneurysm: an 8-year single-centre
experience. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg.2010;39:529–536.
22.
KarthikesalingamAHinchliffeRJHoltPJ.
Endovascular aneurysm repair with preservation of the
internal iliac artery using the iliac branch graft device.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg.2010;39:285–294.
VerziniFParlaniGRomanoL.
endovascular treatment of iliac aneurysm: concurrent
comparison of side branch endograft versus hypogastric
exclusion. J Vasc Surg.2009;49:
1154–1161.
25.
DiasNVReschTASonessonB.
EVAR of aortoiliac aneurysms with branched
stent-grafts. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg.2008;35:677–684.
26.
TrialIMPROVEPowellJTThompsonSG.
The Immediate Management of the Patient with Rupture: Open
Versus Endovascular repair (IMPROVE) aneurysm trial–ISRCTN 48334791
IMPROVE trialists. Acta Chir Belg.2009;109:
678–680.
27.
BoyleJRGibbsPJKingD.
Predicting outcome in ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: a
prospective study of 100 consecutive cases. Eur J
Vasc Endovasc Surg.2003;26:607–611.
28.
UK Small Aneurysm Trial
participants. Final 12-year follow-up of surgery
versus surveillance in the UK Small Aneurysm Trial.
Br J Surg.2007;94:702–708.
29.
United Kingdom EVAR Trial
Investigators, GreenhalghRMBrownLC.
Endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic
aneurysm. N Engl J Med.2010;362:1863–1871.
30.
ConradMFCrawfordRSPedrazaJD.
Long-term durability of open abdominal aortic aneurysm
repair. J Vasc Surg.2007;46:669–675.
31.
WhiteGHYuWMayJ.
Endoleak as a complication of endoluminal grafting of
abdominal aortic aneurysms: classification, incidence, diagnosis, and
management. J Endovasc Surg.1997;4:152–168.
32.
DimickJBOsborneNHHallBL.
Risk adjustment for comparing hospital quality with surgery:
how many variables are needed?J Am Coll Surg.2010;210:503–508.
33.
BarnesMBoultMThompsonMM.
Personalised predictions of endovascular aneurysm repair
success rates: validating the ERA model with UK Vascular Institute
data. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg.2010;40:436–441.
34.
MarkovicJNRajgorDDShortellCK.
The impact of diabetes mellitus and renal insufficiency on
the outcome of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm
repair. Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther.2010;22:235–244.
35.
BoyleJRThompsonMM.
Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair is less
invasive, now we must prove its efficacy. J Endovasc
Ther.2003;10:16–19.