We have witnessed our universities becoming neoliberal institutions as monetary goals surmount academic ones and knowledge becomes a commodity. As professors in a neoliberal institution, we mourn in this moment as we are forced to become skilled at negotiating the power of neoliberalism and our qualitative passion for social justice. Although this mourning manifests itself on multiple fronts, after outlining our ethics and sharing personal vignettes, we discuss the ethical tensions of teaching qualitative research, a marginalized paradigm, in this neoliberal moment.
BhattacharyaK. (2015). The vulnerable academic: Personal narratives and strategic de/colonizing of academic structures. Qualitative Inquiry, 22, 309–321. doi:10.1177/1077800415615619
4.
BogueR. (2007). Deleuze's way: Essays in transverse ethics and aesthetics.Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
5.
BraidottiR. (2006). Transpositions: On nomadic ethics.Maiden, MA: Polity Press.
6.
CaputoJ. D. (1993). Against ethics: Contributions to a poetics of obligation with constant reference to deconstruction.Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
7.
DaviesB. (2009). Deleuze and the arts of teaching and research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 22, 625–630. doi:10.1080/09518390903143650
8.
DaviesB., & BanselP. (2007). Neoliberalism and education. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 20, 247–259. doi:10.1080/09518390701281751
9.
DeleuzeG. (1997). Negotiations (M. Joughin, Trans.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
10.
DeleuzeG., & GuattariF. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
11.
DenzinN. K., & LincolnY. S. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
GirouxH. A. (2007). The university in chains: Confronting the military-industrial-academic complex.Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
13.
GoodchildP. (1996). Deleuze & Guattari: An introduction to the politics of desire.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14.
Hickey-MoodyA., & MalinsP. (Eds.). (2007). Deleuzian encounters: Studies in contemporary social issues.New York, NY: Palgrave.
15.
KubyC. R., AguayoR. C., HollowayN., MulliganJ., ShearS. B., & WardA. (2015). Teaching, troubling, transgressing: Thinking with theory in a post-qualitative inquiry course. Qualitative Inquiry, 22, 140–148. doi:10.1177/1077800415617206
16.
LucalB. (2015). 2014 Hans O. Mauksch address: Neoliberalism and higher education: How a misguided philosophy undermines teaching sociology. Teaching Sociology, 43, 3–14. doi:10.1177/0092055X14556684
17.
SlaughterS., & RhoadesG. (2000). The neo-liberal university. New Labor Forum, 6, 73–79.
18.
St. PierreE. A., & RoulstonK. (2006). The state of qualitative inquiry: A contested science. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19, 673–684. doi:10.1080/09518390600975644
19.
WilliamsJ. (2003). Gilles Deleuze's difference and repetition: A critical introduction and guide.Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.
20.
WrightH. K. (2006). Are we (t)here yet? Qualitative research in education's profuse and contested present. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19, 793–802. doi:10.1080/09518390600979273
