Marriage and fatherhood policies, inspired by the Christian Right and backed by conservative think tanks, have gained widespread support based on moral framing of family issues and simplistic interpretation of sociological “evidence.” Hybrid political-religious organizations including the National Fatherhood Initiative, the Marriage Movement, and Promise Keepers make rhetorical claims with similar religious underpinnings, policy objectives, assertions of social scientific consensus, and conservative foundation funding. Contrary to predictions about the diminishing influence of the Christian Right on social policy, religious and free-market conservatives have successfully joined forces to promote public policies favoring married heterosexual parents over other household types by relying on specious comparisons between “traditional” and “nontraditional” families. Sociologists of all faiths have a moral obligation to ensure that their research findings are not misinterpreted in the service of a narrow religious agenda or inappropriately used to justify nostalgic exclusionary family policies.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllenL. Dean. 2000. “Promise Keepers and Racism: Frame Resonance as an Indicator of Organizational Vitality.”Sociology of Religion61: 55–72.
American Values: 1998 National Survey of Americans on Values. 1998. Washington Post/Kaiser Family Foundation/Harvard University Survey Project. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation.
4.
AndersonConnieMessnerMichael A., 1998. “The Political Is Personal: Masculinity Therapy and Patriarchal Bargains among the Promise Keepers.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Pacific Sociological Association, San Francisco, CA.
5.
BartkowskiJohn P.2000. “Breaking Walls, Raising Fences: Masculinity, Intimacy, and Accountability among the Promise Keepers.”Sociology of Religion61: 33–54.
6.
BerletChip, ed. 1995. Eyes Right! Challenging the Right Wing Backlash. Boston: South End Press.
7.
BerletChipLyonsMatthew. 2000. Right-Wing Populism in America: Too Close for Comfort. New York: Guilford Press.
8.
AndrewBillingsley. 1999. Mighty Like a River: The Black Church and Social Reform. New York: Oxford University Press.
9.
BlankenhornDavid. 1995. Fatherless America: Confronting Our Most Urgent Social Problem. New York: Basic Books.
10.
BlankenhornDavid. 1999. “Toward Fatherhood.” Pp. xi–xv in The Fatherhood Movement: A Call to Action, edited by HornW. F.BlankenhornD.PearlsteinM. B., Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
11.
BlochJon P.2000. “The New and Improved Clint Eastwood: Change and Persistence in Promise Keepers Self-Help Literature.”Sociology of Religion61: 11–32.
12.
BooneW.1994. “Why Men Must Pray.” Pp. 25–32 in Seven Promises of a Promise Keeper, edited by JanssenA., Colorado Springs, CO: Focus on the Family Publishing.
13.
BrechbillBonnie Hellum. 2000. “Why Don Eberly Believes Shaping the Culture Is More Important than Making the Laws.”Christian Living47(7): 4–8.
14.
BricknerBryan W.1999. The Promise Keepers: Politics and Promises. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
15.
Coalition for Marriage, Family and Couples Education, LLC (CMFCE), Institute for American Values, and Religion, Culture, and Family Project, University of Chicago, Divinity School. June 30, 2000. “The Marriage Movement: A Statement of Principles.” Retrieved March 23, 2001. http://www.marriagemovement.org/html/report.html.
16.
ColemanJames. 1988. “Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital.”American Journal of Sociology94: S95–120.
17.
ColtraneScott. 1996. Family Man: Fatherhood, Housework, and Gender Equity. New York: Oxford University Press.
18.
ColtraneScott. 1998. Gender and Families. Newbury Park, CA: Pine Forge Press.
19.
ColtraneScott. 2000. “Fatherhood and Marriage in the 21st Century.”National Forum80(Summer): 25–28.
20.
ColtraneScottAdamsMichele. 2001. “Men's Family Work: Child-centered Fathering and the Sharing of Domestic Labor.” Pp. 72–99 in Working Families: The Transformation of the American Home, edited by HertzR.MarshallN., Berkeley: University of California Press.
21.
ColtraneScottCollinsRandall. 2001. Sociology of Marriage and the Family: Gender, Love, and Property. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
22.
