This study examines the effect of attending an all-girls' high school on the sex-traditionality of women's choice of college major. Using data from the High School and Beyond study and multinomial logit analysis, the results indicate that women who attended all-girls' high schools (versus coed high schools) were more likely to major in sex-integrated fields, compared to highly female fields. The effect may be due in small part to feminist attitudes produced in an all-female high school environment but is not due to differences in coursework (particularly math) or test scores.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AgrestiAlan. 1991. Categorical Data Analysis. New York: John Wiley.
2.
AllisonPaul. 1999. Logistic Regression Using the SAS System. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
3.
American Association of University Women (AAUW). 1992. How Schools Shortchange Girls. Washington, DC: AAUW Educational Foundation.
4.
American Association of University Women (AAUW). 1998. Separated by Sex: A Critical Look at Single-Sex Education for Girls. Washington, DC: AAUW Educational Foundation.
5.
BowlesSamuelGintisHerbert. 1976. Schooling in Capitalist America: Educational Reform and the Contradictions of Economic LifeNew York: Basic Books.
6.
BrykAnthony S.LeeValerie E.HollandPeter. 1993. Catholic Schools and the Common GoodCambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7.
CarpenterPeterHaydenMartin. 1987. “Girls' Academic Achievement: Single-Sex versus Coeducational Schools in Australia.”Sociology of Education60:156–67.
8.
ChafetzJanet Saltzman. 1990. Gender Equity: An Integrated Theory of Stability and Change. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
9.
ColemanJames S.1961. The Adolescent Society. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.
10.
DaleReginald R.1969. Mixed or Single-Sex Schools? Vol. 1: A Research Study about Pupil-Teacher Relationships. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
11.
DaleReginald R.1971. Mixed or Single-Sex Schools? Vol. 2: Some Social Aspects. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
12.
DaleReginald R.1974. Mixed or Single-Sex Schools? Vol. 3: Attainment, Attitudes, and Overview. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
13.
DaymontThomas N.AndrisaniPaul J., 1984. “Job Preferences, College Major, and the Gender Gap in Earnings.”Journal of Human Resources19(3):82–99.
14.
EcclesJacquelynne. 1984. “Sex Differences in Mathematics Participation.” Pp. 92–137 in Advances in Motivation and Achievement, vol. 2, edited by SteinkampM. W.MaehrM. L., Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
15.
EnglandPaula. 1992. Comparable Worth: Theories and Evidence. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
16.
EthingtonCorinna A.WolfleLee M., 1988. “Women's Selection of Quantitative Undergraduate Fields of Study: Direct and Indirect Influences.”American Educational Research Journal25(2):157–75.
17.
FeatherN. T., 1974. “Coeducation, Values, and Satisfaction with School.”Journal of Educational Psychology66(1):9–15.
18.
FrehillLisa M.1997. “Education and Occupational Sex Segregation: The Decision to Major in Engineering.”Sociological Quarterly38(2):225–49.
19.
GerhartBarry. 1990. “Gender Differences in Current and Starting Salaries: The Role of Performance, College Major, and Job Title.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review43(4): 418–33.
20.
HallRoberta M.1986. The Campus Climate Revisited: Chilly for Women Faculty, Administrators, and Graduate Students. Washington, DC: Project on the Status and Education of Women, Association of American Colleges.
21.
HallRoberta M.SandlerBernice R., 1982. The Classroom Climate: A Chilly One for Women?Washington, DC: Project on the Status and Education of Women, Association of American Colleges.
22.
HallRoberta M.SandlerBernice R., 1984. Out of the Classroom: A Chilly Campus for Women?Washington, DC: Project on the Status and Education of Women, Association of American Colleges.
23.
HardinJoyDedeChristopher J., 1973. “Discrimination against Women in Science Education.”Science Teacher40:18–21.
24.
HarkerRichard. 2000. “Achievement, Gender and the Single-Sex/Coed Debate.”British Journal of Sociology of Education21(2):203–18.
25.
HollandDorothy C.EisenhartMargaret A., 1990. Educated in Romance: Women, Achievement, and College Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
26.
JacobsJerry A.1989. Revolving Doors: Sex Segregation and Women's Careers. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
27.
JacobsJerry A.1995. “Gender and Academic Specialties: Trends among Recipients of College Degrees in the 1980's.”Sociology of Education68:81–98.
28.
JimenezEmmanuelLockheedMarlaine E., 1989. “Enhancing Girls' Learning through Single-Sex Education: Evidence and a Policy Conundrum.”Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis11:117–42.
29.
JonesJ. CharlesShallcrossJackDennisC. L., 1972. “Coeducation and Adolescent Values.”Journal of Educational Psychology63(4):334–41.
30.
KahleJane ButlerLakesMarsha K., 1983. “The Myth of Equality in Science Classrooms.”Journal of Research in Science Teaching20:131–40.
31.
LederGilah C.FennemaElizabeth. 1990. “Gender Differences in Mathematics: A Synthesis.” Pp. 188–99 in Mathematics and Gender, edited by FennemaE.LederG. J., New York: Teachers College Press.
32.
