The television situation comedy Will and Grace is notable as the first successful network prime-time series to feature gay characters in a gay milieu. The show's considerable popularity begs the question of how the show's gay sensibility and humor, particularly the gay trickster character, Jack, is received by a heterosexual audience. This article discusses the notion of gay humor, considers the show's history, analyzes several episodes, and scrutinizes the responses of 136 college students who watched the show. Viewers do not identify with Jack and regard him as the most frequent butt of humor on the show, but they also consider him the funniest character and, by a very slight margin, their favorite. Contrary to my original hypotheses, respondent characterizations of Jack tend to reflect appreciation for all aspects of his trickster personality, though his ostentatious sexuality tends to be ignored.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ApteMahadev L.1985. Humor and Laughter: An Anthropological Approach. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
2.
BabuscioJack. 1984. “Camp and the Gay Sensibility.” Pp. 40–57 in Gays and Film, edited by DyerR., New York: Zoetrope.
3.
BattlesKathleenHilton-MorrowWendy. 2002. “Gay Characters in Conventional Spaces: Will and Grace and the Situation Comedy Genre.”Critical Studies in Media Communication19 (1): 87–105.
4.
BergmanDavid. 1993. “Introduction.” Pp. 3–16 in Camp Grounds: Style and Homosexuality, edited by BergmanD., Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
5.
BrittonAndrew. 1999. “For Interpretation: Notes against Camp.” Pp. 136–42 in Camp: Queer Aesthetics and the Performing Subject: A Reader, edited by CletoF., Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
6.
ButlerJudith. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.
CletoFabio, ed. 1999. Camp: Queer Aesthetics and the Performing Subject: A Reader. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
9.
DaviesChristie. 1990. Ethnic Humor around the World: A Comparative Analysis. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
10.
DavisMurray. 1995. “The Sociology of Humor: A Stillborn Field?”Sociological Forum10 (2): 327–39.
11.
DyerRichard. 1986. Heavenly Bodies: Film Stars and Society. New York: St. Martin's Press.
12.
DyerRichard. 1999. “It's Being So Camp as Keeps Us Going.” Pp. 110–16 in Camp: Queer Aesthetics and the Performing Subject: A Reader, edited by CletoF., Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
13.
EhrensteinDavid. 1999. “More than Friends.” Pp. 335–40 in The Columbia Reader on Lesbians and Gay Men in Media, Society and Politics, edited by GrossL.WoodsJ., New York: Columbia University Press.
14.
GoldmanAlbert. 1987. “Laughtermakers.” Pp. 80–88 in Jewish Wry, edited by CohenS. B., Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
15.
HarrisDaniel. 1997. The Rise and Fall of Gay Culture. New York: Hyperion.
16.
HughesLangston. 1951. “Jokes Negroes Tell on Themselves.”Negro Digest9:21–25.
17.
JacobsA. J.1998. “When Gay Men Happen to Straight Women.”Entertainment Weekly, October 23. Retrieved August 9, 2001, from http://www.ew.com.
18.
KirbyDavid. 2001. “The Boys in the Writers' Room.”New York Times, June 17, pp. 23, 33.
19.
KisselRick. 2001. “Femmes Flock to Peacock.”Variety383(4):12.
20.
KlappOrrin. 1962. “The Fool as a Social Type.”American Journal of Sociology55:167–72.
21.
KleinhansChuck. 1994. “Taking Out the Trash: Camp and the Politics of Parody.” Pp. 182–201 in The Politics and Poetics of Camp, edited by MeyerM., New York: Routledge.
22.
MeyerMoe. 1994. “Introduction: Reclaiming the discourse of Camp.” Pp. 1–22 in The Politics and Poetics of Camp, edited by MeyerM., New York: Routledge.
