Abstract
This study assesses the institutional impact of coercive, normative, and mimetic pressures on job-training programs and the extent to which the institutionalization of such programs is contingent upon the environment in which organizations operate. Event-history analysis of a retrospective data set (1967 to 1997) of 301 American organizations indicates that having an external human resources attorney and competing with a number of other organizations with training—two of the mimetic institutional effects—are the driving factors behind the spread of job-training programs. Furthermore, these mimetic institutional pressures exert a stronger impact on governmental organizations' choice to adopt training programs than on for-profit firms. Governmental agencies appear to be more responsive to institutional influences because, compared with for-profit firms, they are in greater need of external legitimation of their procedures and operations, one of the crucial benefits of being an institutional conformist.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
