Endovenous Mechanochemical Ablation: How Much Improvement Is Good Enough?

Lurie F Creton D Eklof B . Prospective randomized study of endovenous radiofrequency obliteration (closure procedure) versus ligation and stripping in a selected patient population (EVOLVeS Study). J Vasc Surg. 2003;38:207–214.

van Eekeren RR Boersma D Elias S . Endovenous mechanochemical ablation of great saphenous vein incompetence using the ClariVein device: a safety study. J Endovasc Ther. 2011;18:328–334.

Proebstle TM Alm J Gockeritz O . Three-year European follow-up of endovenous radiofrequency-powered segmental thermal ablation of the great saphenous vein with or without treatment of calf varicosities. J Vasc Surg. 2011; Mar 23. [Epub ahead of print]

Rao RB Ely SF Hoffman RS . Deaths related to liposuction. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:1471–1475.

Pronk P Gauw SA Mooij MC . Randomised controlled trial comparing saphenofemoral ligation and stripping of the great saphenous vein with endovenous laser ablation (980 nm) using local tumescent anaesthesia: one year results. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010;40:649–656.

Srikandarajah S Gilron I . Systematic review of movement-evoked pain versus pain at rest in postsurgical clinical trials and metaanalyses: a fundamental distinction requiring standardized measurement. Pain. 2011; Mar 12 [Epub ahead of print].

Dworkin RH Turk DC Wyrwich KW . Interpreting the clinical importance of treatment outcomes in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. J Pain. 2008;9:105–121.

Doganci S Demirkilic U . Comparison of 980 nm laser and bare-tip fibre with 1470 nm laser and radial fibre in the treatment of great saphenous vein varicosities: a prospective randomised clinical trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010;40:254–259.