Dependency scholars emphasize the harmful effects of economic incorporation for nations residing in the periphery. Conversely, a network perspective of international relations suggests that the major problem peripheral countries face is isolation. Considered together, peripherality implies both resource and partner dependency. Applying dependency and network principles to the world economy and world polity, the author assembles a set of cross-national measures based on international trade relations and membership in international nongovernmental organizations (INGOs). Analyzing a sample of eighty-two developing countries during the 1980–2000 period, the author tests the effects of dependency and network integration on two measures of development: Economic growth and tertiary school expansion. The author finds that dependent integration in trade and INGOs produces economic underdevelopment, while network integration in trade and INGOs positively affects economic growth and educational expansion. The findings broadly confirm dependency and network perspectives, demonstrating the developmental benefits that accrue to core/central actors relative to more dependent/peripheral economies.
BoliJohnThomasGeorge. 1997. “World Culture in the World Polity: A Century of International Nongovernmental Organization.”American Sociological Review62:171–90.
2.
BollenKenneth. 1983. “World System Position, Dependency, and Democracy: The Cross-National Evidence.”American Sociological Review48:468–79.
3.
BollenKennethJackmanRobert. 1985. “Political Democracy and the Size Distribution of Income.”American Sociological Review50:438–57.
4.
BorgattiStephenEverettMartin. 1999. “Models of Core/Periphery Structures.”Social Networks21:375–95.
5.
BorgattiStephenEverettMartinFreemanLinton. 2002. Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Cambridge, MA: Analytic Technologies, Harvard.
6.
BradshawYork. 1987. “Urbanization and Underdevelopment: A Global Study of Modernization, Urban Bias, and Economic Dependency.”American Sociological Review52:224–39.
7.
BradshawYorkSchaferMark. 2000. “Urbanization and Development: The Emergence of International Nongovernmental Organizations amid Declining States.”Sociological Perspectives43:97–116.
8.
Chase-DunnChristopher. 1998. Global Formation: Structures of the World-Economy, updated. edition. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
9.
ChatterjeeSampritHadiAliPriceBertram. 2000. Regression Analysis by Example, third edition. New York: Wiley.
10.
DelacroixJacquesRaginCharles. 1981. “Structural Blockage: A Cross-National Study of Economic Dependency, State Efficacy, and Underdevelopment.”American Journal of Sociology86:1311–47.
11.
DixonWilliamBoswellTerry. 1996. “Dependency, Disarticulation, and Denominator Effects: Another Look at Foreign Capital Penetration.”American Journal of Sociology102:543–62.
12.
FernandoJude. 2003. “NGOs and Production of Indigenous Knowledge under the Condition of Postmodernity.”Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science590:54–72.
13.
FrankAndre. 1967. Capitalism and Underdevelopment in Latin America: Historical Studies of Chile and Brazil. New York: Monthly Review Press.
14.
FrankDavidHironakaAnnSchoferEvan. 2000. “The Nation-State and the Natural Environment over the Twentieth Century.”American Sociological Review65:96–116.
15.
Hafner-BurtonEmilieTsutsuiKiyoteru. 2005. “Human Rights in a Globalizing World: The Paradox of Empty Promises.”American Journal of Sociology110:1373–411.
16.
HardtMichaelNegriAntonio. 2000. Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development. 2004. World Development Indicators CD-ROM: 2004. Washington, DC: Author.
17.
International Monetary Fund. 2004. Direction of Trade Statistics: March 2004 (CD-ROM). Washington, DC: Author.
18.
JackmanRobert. 1980. “A Note on the Measurement of Growth Rates in Cross-National Research.”American Journal of Sociology86:604–17.
19.
KentorJeffrey. 1998. “The Long-Term Effects of Foreign Investment Dependence on Economic Growth, 1940–1990.”American Journal of Sociology103:1024–46.
20.
KentorJeffreyBoswellTerry. 2003. “Foreign Capital Dependence and Development: A New Direction.”American Sociological Review68:301–13.
21.
KickEdward. 1987. “World-System Structure, National Development, and the Prospects for a Socialist World Order.” Pp. 127–55 in America's Changing Role in the World-System, edited by BoswellT.BergesenA., New York: Praeger.
22.
KentorJeffreyDavisByron. 2001. “World-System Structure and Change: An Analysis of Global Networks and Economic Growth across Two Time Periods.”American Behavioral Scientist44:1561–78.
23.
KimSangmoonShinEui-Hang. 2002. “A Longitudinal Analysis of Globalization and Regionalization in International Trade: A Social Network Approach.”Social Forces81:445–71.
24.
MahutgaMatthew. 2006. “The Persistence of Structural Inequality? A Network Analysis of International Trade, 1965–2000.”Social Forces84:1863–89.
25.
MarshallMontyJaggersKeith. 2005. Polity IV Project: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2003. Retrieved May 1, 2005, from http://www.cidcm.umd.edu/inscr/polity/index.htm.
26.
MeyerJohnBoliJohnThomasGeorgeRamirezFrancisco. 1997. “World Society and the Nation-State.”American Journal of Sociology103:144–81.
27.
NemethRogerSmithDavid. 1985. “International Trade and World-System Structure: A Multiple Network Analysis.”Review8:517–60.
28.
NolanPatrick. 1983. “Status in the World System, Income Inequality, and Economic Growth.”American Journal of Sociology89:410–19.
29.
PowellMikeSeddonDavid. 1997. “NGOs and the Development Industry.”Review of African Political Economy71:3–10.
30.
AdrianRaftery. 1995. “Bayesian Model Selection in Social Research.”Sociological Methodology25:111–63.
31.
SchaferMark. 1999. “International Nongovernmental Organizations and Third World Education in 1990: A Cross-National Study.”Sociology of Education72:69–88.
32.
SchoferEvanHironakaAnn. 2005. “The Effects of World Society on Environmental Protection Outcomes.”Social Forces84:25–47.
33.
SchoferEvanMeyerJohn. 2005. “The Worldwide Expansion of Higher Education in the Twentieth Century.”American Sociological Review70:898–920.
34.
ShenCeWilliamsonJohn. 1997. “Child Mortality, Women's Status, Economic Dependency, and State Strength: A Cross-National Study of Less Developed Countries.”Social Forces76:667–700.
35.
SmithDavidWhiteDouglas. 1992. “Structure and Dynamics of the Global Economy: Network Analysis of International Trade 1965–1980.”Social Forces70:857–93.
36.
SnyderDavidKickEdward. 1979. “Structural Position in the World System and Economic Growth, 1955–1970: A Multiple-Network Analysis of Transnational Interactions.”American Journal of Sociology84:1096–126.
37.
CorporationStata. 2007. Stata 10.0. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
38.
StokesRandallAndersonAndy. 1990. “Disarticulation and Human Welfare in Less Developed Countries.”American Sociological Review55:63–74.
39.
Union of International Associations. 1985. Yearbook of International Organizations 1985/1986. Munchen, Germany: K. G. Saur.
40.
Van RossemRonan. 1996. “The World System Paradigm as General Theory of Development: A Cross-National Test.”American Sociological Review61:508–27.
41.
WallersteinImmanuel. 1974. The Modern World-System: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century. New York: Academic Press.
42.
WickramaK. A. S.MulfordCharles. 1996. “Political Democracy, Economic Development, Disarticulation, and Social Well-Being in Developing Countries.”Sociological Quarterly37:375–90.