ColtraneScottHickmanNeal. 1992. “The Rhetoric of Rights and Needs: Moral Discourse in the Reform of Child Custody and Child Support Laws.”Social Problems39(4): 400–20.
23.
CoolsenPeter. 1993. “Half Full or Half Empty.”Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Human Services74(1): 3.
24.
CoontzStephanie. 1992. The Way We Never Were. New York: Basic Books.
DayRandal D.MackeyWade C.1986. “The Role Image of the American Father: An Examination of a Media Myth.”Journal of Comparative Family Studies17: 371–88.
27.
DayRandal D.MackeyWade C.1989. “An Alternate Standard for Evaluating American Fathers.”Journal of Family Issues10: 401–8.
28.
DiamondSara. 1995. Roads to Dominion: Right-Wing Movements and Political Power in the United States. New York: Guilford Press.
29.
DobsonJames. N.d. “Discipline from Four to Twelve.”Focus on the Family Booklet.
30.
DohertyWilliam J.1991. “Beyond Reactivity and the Deficit Model of Manhood: A Commentary on Articles by Napier, Pittman, and Gottman.”Journal of Marital and Family Therapy17: 29–32.
31.
DohertyWilliam J.1997. “The Best of Times and the Worst of Times: Fathering as a Contested Arena of Academic Discourse.” Pp. 217–27 in Generative Fathering: Beyond Deficit Perspectives, edited by HawkinsA. J.DollahiteD. C., Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32.
DohertyWilliam J.2000. “Consumer Marriage and Modern Covenant Marriage.” Paper presented at the Revitalizing the Institution of Marriage for the 21st Century Conference: Social Science and Legal Scholars Setting a Research and Policy Agenda for Strengthening Marriage. Cosponsored by Brigham Young University School of Family Life, J. Reuben Clark School of Law, and Columbus School of Law, Catholic University, Provo, Utah, March 9–11.
33.
DohertyWilliam J.KouneskiEdward F.EricksonMartha Farrell. 1998. “Responsible Fathering: An Overview and Conceptual Framework.”Journal of Marriage and the Family60: 277–92.
34.
DonovanBrian. 1998. “Political Consequences of Private Authority: Promise Keepers and the Transformation of Hegemonic Masculinity.”Theory and Society27: 817–43.
35.
EberlyDon. 1999. “No Democracy without Dads.” Pp. 25–33 in The Fatherhood Movement: A Call to Action, edited by HornW. F.BlankenhornD.PearlsteinM. B., Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
36.
EberlyDonBlankenhornDavidHornWade1999. “A Call to Fatherhood.” Pp. 169–75 in The Fatherhood Movement: A Call to Action, edited by HornW. F.BlankenhornD.PearlsteinM. B., Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
37.
FaganPatrick F.2000. “Family and Faith: The Roots of Prosperity, Stability and Freedom.”A Heritage FoundationSupplement (Spring). Retrieved July 15, 2001. http://www.heritage.org/shorts/2000familyfaith.html.
FarrarSteve. 1998. Anchor Man: How a Father Can Anchor His Family in Christ for the Next 100 Years. Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson.
40.
FerreeMyra MarxMerrillDavid A., 2000. “Hot Movements, Cold Cognition: Thinking about Social Movements in Gendered Frames.”Contemporary Sociology29(3): 454–62.
41.
GallagherMaggie. 2000. “Women, Power and the Ties That Bind.”American Values Reporter. Retrieved September 18, 2000. http://www.americanvalues.org.
42.
GamsonWilliam. 1985. “Goffman's Legacy to Political Sociology.”Theory and Society14: 551–604.
43.
GlennNorval. 1997. Closed Hearts, Closed Minds: The Textbook Story of Marriage. New York: Institute for American Values.
44.
GlennNorval D.PopenoeDavidBlankenhornDavid (Council on Families in America). 1995. “Marriage in America: A Report to the Nation.”New York: Institute for American Values.
45.
GriffithMarieHarveyPaul. 1998. “Wifely Submission: The SBC Resolution: Southern Baptist Convention and Marriage.”Christian Century115 (July 1): 636.
46.
GusfieldJoseph R.1989. “Constructing the Ownership of Social Problems.”Social Problems36: 431–41.
47.