LeeValerie E.BrykAnthony S., 1986. “Effects of Single-Sex Secondary Schools on Student Achievement and Attitudes.”Journal of Educational Psychology78(5):381–95.
33.
LeeValerie E.LockheedMarlaine E., 1990. “The Effect of Single-Sex Schooling and Attitudes in Nigeria.”Comparative Education Review34:209–31.
34.
LeeValerie E.MarksHelen M., 1990. “Sustained Effects of the Single-Sex Secondary School Experience on Attitudes, Behaviors, and Values in College.”Journal of Educational Psychology82(3):578–92.
35.
LeeValerie E.MarksHelen M.ByrdTina. 1994. “Sexism in Single-Sex and Coeducational Independent Secondary School Classrooms.”Sociology of Education67:92–120.
36.
LePorePaul C.WarrenJohn Robert. 1997. “A Comparison of Single-Sex and Coeducational Catholic Secondary Schooling: Evidence from the National Educational Longitudinal Study of 1988.”American Educational Research Journal34(3):485–511.
37.
MacLeodJay. 1987. Ain't No Makin' It: Aspirations and Attainment in a Low-Income Neighborhood. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
38.
MaelFred A.1998. “Single-Sex and Coeducational Schooling: Relationships to Socioemotional and Academic Development.”Review of Educational Research68(2):101–29.
39.
MapleSue A.StageFrances K., 1991. “Influences on the Choice of Math/Science Major by Gender and Ethnicity.”American Educational Research Journal28(1):37–60.
40.
MarshHerbert W.1989. “Effects of Attending Single-Sex and Coeducational High Schools: Achievement, Attitudes, Behavior, and Sex Differences.”Journal of Educational Psychology81(1):70–85.
41.
MarshHerbert W.1991. “Public, Catholic Single-Sex, and Catholic Coeducational High Schools: Their Effects on Achievement, Affect, and Behaviors.”American Journal of Education99(3):320–56.
42.
MarshHerbert W.SmithIan D.MarshMargaretOwensLee. 1988. “The Transition from Single-Sex to Coeducational High Schools: Effects on Multiple Dimensions of Self-Concept and on Academic Achievement.”American Educational Research Journal25(2):237–69.
43.
Miller-BernalLeslie. 1989. “College Experiences and Sex-Role Attitudes: Does a Woman's College Make a Difference?”Youth and Society20(4):363–87.
44.
Miller-BernalLeslie. 1993. “Single-Sex versus Coeducational Environments: A Comparison of Women Students' Experiences at Four Colleges.”American Journal of Education102(1):23–54.
45.
National Center for Educational Statistics. 1986. Digest of Educational Statistics. Washington, DC. Pp. 194–201.
46.
OakesJeannie. 1990. “Opportunities, Achievement, and Choice: Women and Minority Students in Science and Mathematics.” Pp. 153–222 in Review of Research in Education, vol. 16, edited by CazdenB., Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
47.
OrensteinPeggy. 1994. School Girls: Young Women, Self-Esteem, and the Confidence GapNew York: Doubleday.
48.
RiordanCornelius. 1985. “Public and Catholic Schooling: The Effects of Gender Context Policy.”American Journal of Education93(4):518–40.
49.
RiordanCornelius. 1994. “The Value of Attending a Women's College: Education, Occupation, and Income Benefits.”Journal of Higher Education65(4):486–510.
50.
RubenfeldMona I.GilroyFaith D.1991. “Relationship between College Women's Occupational Interests and a Single-Sex Environment.”Career Development Quarterly40(1):64–70.
51.
SadkerMyraSadkerDavid. 1994. Failing at Fairness. New York: Macmillan.
52.
SchneiderFrank W.CouttsLarry M., 1982. “The High School Environment: A Comparison of Coeducational and Single-Sex Schools.”Journal of Educational Psychology74(6):898–906.
53.
ShmurakCarole B.1998. Voices of Hope: Adolescent Girls at Single Sex and Coeducational School. New York: Peter Lang.
54.
TidballM. Elizabeth. 1973. “Perspectives on Academic Women and Affirmative Action.”Educational Record54:130–35.
55.
TidballM. Elizabeth. 1974. “The Search for Talented Women.”Change6:51–52.
56.
TidballM. Elizabeth. 1980. “Women's Colleges and Women Achievers Revisited.”Signs5:504–17.
57.
TidballM. Elizabeth. 1985. “Baccalaureate Origins of Entrants into American Medical Schools.”Journal of Higher Education56:385–402.
58.
TidballM. Elizabeth. 1986. “Baccalaureate Origins of Recent Natural Science Doctorates.”Journal of Higher Education57:606–20.
59.
TidballM. ElizabethKistrakowskyV.1976. “Baccalaureate Origins of American Scientists and Scholars.”Science193:646–52.
60.
TrickettEdison J.TrickettPenelope K.CastroJulie J.SchaffnerPaul. 1982. “The Independent School Experience: Aspects of the Normative Environments of Single-Sex and Coed Secondary Schools.”Journal of Educational Psychology74(3):374–81.
61.
WillisPaul. 1977. Learning to Labor: How Working Class Kids Get Working Class JobsNew York: Columbia University Press.
