Abstract
The goal of JERHRE is to provide empirical evidence that enables researchers and ethics committees to interpret ethical principles sensibly. The range of topics in this issue exemplifies the kinds of questions that call for empirical evidence: How to think about protecting research data from subpoena; Revised how to work with communities of stigmatized individuals; Revised how to understand and meet the needs of vulnerable pediatric populations in developing countries; Revised how to facilitate ethical decision making in the context of gaining informed consent from prospective participants in clinical trials; Revised and how to best educate students in courses on research ethics. The discussion questions posed in this article are designed to produce critical thinking among people who have read the articles in this issue. The following questions are best addressed in the context of group discussion.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.