Efforts to increase community members' involvement in research may create novel ethical challenges. We describe an ongoing randomized trial of a peer-delivered intervention to encourage hypertension self-management. Community members serving as peer leaders participate in subject recruitment, the informed consent process, and intervention. We describe our experience with several ethical issues that may arise when conducting research in similar settings: (1) coercion of community members, by the community, to participate either as leaders or as study subjects; (2) threats to the privacy of health information; and (3) conflict between peer leaders' roles as community members and study team members.
AhmedS. M. & PalermoA. G. (2010). Community engagement in research: Frameworks for education and peer review. American Journal of Public Health, 100(8), 1380–1387.
2.
AlcalayR.AlvaradoM.BalcazarH.NewmanE., & HuertaE. (1999). Salud para su Corazón: A community-based Latino cardiovascular disease prevention and outreach model. Journal of Community Health, 24(5), 359–379.
3.
The American Legion. (2010). History of the American Legion. Retrieved August 1, 2010 from http://www.legion.org/history.
4.
AndersonE. E. (2010). The role of community-based organizations in the recruitment of human subjects: Ethical considerations. The American Journal of Bioethics, 10(3), 20–21.
5.
BalcázarH.AlvaradoM.HollenM. L.Gonzalez-CruzY., & PedregónV. (2005). Evaluation of Salud Para Su Corazon (Health for Your Heart): National Council of La Raza Promotora Outreach Program. Preventing Chronic Disease, 2(3), A09.
6.
BastidaE. M.TsengT.McKeeverC., & JackL.Jr. (2010). Ethics and community-based participatory research: Perspectives from the field. Health Promotion Practice, 11(1), 16–20.
7.
BodenheimerT.LorigK.HolmanH., & GrumbachK. (2002). Patient self-management of chronic disease in primary care. Journal of the American Medical Association, 288(19), 2469–2475.
8.
BrownsteinJ. N.BoneL. R.DennisonC. R.HillM. N.KimM. T., & LevineD. M. (2005). Community health workers as interventionists in the prevention and control of heart disease and stroke. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 29(5Suppl. 1), 128–133.
9.
BuunkB. P.DoosjeB. J.JansL.G., & HopstakenL. E. (1993). Perceived reciprocity, social support and stress at work: The role of exchange and communal orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(4), 801–811.
10.
ChobanianA. V.BakrisG. L.BlackH. R.CushmanW. C.GreenL. A.IzzoJ. L. (2003). The seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: The JNC 7 Report. Journal of the American Medical Association, 289(19), 2560–2572.
11.
EganB. M.ZhaoY., & AxonR. N. (2010). U.S. trends in prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension, 1988–2008. Journal of the American Medical Association, 303(20), 2043–2050.
12.
FadimanA. (1997). The Spirit Catches You and You Fall Down: A Hmong Child, Her American Doctors, and the Collision of Two Cultures. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.
13.
HayesA.MorzinskiJ.ErtlK.WurmC.PattersonL.WilkeN. (2010). Preliminary description of the feasibility of using peer leaders to encourage hypertension self-management. Wisconsin Medical Journal, 109(2), 29–34.
14.
National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1979). The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research. Federal Register, 44(76), 23192–23197.
15.
SimonC. & MosavelM. (2010). Community members as recruiters of human subjects: Ethical considerations. American Journal of Bioethics, 10(3), 3–11.
WebelA. R.OkonskyJ.TrompetaJ., & HolzemerW. L. (2010). A systematic review of the effectiveness of peer-based interventions on health-related behaviors in adults. American Journal of Public Health, 100(2), 247–253.
19.
WendlerD.KrohmalB.EmanuelE. J., & GradyC. (2008). Why patients continue to participate in clinical research. Archives of Internal Medicine, 168(12), 1294–1299.
