Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

We administered debriefing probes to gauge respondent discomfort in reaction to sensitive questions. These probes assessed respondents' own reactions to being asked to report on substance use (subjective discomfort), as well as their beliefs about the reaction of others (projective discomfort). We investigated whether a sample of men from the general population were more uncomfortable with questions about drug use than a sample of men who have sex with men (MSM) surveyed from the same city (Chicago). We also investigated whether those who disclosed drug use on the survey experienced higher levels of discomfort. Contrary to opinions often expressed as research ethics committee (REC) recommendations, questions about drug use do not generate much subjective discomfort. MSM did not differ from the general population with respect to subjective discomfort. General population males did, however, report higher levels of “drug specific” projective discomfort. Respondents disclosing recent drug use reported higher levels of subjective discomfort. Implications for the REC practice, researcher and REC education, and directions for future research are discussed.

Keywords

respondent reaction subjective discomfort warning clauses informed consent

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aday

(1996). Designing and Conducting Health Surveys (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Bargh

J.A.

& Chartrand

T.L.

(2000). A practical guide to priming and automaticity research. In Reis

H.T.

& Judd

C.M.

(Eds.), Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology. (pp. 253–285) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bradburn

N.M.

Sudman

Blair

, & Stocking

(1978). Question threat and response bias. Public Opinion Quarterly, 221–234.

Fendrich

Johnson

T.P.

Wislar

J.S.

Hubbell

, & Spiehler

(2004). The utility of drug testing in epidemiological research: Results from a general population survey. Addiction, 99(2), 197–208.

Fendrich

Wislar

, & Johnson

T.P.

(2003). The utility of debriefing questions in a household survey on drug abuse. Journal of Drug Issues, 33(2), 267–284.

Groves

R.M.

& Couper

M.P.

(1998). Nonresponse in Household Surveys. New York: Wiley.

Groves

R.M.

Dillman

D.A.

Eltinge

J.L.

, & Little

R.J.A.

, Eds. (2002). Survey Nonresponse. New York: Wiley.

Harrison

Martin

S.S.

Enev

, & Harrington

(2007). Comparing Drug Testing and Self-Report of Drug Use among Youths and Young Adults in the General Population. (DHHS Publication No. SMA 07-4249, Methodology Series M-7). Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Office of Applied Studies.

Lee

E.S.

Folrthofer

R.N.

, & Lorimor

R.J.

(1989). Analyzing Complex Survey Data. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

10.

Singer

Hippler

H.J.

, & Schwarz

(1992). Confidentiality assurances in surveys: Reassurance or threat? International Journal of Public Opinion, 4(3), 256–268.

11.

StataCorp. 2005. Stata Statistical Software: Release 9.0. College Station, TX: Stata Corporation.

12.

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2006). Results from the 2005 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: National Findings (Office of Applied Studies, NSDUH series H-30, DHHS publication No. SMA 06-4194). Rockville, MD.

13.

Tourangeau

Rips

L.J.

, & Rasinski

(2000). The Psychology of Survey Response. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

14.

Willis

(2006). Cognitive interviewing as a tool for improving the informed consent process. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 1(1), 9–24.

Respondent Reactions to Sensitive Questions

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References