In this study, the author evaluates some of the key assertions of the segmented assimilation theory by examining the generational pattern of achievement among Latino high school students. Segmented assimilation theory posits that the outcomes of immigrants will not necessarily improve monotonically across generations, especially in disadvantaged contexts, and that maintaining familial and ethnic ties can have a protective effect on immigrant students. The author tests these ideas by examining variation in the generational pattern of achievement in low-income schools among Latino high school students. The author finds that changes in achievement across generations generally follow a pattern of classical assimilation with small, though not statistically significant, improvements in achievement from the first to the second generation and from the second to the third generation in both poor and nonpoor schools. Contrary to hypotheses derived from segmented assimilation theory, the author finds no evidence of “downward assimilation” across generations among Latinos attending low-income schools.
AlbaRichardNeeVictor. 1997. “Rethinking Assimilation Theory for a New Era of Immigration”. International Migration Review31: 826–74.
2.
AlbaRichardNeeVictor. 2003. Remaking the American Mainstream: Assimilation and Contemporary Immigration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3.
AlexanderKarl L.PallasAaron M., 1985. “School Sector and Cognitive Performance: When Is a Little a Little?”Sociology of Education58: 115–28.
4.
AriasM. Beatriz. 1986. “The Context of Education for Hispanic Students: An Overview”. American Journal of Education95(1): 26–57.
5.
BeanFrank D.TiendaMarta. 1987. The Hispanic Population in the United States. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
6.
ColemanJames S.1988. “Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital”. American Journal of Sociology94: S95–S120.
7.
CorneliusWayne A.1995. “Educating California's Immigrant Children: Introduction and Overview”. Pp. 1–16 in California's Immigrant Children: Theory, Research and Implications for Educational Policy, edited by RumbautR. G.CorneliusW. A., San Diego: University of California, San Diego, Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies.
8.
DeWindJoshKasinitzPhilip. 1997. “Everything Old Is New Again? Processes and Theories of Immigrant Incorporation”. International Migration Review31: 1096–111.
9.
GlickJennifer E.WhiteMichael J., 2003. “The Academic Trajectories of Immigrant Youths: Analysis Within and Across Cohorts”. Demography40: 759–83.
10.
GordonMilton. 1964. Assimilation in American Life: The Role of Race, Religion and National Origins. New York: Oxford University Press.
11.
GroggerJeffreyTrejoStephen J., 2002. “Falling Behind or Moving Up? The Intergenerational Progress of Mexican Americans”. Public Policy Institute of California, San Francisco, CA.
12.
HirschmanCharles. 1996. “Studying Immigrant Adaptation from the 1990 Population Census: From Generational Comparisons to the Process of ‘Becoming American.’” Pp. 54–81 in The New Second Generation, edited by PortesA., New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
13.
KaoGraceTiendaMarta. 1995. “Optimism and Achievement: The Educational Performance of Immigrant Youth”. Social Science Quarterly76: 1–19.
14.
LandaleNancy S.OropesaR. S.LlanesDaniel. 1998. “Schooling, Work, and Idleness among Mexican and Non-Latino White Adolescents”. Social Science Research27: 457–80.
15.
LoGerfoLauraNicholsAustinReardonSean F.. 2006. “Achievement Gains in Elementary and High School”. Urban Institute, Washington, D.C.
16.
Matute-BianchiMaria E.1986. “Ethnic Identities and Patterns of School Success and Failure among Mexican-Descent and Japanese American Students in a California High School”. American Journal of Education95: 233–55.
17.
National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education. 1995. “The Condition of Education 1995: The Educational Progress of Hispanic Students”. NCES, Washington, D.C.
18.
National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education. 2002. “The Condition of Education 2002”. NCES, Washington, D.C.
19.
NeckermanKathryn M.CarterPrudenceLeeJennifer. 1999. “Segmented Assimilation and Minority Cultures of Mobility”. Ethnic and Racial Studies22(6): 945–65.
20.
OgbuJohn U.1978. Minority Education and Caste. New York: Academic Press.
21.
PerlmannJoelWaldingerRoger. 1997. “Second Generation Decline? Children of Immigrants, Past and Present—A Reconsideration”. International Migration Review31: 893–922.
22.
PortesAlejandroRumbautRuben. 1996. Immigrant America: A Portrait. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
23.
PortesAlejandroRumbautRuben. 2001. Legacies: The Story of the Immigrant Second Generation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
24.
PortesAlejandroTrueloveCynthia. 1987. “Making Sense of Diversity: Recent Research on Hispanic Minorities in the United States”. Annual Review of Sociology13: 359–85.
25.
PortesAlejandroZhouMin. 1993. “The New Second Generation: Segmented Assimilation and Its Variants”. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science530: 74–93.
26.
RamirezRoberto R.de la CruzG. Patricia. 2003. “The Hispanic Population in the United States: March 2002”. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, D.C.
27.
RoystonPatrick. 2004. “Multiple Imputation of Missing Values”. Stata Journal4: 227–41.
28.
RubinDonald B.1987. Multiple Imputation for Non-Response in Surveys. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
29.
RumbautRuben G.1995. “The New Californians: Comparative Research Findings on the Educational Progress of Immigrant Children”. Pp. 17–69 in California's Immigrant Children: Theory, Research and Implications for Educational Policy, edited by RumbautR. G.CorneliusW. A., San Diego: University of California, San Diego, Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies.
30.
StowellJacob. 2002. “Hispanic Populations and their Residential Patterns in the Metropolis”. Lewis Mumford Center for Comparative Urban and Regional Research.
31.
TherrienMelissaRamirezRoberto R., 2000. “The Hispanic Population in the United States: Population Characteristics”. Current Population Reports, Census Bureau.
WaldingerRogerFelicianoCynthia. 2004. “Will the New Second Generation Experience ‘Downward Assimilation’? Segmented Assimilation Re-Assessed”. Ethnic and Racial Studies27: 376–402.
34.
WarrenJohn Robert. 1996. “Educational Inequality among White and Mexican-Origin Adolescents in the American Southwest: 1990”. Sociology of Education69: 142–58.
35.
WojtkiewiczRoger A.DonatoKatharine M., 1995. “Hispanic Educational Attainment: The Effects of Family Background and Nativity”. Social Forces74: 559–74.
36.
XieYuGreenmanEmily. 2005. “Segmented Assimilation Theory: A Reformulation and Empirical Test”. Population Studies Center, University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research.
37.
ZhouMin. 1999. “Segmented Assimilation: Issues, Controversies, and Recent Research on the New Second Generation”. Pp. 196–211 in The Handbook of International Migration: The American Experience, edited by HirschmanC.KasinitzP.DeWindJ., New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
38.
ZsembikBarbara A.LlanesDaniel. 1996. “Generational Differences in Educational Achievement among Mexican Americans”. Social Science Quarterly77: 363–75.