HawkinsAlan J.DollahiteDavid C., 1997. “Beyond the Role-Inadequacy Perspective of Fathering.” Pp. 3–16 in Generative Fathering: Beyond Deficit Perspectives, edited by HawkinsA. J.DollahiteD. C., Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
48.
HawkinsAlan J.PalkovitzRob. 1999. “Beyond Ticks and Clicks: The Need for More Diverse and Broader Conceptualizations and Measures of Father Involvement.”Journal of Men's Studies8: 11–30.
49.
Heritage Foundation. 2001. “The Federal and State Governments, Welfare and Marriage Issues: Testimony by Patrick F. Fagan.”Testimony before the Committee on Ways and Means Subcommittee on Human Resources, U.S. House of Representatives, Washington, DC. Retrieved July 8, 2001. http://www.heritage.org/library/testimony/test052201.html.
50.
HerrnsteinRichard J.MurrayCharles. 1994. The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life. New York: Free Press.
51.
HimmelsteinJerome L.1990. To the Right: The Transformation of American Conservatism. Berkeley: University of California Press.
52.
HimmelsteinJerome L.1997. Looking Good and Doing Good: Corporate Philanthropy and Corporate Power. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
53.
HornWade. 1999a. “Did You Say ‘Movement’?” Pp. 1–16 in The Fatherhood Movement: A Call to Action, edited by HornW. F.BlankenhornD.PearlsteinM. B., Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
HornWade. 1999c. “Mothers and Fathers Are Different.”Washington Times, July 13. Reproduced in the National Fatherhood Initiative “Fatherly Advice: Dr. Horn's Column.” Retrieved July 15, 2001. http://www.fatherhood.org/articles/wh071399.htm.
56.
HornWade. 2000. “A Misconception about Divorce.”Washington Times, August 29. Reproduced in the National Fatherhood Initiative “Fatherly Advice: Dr. Horn's Column.” Retrieved July 15, 2001. http://www.fatherhood.org/articles/wh082900.htm.
57.
HornWade. 2001. “Marriage Essential to Fatherhood Topic.”Washington Times, January 2. Reproduced in the National Fatherhood Initiative “Fatherly Advice: Dr. Horn's Column.” Retrieved July 15, 2001. http://www.fatherhood.org/articles/wh010201.htm.
58.
HornWadeBushAndrew. 1997. “Fathers, Marriage, and Welfare Reform.” Originally published as a Hudson Institute Report. Welfare Policy Center of the Hudson Institute. Retrieved July 15, 2001. http://www.hudson.org/.
59.
HornWadeSawhillIsabel V., 2001. “Making Room for Daddy: Fathers, Marriage and Welfare Reform.” New World of Welfare Conference Final Papers, University of Michigan Ford School of Public Policy. Retrieved July 20, 2001. http://www.fordschool.umich.edu/Conferences/Horn-Sawhill.pdf.
LevineJames A.PittEdward W., 1995. New Expectations: Community Strategies for Responsible Fatherhood. New York: Families and Work Institute.
68.
LewisRobert. 1997. Raising a Modern-Day Knight A Focus on the Family Book. Wheaton, IL: Tyndale House.
69.
LockhartWilliam H.2000. “We Are One Life, but Not of One Gender Ideology: Unity, Ambiguity, and the Promise Keepers.”Sociology of Religion61: 73–92.
70.
LukerKristin. 1984. Abortion and the Politics of Motherhood. Berkeley: University of California Press.
71.
LukerKristin. 1996. Dubious Conceptions: The Politics of Teenage Pregnancy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
72.
MackeyWade C.1985. Fathering Behaviors: The Dynamics of the Man-Child Bond. New York: Plenum Press.
73.
MovementMarriage. 2000. The Marriage Movement: A Statement of Principles. Retrieved April 20, 2001. http://www.marriagemovement.org/.
74.
MarsiglioWilliamDayRandalEvansJ.LambMichaelBraverSanfordPetersE., 1998. “Report of the Working Group on Conceptualizing Male Parenting.” Pp. 101–74 in Nurturing Fatherhood: Improving Data and Research on Male Fertility, Family Formation and Fatherhood. Washington, DC: Federal Interagency Forum on Child and Family Statistics.
75.
