If empirical estimates of disclosure risk are included in informed consent statements for surveys or other forms of research, participants must be able to understand the information provided. Using data from an online vignette-based experiment, this article explores the role that numeracy or quantitative literacy may play in comprehension of disclosure risk. Results suggest that less numerate persons are less sensitive to extreme differences in the disclosure risk described in the hypothetical vignettes.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd ed.Philadelphia, PA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2.
CouperM. P.SingerE.ConradF. G., & GrovesR. M. (2008). Risk of disclosure, perceptions of risk, and concerns about privacy and confidentiality as factors in survey participation. Journal of Official Statistics, 24(2), 1–22.
3.
CouperM. P.SingerE.ConradF. G., & GrovesR. M. (2009). Experimental studies of disclosure risk, disclosure harm, topic sensitivity, and survey participation. Draft paper under review.
4.
BergenmarM.MolinC.WilkingN. & BrandbergY. (2008). Knowledge and understanding among cancer patients consenting to participate in clinical trials. European Journal of Cancer, 44(17), 2627–2633.
5.
DonelleL.Hoffman-GoetzL., & ArochaJ. (2007). Assessing health numeracy among community-dwelling older adults. Journal of Health Communication, 12(7), 651–665.
6.
FagerlinA.Zikmund-FisherB.UbelP.JankovikA.DerryH., & SmithD. (2007). Measuring numeracy without a math test: Development of the subjective numeracy scale. Medical Decision Making, 27, 672–680.
7.
HochhauserM. (2008). Consent comprehension in the 21st century: What is missing?Drug Information Journal, 42(4), 375–384.
8.
KishL. (1987). Statistical design for research. New York, NY: John Wiley.
9.
LipkusI.SamsaG., & RimerB. (2001). General performance on a numeracy scale among highly educated samples. Medical Decision Making, 21, 37–44.
10.
McNuttL.WaltermaurerE.BednarczykR.CarlsonB.KotvalJ.McCauleyJ.CampbellJ., & FordD. (2008). Are we misjudging how well informed consent forms are read?Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 3(1), 89–97.
11.
ParkerR. M.BakerD. W.WilliamsM. V., & NurssJ. R. (1995). The test of functional health literacy in adults: A new instrument for measuring patients' literacy skills. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 10, 537–541.
12.
RaghunathanT.LepkowskiJ.Van HoewykJ., & SolenbergerP. (2001). A multivariate technique for multiply imputing missing values using a sequence of regression models. Survey Methodology, 27(1), 85–95.
13.
RaghunathanT.LepkowskiJ.Van HoewykJ. & SolenbergerP. (2005). IVEware: A software for the analysis of complex survey data with or without multiple imputations. University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research, (www.isr.umich.edu/src/smp/ive).
14.
RaghunathanT.ReiterJ., & RubinD. (2003). Multiple imputation for disclosure limitation. Journal of Official Statistics, 19, 1–16.
15.
ReiterJ. (2009). Using multiple imputation to integrate and disseminate confidential microdata. International Statistical Review, 77(2), 179–195.
16.
RothmanR.MontoriV.CherringtonA., & PignoneM. (2008). Perspective: The role of numeracy in health care. Journal of Health Communication, 13, 583–595.
17.
SchwartzL.WoloshinS.BlackW., & WelchH. G. (1997). The role of numeracy in understanding the benefit of screening mammography. Annals of Internal Medicine, 127(11), 966–972.
18.
SingerE. (1978). Informed consent: Consequences for response rate and response quality in social surveys. American Sociological Review, 43, 144–162.
19.
SingerE. (1993). Informed consent in surveys: A review of the empirical literature. Journal of Official Statistics, 9, 361–375.
20.
SingerE.Van HoewykJ., & NeugebauerR. (2003). Attitudes and behavior: The impact of privacy and confidentiality concerns on participation in the 2000 census. Public Opinion Quarterly, 65, 368–384.
21.
ZarateA. & ZayatzL. (2006). Essentials of the disclosure review process: A federal perspective. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 1(3), 51–62.
22.
Zikmund-FisherB.UbelP.SmithD., & FagerlinA. (2007). Validation of the subjective numeracy scale: Effects of low numeracy on comprehension of risk communication and utility elicitations. Medical Decision Making, 27, 672–680.
