The cerebral protection device (CPD) itself may cause complications, including locking between the CPD and other devices, that may result in catastrophic outcomes requiring surgical removal of these locked devices. We describe a case of locking between a CPD and the stent-delivering catheter during carotid artery stenting, which was safely rescued by endovascular retrieval. The mechanism underlying locking with the CPD as well as preventive actions and maneuvers for rescuing the situation are discussed.
CremonesiAManettiRSetacciF. Protected carotid stenting: clinical advantages and complications of embolic protection devices in 442 consecutive patients. Stroke. 2003; 34: 1936–1943. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000081000.23561.61.
2.
GargNKaragiorgosNPisimisisGT. Cerebral protection devices reduce periprocedural strokes during carotid angioplasty and stenting: a systematic review of the current literature. J Endovasc Ther. 2009; 16: 412–427. doi: 10.1583/09-2713.1.
3.
ReimersBCorvajaNMoshiriS. Cerebral protection with filter devices during carotid artery stenting. Circulation. 2001; 104: 12–15. doi: 10.1161/hc2601.092495.
4.
NicosiaANikasDCastriotaF. Classification for carotid artery stenting complications: manifestation, management, and prevention. J Endovasc Ther. 2010; 17: 275–294. doi: 10.1583/09-2943.1.
5.
ShillingKUretskyBFHunterGC. Entrapment of a cerebral embolic protection device—A case report. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2006; 40: 229–233. doi: 10.1177/153857440604000308.
6.
AkgulEAksungurEHKorurK. A rare complication of carotid artery stenting: displacement of marker ring causing locking of stent and incomplete stent expansion. Am J Neuroradiol. 2007; 28: 1403–1404.
7.
CampbellJEBatesMCElmoreM. Endovascular rescue of a fused monorail balloon and cerebral protection device. J Endovasc Ther. 2007; 14: 600–604. doi: 10.1583/1545-1550(2007)14%5B600:EROAFM%5D2.0.CO;2.
8.
LownieSPPelzDMLeeDH. Efficacy of treatment of severe carotid bifurcation stenosis by using self-expanding stents without deliberate use of angioplasty balloons. Am J Neuroradiol. 2005; 26:1241–1248.
9.
MaynarMBaldiSRostagnoR. Carotid stenting without use of balloon angioplasty and distal protection devices: preliminary experience in 100 cases. Am J Neuroradiol. 2007; 28: 1378–1383.
10.
BaldiSZanderTRabellinoM. Carotid artery stenting without angioplasty and cerebral protection: a single-center experience with up to 7 years' follow-up. Am J Neuroradiol. 2011; 32: 759–763. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2375.
11.
Al-MubarakNColomboAGainesPA. Multi-center evaluation of carotid artery stenting with a filter protection system. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002; 39: 841–846. doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(02)01692-3.
12.
EskandariMKNajjarSFMatsumuraJS. Technical limitations of carotid filter embolic protection devices. Ann Vasc Surg. 2007; 21: 403–407. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2006.07.005.
13.
PeelGWholeyMHHaginoRT. Percutaneous carotid artery intervention: a word of caution about mixing stent/filter systems. J Endovasc Ther. 2007; 14: 110–112. doi: 10.1583/1545-1550(2007)14%5B110:PCAIAW%5D2.0.CO;2.
14.
NguyenNGudavalliACoveC. FilterWire Ex membrane tear from plaque burden. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2005; 64: 160–162. doi: 10.1002/ccd.20258.
15.
CardaioliPGiordanMPanfiliM. Complication with an embolic protection device during carotid angioplasty. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2004; 62: 234–236. doi: 10.1002/ccd.20061.
