We examine the processes by which states pass hate crime laws. We argue that states' decisions to enact such legislation are influenced by both state characteristics and the monitoring of the actions of other states. We find that the repeal of a sodomy law in a state does not increase its rate of enactment, but as more and more states enact hate crime laws, those that have repealed their sodomy laws are more likely to follow suit. We also find that states in which the political party of the governor differs from that of the majority of legislators are more likely to become referents to this process, so that once they have enacted a hate crime law, others quickly follow suit. We find no support for the claim that hate crime laws diffused within regions. Finally, with regard to state-level characteristics, we find that wealthier states with Democrat-dominated legislatures that have been policy innovators in the past have higher rates of enactment. Those states that have passed an earlier, less controversial hate crime law have lower rates of enactment.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BartholmewDavid J.1982. Stochastic Models for Social Practice. 3d ed. New York: Wiley.
2.
BerryFrances Stokes. 1994. “Sizing Up State Policy Innovation Research”. Policy Studies Journal22(3): 442–57.
3.
BerryFrances StokesBerryWilliam D., 1990. “State Lottery Adoptions as Policy Innovations: An Event History Analysis.”American Political Science Review84(2): 395–415.
4.
BinderAmy. 2000. “Why Do Some Curricular Challenges Work While Others Do Not? The Case of Three Afrocentric Challenges.”Sociology of Education73: 69–91.
5.
BoliJohnRamirezFranciscoMeyerJohn. 1985. “Explaining the Origins and Expansion of Mass Education.”Comparative Education Review29: 145–70.
6.
ComstockGary D.1991. Violence against Lesbians and Gay Men. New York: Columbia University Press.
7.
DavisGerald F.GreveHenrich. 1997. “Corporate Elite Networks and Governance Changes in the 1980s.”American Journal of Sociology103: 1–37.
8.
DiMaggioPaul J.PowellWalter W., 1983. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.”American Sociological Review48: 147–60.
9.
EarlJenniferSouleSarah A., 2001. “The Differential Protection of Minority Groups: The Inclusion of Sexual Orientation, Gender, and Disability in State Hate Crime Laws, 1976–1995. The Politics of Social Inequality9: 1–31.
10.
EricksonKai. 1966. Wayward Puritans: A Study in the Sociology of Deviance. New York: Wiley.
11.
FineMorrisHimmelfarbMilton. 1970. American Jewish Yearbook. Vol. 71. New York: American Jewish Committee.
12.
FriedlandRogerAlfordRobert R., 1991. “Bringing Society Back In: Symbols, Practices, and Institutional Contradictions.” Pp. 232–63 in The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, edited by PowellW. W.DiMaggioP. J., Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13.
GoldschmidtJane. 1998. Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, and Transgender Civil Rights Laws in the U.S. Washington, DC: Policy Institute of the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force.
14.
GrattetRykenJennessValerieCurryTheodore R., 1998. “Innovation and Diffusion in U.S. Hate Crime Law.”American Sociological Review63: 286–307.
15.
GrayVirginia. 1973. “Innovation in the States: A Diffusion Study.”American Political Science Review76: 1174–85.
16.
GreveHenrich. 1995. “Jumping Ship: The Diffusion of Strategy Abandonment.”Administrative Science Quarterly40: 444–73.
17.
GreveHenrichStrangDavidTumaNancy Brandon. 1995. “Specification and Estimation of Heterogenous Diffusion Models.” Pp. 377–420 in Sociological Methodology, edited by MarsdenP. V., New York: Blackwell.
18.
Haider-MarkelDonald. 1998. “The Politics of Social Regulatory Policy: State and Federal Hate Crime Policy and Implementation Effort.”Political Research Quarterly51(1): 69–88.
19.
HecloHugh. 1974. Modern Social Politics in Britain and Sweden. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
20.
HilgartnerStephenBoskCharles L., 1988. “The Rise and Fall of Social Problems: A Public Arenas Model.”American Journal of Sociology94: 53–78.
21.
HimmelfarbMiltonSingerDavid. 1980. American Jewish Yearbook. Vol. 80. New York: American Jewish Committee.
22.
JacobsJames B.1998. “The Emergence and Implications of American Hate Crime Jurisprudence.” Pp. 150–77 in Hate Crime: The Global Politics of Polarization, edited by KellyR. J.MaghanJ., Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
23.
JacobsJames B.HenryJessica S., 1996. “The Social Construction of a Hate Crime Epidemic.”Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology86(2): 366–91.
24.
JacobsJames B.PotterKimberly. 1998. Hate Crimes: Criminal Law and Identity Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
25.
JennessValerieGrattetRyken. 1996. “The Criminalization of Hate: A Comparison of Structural and Polity Influences on the Passage of ‘Bias-Crime’ Legislation in the United States.”Sociological Perspectives39: 129–54.
26.
JostKenneth. 1993. “Background: Violence and Prejudice.”CQ Researcher3(1): 7–15.
27.
KraatzMathew S.ZajacEdward J., 1996. “Exploring the Limits of the New Institutionalism: The Causes and Consequences of Illegitimate Organizational Change.”American Sociological Review61: 812–36.
28.
KnokeDavid. 1982. “The Spread of Municipal Reform: Temporal, Spatial, and Social Dynamics.”American Journal of Sociology87: 1314–39.
29.
LutzChris. 1987. They Don't All Wear Sheets: A Chronology of Racists and Far Right Violence, 1980–1986. Atlanta, GA: Center for Democratic Renewal.
