The purpose of this study was to collect, analyze, and report the voices of immigrant Mexicanas as they talked about their new lives in Iowa. Changing material conditions wrested from them their traditional lifestyle and threw them into a situation in which they adapted by maintaining traditional gender ideology while transgressing traditional gender behavior. This gender paradox connects their ideology and behavior in a kind of functionality whereby the women violate traditional gender boundaries as a way to maintain and support traditional gender ideology. The paradoxical relationship between behavior and ideology does not just co-occur; rather, breaking away from traditional gender behavior helps to protect the traditional gender ideology that is central to their lives. The gender paradox reveals that Mexicanas are active agents carving a space for themselves under rapidly changing material conditions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdlerPatriciaAdlerPeter. 2003. “The Promise and Pitfalls of Going into the Field.”Contexts: Understanding People in Their Social Worlds2: 41–47.
2.
ZinnMaxine Baca. 1980. “Employment and Education of Mexican-American Women: The Interplay of Modernity and Ethnicity in Eight Families.”Harvard Educational Review50: 47–62.
3.
ZinnMaxine BacaEitzenD. Stanley. 2002. Diversity in Families. 6th ed.Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
4.
BakerPhyllis. 1991. Bored and Busy at Work: An Analysis of Formal and Informal Organization in the Automated Office. New York: Peter Lang.
5.
BakerPhyllis. 1999. “‘I Take Care of My Kids’: Mothering Practices of Substance-abusing Women.”Gender & Society13: 347–63.
6.
BergBruce. 2001. Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences. 4th ed.Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
7.
CastilloAdelaida. 1996. “Gender and Its Discontinuities in Male/Female Domestic Relations: Mexicans in Cross-Cultural Context.” Pp. 207–30 in Chicanas/Chicanos at the Crossroads: Social, Economic, and Political Change, edited by MacielD.OrtizI., Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
8.
ChangChang. 2000. Disposable Domestics: Immigrant Women Workers in the Global Economy. Cambridge, MA: South End Press.
9.
ChavezLeo. 1998. Shadowed Lives: Undocumented Immigrants in American Society. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt, Brace College.
10.
Chavira-PradoAlicia. 1992. “Work, Health, and the Family: Gender Structure and Women's Status in an Undocumented Migrant Population.”Human Organization51: 53–64.
11.
Cobb-ClarkDeborahKossoudjiSherrie. 2000. “Mobility in El Norte: The Employment and Occupational Changes of Unauthorized Latin American Women.”Social Science Quarterly81: 311–24.
12.
ColtraneScottCollinsRandall. 2001. Sociology of Marriage and the Family: Gender, Love, and Property. 5th ed.Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
13.
CorneliusWayne. 1992. “From Sojourners to Settlers: The Changing Profile of Mexican Immigration to the United States.” Pp. 155–95 in U.S.-Mexico Relations: Labor Market Interdependence, edited by BustamanteJ.ReynoldsC.OjedaR. Hinojosa. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
14.
EnchauteguiMariaMaloneNolan. 1997. “Female Immigrants: A Socio-Economic Portrait.”Migration World Magazine25: 18–24.
15.
FalicouCelia. 2002. “Ambiguous Loss: Risk and Resilience in Latino Immigrant Families.” Pp. 274–88 in Latinos Remaking America, edited by Suarez-OrozcoM.PaezM., Berkeley: University of California Press.
16.
Fernandez-KellyPatriciaGarciaAnna. 1989. “Informalization at the Core: Hispanic Women, Homework, and the Advanced Capitalist State.” Pp. 247–64 in The Informal Economy: Studies in Advanced and Less Developed Countries, edited by PortesA.CastellsM.BentonL., Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
GreyMark. 1999. “Structural Change in Agribusiness and Recent Influxes of Immigrants and Refugees to Iowa.” Paper presented to the Iowa State Advisory Committee, United States Commission on Civil Rights, Des Moines, Iowa. April.
19.
GreyMark. 2000. “Marshalltown Iowa and the Struggle for Community in a Global Age.” Pp. 87–100 in Communities and Capital: Local Struggles against Corporate Power and Privatization, edited by CollinsT.WingardJ., Athens: University of Georgia Press.
20.
GreyMarkWoodrickAnne. 2002. “Unofficial Sister Cities: Meatpacking and Labor Migration between Villachuato, Mexico, and Marshalltown, Iowa. Human Organization61: 364–76.
21.
GriswoldDaniel. 2002. “Willing Workers: Fixing the Problem of Illegal Mexican Migration to the United States.”CATO Institute, #19. Retrieved October 29, 2002 http://www.freetrade.org/pubs/pas/tpa-019.pdf.
22.
HackenbergRobertAlvarezRobert. 2001. “Close-ups of Postnationalism: Reports from the U.S.-Mexico Borderlands.”Human Organization60: 97–104.
23.
HeymanJosiah. 2001. “Class and Classification at the U.S.-Mexico Border.”Human Organization60: 128–40.
24.
HirschJennifer. 2000. “En El Norte La Mujer Manda: Gender, Generation, and Geography in a Mexican Transnational Community.” Pp 369–88 in Immigration Research for a New Century, edited by FonerN.RumbautR.GoldS., New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
25.
Hondagneu-SoteloPierrette. 2002. “Families on the Frontier: From Braceros in the Fields to Braceras in the Home.” Pp. 259–73 in Latinos Remaking America, edited by Suarez-OrozcoM.PaezM., Berkeley: University of California Press.
26.
Hondagneu-SoteloPierretteAvilaErnestine. 1997. “I'm Here, But I'm There: The Meanings of Latina Transitional Motherhood.”Gender & Society11: 548–70.
LindborgKristinaOvandoCarlos. 1977. Five Mexican-American Women in Transition: A Case Study of Migrants in the Midwest. San Francisco: R & E Research Associates.
29.
LoflandJohnLoflandLyn. 1995. Analyzing Social Settings: A Guide to Qualitative Observation and Analysis. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
30.
MontoyaRosario. 2002. “Women's Sexuality in Rural Nicaragua.” Pp. 65–88 in Gender's Place: Feminist Anthropologies of Latin America, edited by MontoyaR.FrazierL.HurtigJ., New York: Macmillan.
31.
NewmanDavid. 1999. Sociology of Families. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
32.
OrreniusPia. 2001. “Illegal Immigration and Enforcement along the U.S.-Mexico Border: An Overview.”Economic and Financial Review1: 2–11.