MarsiglioWilliamDayRandal D.LambMichael E., 2000. “Exploring Fatherhood Diversity: Implications for Conceptualizing Father Involvement. Marriage and Family Review29: 75–97.
76.
McCartneyBill. 2000. Transcript of 4th and Goal, March 2, March 20, April 26, June 29, August 3, September 7. Promise Keepers. Retrieved July 20, 2001. http://www.4thandgoal.org.
77.
MessnerMichael. 1997. “Chapter 2, Essentialist Retreats: The Mythopoetic Men's Movement and the Christian Promise Keepers.” Pp. 16–35 in MessnerM., Politics of Masculinities: Men in Movements. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
78.
MintzSteven. 1998. “From Patriarchy to Androgyny and Other Myths: Placing Men's Family Roles in Historical Perspective.” Pp. 3–30 in Men in Families: When Do They Get Involved? edited by BoothA.CrouterA. C., Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
79.
MorrisAldon. 2000. “Reflections on Social Movement Theory: Criticisms and Proposals.”Contemporary Sociology29(3): 445–54.
80.
MurrayCharles. 2001. Family Formation. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
PalkovitzRob. 1997. “Reconstructing ‘Involvement’: Expanding Conceptualizations of Men's Caring in Contemporary Families.” Pp. 200–16 in Generative Fathering: Beyond Deficit Perspectives, edited by HawkinsA. J.DollahiteD. C., Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
85.
PalmGlen. 1997. “Promoting Generative Fathering through Parent and Family Education.” Pp. 167–82 in Generative Fathering: Beyond Deficit Perspectives, edited by HawkinsA. J.DollahiteD. C., Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
86.
PopenoeDavid. 1996. Life without Father: Compelling New Evidence That Fatherhood and Marriage Are Indispensable for the Good of Children and Society. New York: Martin Kessler/Free Press.
87.
PopenoeDavid. 1999. “Challenging the Culture of Fatherlessness.” Pp. 17–24 in The Fatherhood Movement: A Call to Action, edited by HornW. F.BlankenhornD.PearlsteinM. B., Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
88.
PruettKyle D.1987. The Nurturing Father. New York: Warner Books.
89.
PruettKyle D.1993. “The Paternal Presence.”Families in Society74: 46–50.
90.
PykeKarenColtraneScott. 1996. “Entitlement, Obligation, and Gratitude in Family Work.”Journal of Family Issues16: 60–82.
SpectorMalcolmKitsuseJohn I., 1987. Constructing Social Problems. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
99.
StaceyJudith. 1996. In the Name of the Family: Rethinking Family Values in the Postmodern Age. Boston: Beacon Press.
100.
StaceyJudith. 1998. Brave New Families: Stories of Domestic Upheaval in Late Twentieth Century America. New York: Basic Books.
101.
StaceyJudith. 2001. “Family Values Forever: In the Marriage Movement, Conservatives and Centrists Find a Home Together.”Nation273(2): 26–30.
102.
StanleyScottTrathenDanielMcCainSavannaBryanMilt. 1998. A Lasting Promise: A Christian Guide to Fighting for Your Marriage. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
103.
Van LeeuwenMary Stewart. 1997. “Servanthood or Soft Patriarchy? A Christian Feminist Looks at the Promise Keepers Movement.”Journal of Men's Studies5: 233–61.
104.
WaiteLinda J.GallagherMaggie. 2000. The Case for Marriage: Why Married People Are Happier, Healthier, and Better Off Financially. New York: Doubleday.
105.
White House, Office of the Press Secretary. 2001. “Executive Order: Establishment of White House Office of Faith-based and Community Initiatives.” January 29.
106.
WilcoxClyde. 1992. God's Warriors. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
107.
WilcoxClyde. 1994. “Premillenialists at the Millennium: Some Reflections on the Christian Right in the Twenty-first Century.”Sociology of Religion55: 243–61.
108.
WilliamsRhys H.2000. “Promise Keepers: A Comment on Religion and Social Movements.”Sociology of Religion61: 1–10.
109.
WuthnowRobert. 1993. “The Future of the Religious Right.” Pp. 27–47 in No Longer Exiles, edited by CromartieM., Washington, DC: Ethics and Public Policy Center.