30.
McDevittJackLevinJack. 1993. Hate Crimes: The Rising Tide of Bigotry and Bloodshed. New York: Plenum Press.
31.
MeyerJohn W.HannanMichael T., 1979. National Development and the World System: Educational, Economic, and Political Change, 1950–1970. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32.
IndexNewsBank Electronic. 1998. NewsBank: Index to Periodicals on CD-ROM (Computer File from NewsBank Reference Service Plus). New Canaan, CT: NewsBank, Inc.
33.
OliverChristine. 1991. “Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes.”Academy of Management Review16(1): 45–179.
34.
OlzakSusan. 1992. The Dynamics of Ethnic Competition and Conflict. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
35.
PowellWalter W.DiMaggioPaul J., 1991. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
36.
RogersEverett M.1983. Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Wiley.
37.
RosenbergDavid. 1997. Hate Crimes Laws. New York: Anti-Defamation League.
38.
SavageRobert. 1978. “Policy Innovativeness as a Trait of the American States.”Journal of Politics40(1): 212–24.
39.
ScottW. Richard. 1991. “Unpacking Institutional Arguments.” Pp. 164–82 in The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, edited by PowellW. W.DiMaggioP. J., Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
40.
SingerDavid. 1995. American Jewish Yearbook. Vol. 95. New York: American Jewish Committee.
41.
SkocpolThedaAbend-WeinMarjorieHowardChristopherLehmannSusan Goodrich. 1993. “Women's Associations and the Enactment of Mothers' Pensions in the United States.”American Political Science Review87: 686–98.
42.
SkocpolThedaAmentaEdwin. 1986. “States and Social Policies.”Annual Review of Sociology12: 131–57.
43.
SouleSarah A.1995. “The Student Anti-Apartheid Movement in the United States: Diffusion of Protest Tactics and Policy Reform. Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University.
44.
SouleSarah A.1997. “The Student Divestment Movement in the United States and Tactical Diffusion: The Shantytown Protest.”Social Forces75: 855–83.
45.
SouleSarah A.Van DykeNella. 1999. “Black Church Arson in the United States, 1989–1996.”Ethnic and Racial Studies22(4): 724–42.
46.
SouleSarah A.ZylanYvonne. 1997. “Runaway Train? The Diffusion of State-Level Reform to A(F)DC Eligibility Requirements, 1950–1967”American Journal of Sociology103: 733–62.
47.
StrangDavid. 1990. “From Dependency to Sovereignty: An Event History Analysis of Decolonization 1870–1987.”American Sociological Review55: 846–60.
48.
StrangDavid. 1991. “Adding Social Structure to Diffusion Models: An Event History Framework.”Sociological Methods and Research19: 324–53.
49.
StrangDavid. 1992. With Nancy Brandon Tuma and John Meyer. “Global Diffusion of National Policies.” Research Proposal to the National Science Foundation.
50.
StrangDavid. 1995. “mhdiff: User Documentation.” Technical Report 95–3. Cornell University, Department of Sociology.
51.
StrangDavidMeyerJohn W., 1993. “Institutional Conditions for Diffusion.”Theory and Society22: 487–511.
52.
StrangDavidSouleSarah A., 1998. “Diffusion in Organizations and Social Movements: From Hybrid Corn to Poison Pills.”Annual Review of Sociology24: 265–90.
53.
StrangDavidTumaNancy Brandon. 1993. “Spatial and Temporal Heterogeneity in Diffusion.”American Journal of Sociology99: 614–39.
54.
SuttonJohn R.1991. “The Political Economy of Madness: The Expansion of the Asylum in Progressive America.”American Sociological Review56: 665–78.
55.
SuttonJohn R.1996. “Rethinking Social Control.”Law and Social Inquiry21: 943–58.
56.
SuttonJohn R.DobbinFrank. 1996. “The Two Faces of Governance: Responses to Legal Uncertainty in U.S. Firms, 1955 to 1985.”American Sociological Review61: 794–811.
57.
TarrowSidney. 1994. Power in Movement: Social Movements, Collective Action, and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
58.
ThomasGeorge M.MeyerJohn W.RamirezFranciscoBoliJohn. 1987. Institutional Structure Constituting State, Society, and the Individual. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
59.
TolbertPamelaZuckerLynne. 1983. “Institutional Sources of Change in the Formal Structure of Organizations: The Diffusion of Civil Service Reform, 1880–1935.”Administrative Science Quarterly28: 22–39.
60.
TumaNancy BrandonHannanMichael T., 1984. Social Dynamics: Models and Methods. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
61.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1970. Statistical Abstract of the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
62.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1980. Statistical Abstract of the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
63.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1990. Statistical Abstract of the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
64.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1995. Statistical Abstract of the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
65.
Van DykeNellaSouleSarah A.WidomRebecca. 2001. “The Politics of Hate: Explaining Variation in the Incidence of Anti-Gay Hate Crime.”The Politics of Social Inequality9: 69–93.
66.
WangLu-In1995. Hate Crimes Laws. New York: Clark, Boardman, Callaghan.
67.
WrightGerald C.EriksonRobertMcIverJohn P., 1985. “Measuring State Partisanship and Ideology with Survey Data.”Journal of Politics47: 469–89.
68.
ZylanYvonne. 1995. “The Divided Female State: Gender, Citizenship, and U.S. Social Policy Development, 1945–1990.” Ph.D. dissertation, New York University.
