In this article, we trace the rise of autoethnography from its modest beginning as a form of indigenous ethnography through its inception as a mode of resistance to conventional ethnographic writing practices and silent authorship to its introduction as a narrative identity and covering term. Autoethnography has become a genus for many diverse species of first-person, vulnerable writing that calls attention to subjectivity, emotionality, and contingency and brings readers into “feeling” contact with the suffering of others. We emphasize the importance of the community spirit fostered by the first decade of the International Congress of Qualitative Inquiry, which embraced, promoted, and gave special attention to autoethnographic writing and performance, thereby strengthening the standing of autoethnography in the human sciences. The Congress provides a model of solidarity and a sense of shared values and purposes emblematic of meaningful communities.
AdamsT. E., & Holman JonesS. (2008). Autoethnography is queer. In DenzinN. K., LincolnY. S., & SmithL. T. (Eds.), Handbook of critical and indigenous methodologies (pp. 373–390). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2.
BeckerE. (1968). The structure of evil: An essay on the unification of the science of man.New York, NY: George Braziller.
3.
BochnerA. P. (2012). Terms of perfection.The Review of Communication, 12, 3–20. doi:10.1080/15358593.2011.621091
4.
BochnerA. P. (2014). Coming to narrative: A personal history of paradigm change in the human sciences.Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
5.
BochnerA. P., & EllisC. (1992). Personal narrative as a social approach to interpersonal communication.Communication Theory, 2, 165–172. doi:10.1111/j,1468–2885.1992.tb00036.x
6.
BochnerA. P., & EllisC. (1996). Talking over ethnography, In EllisC., & BochnerA. P. (Eds.), Composing ethnography: Alternative forms of qualitative writing (pp. 13–45). Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
7.
BochnerA. P., & EllisC. (2002). Ethnographically speaking: Autoethnography, literature, and aesthetics.Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
8.
BochnerA. P., EllisC., & Tillmann-HealyL. (1997). Relationships as stories, In DuckS. (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships (2nd ed., pp. 307–324). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.
9.
BochnerA. P., & RiggsN. A. (2014). Practicing narrative inquiry. In LeavyP. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of qualitative research (pp. 195–222). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
10.
BrandesS. (1982). Ethnographic autobiographies in American anthropology. In HoebelE. A., CurrierR., & KaiserS. (Eds.), Crisis in anthropology: View from Spring Hill, 1980 (pp. 187–202). New York, NY: Garland.
11.
BrunerJ. (1990). Acts of meaning.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12.
CaugheyJ. L. (1982). Ethnography, introspection, and reflexive culture studies.Prospects, 7, 115–139. doi: 10.1017/S0361233300003483
13.
ChangH. (2008). Autoethnography as method.Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
14.
CliffordJ., & MarcusG. E. (Eds.). (1986). Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography.Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
15.
ConquergoodD. (1990). Rethinking ethnography: Cultural politics and rhetorical strategies. Paper presented at the Temple Conference on Discourse Analysis, Temple UniversityPhiladelphia, PA.
16.
CrawfordL. (1996). Personal ethnography.Communication Monographs, 63, 158–170. doi:10.1080/03637759609376384
17.
DenzinN. K. (1997). Interpretive ethnography: Ethnographic practices for the 21st century.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
DouglasK., & CarlessD. (2013). A history of autoethnographic inquiry. In Holman JonesS., AdamsT. E., & EllisC. (Eds.), Handbook of autoethnography (pp. 84–106). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
19.
EllisC. (1995). Final negotiations: A story of love, loss, and chronic illness.Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
20.
EllisC. (1997). Evocative autoethnography: Writing emotionally about our lives, In TierneyW. G., & LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Representation and the text: Re-framing the narrative voice (pp. 115–139) Albany: State University of New York Press.
21.
EllisC. (1998). Exploring loss through autoethnographic inquiry: Autoethnographic storytelling, co-constructed narrative, and interactive interviewing. In HarveyJ. H. (Ed.), Perspectives on loss: A sourcebook (pp. 49–61). Philadelphia, PA: Brunner/Mazel.
22.
EllisC. (2004). The ethnographic I: A methodological novel about autoethnography.Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
23.
EllisC. (2009). Revision: Autoethnographic reflections on life and work.Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
24.
EllisC., & AdamsT. E. (2014). The purposes, practices, and principles of autoethnographic research. In LeavyP. (Ed.), Oxford handbook of qualitative research (pp. 254–276). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
25.
EllisC., & BochnerA. P. (1991). Multiple voices, metanarratives, and lived experience: A case study of choice and constraint. Paper presented at the Society for the Study of Symbolic Interaction Stone Symposium, San Francisco, CA.
26.
EllisC., & BochnerA. P. (1992). Telling and performing personal stories: The constraints of choice in abortion. In EllisC., & FlahertyM. G. (Eds.), Investigating subjectivity: Research on lived experience (pp. 79–101). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
27.
EllisC., & BochnerA. P. (Eds.). (1996a). Composing ethnography: Alternative forms of qualitative writing.Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
28.
EllisC., & BochnerA. P. (Eds.) (1996b). Taking ethnography into the twenty-first century [Special issue].Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 25(1).
29.
EllisC., & BochnerA. P. (2000). Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity: Researcher as subject. In DenzinN. K., & LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 733–768). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30.
HayanoD. M. (1979). Auto-ethnography: Paradigms, problems, and prospects.Human Organization, 38, 99–104. doi:10.17730/humo.38.1.u761n5601t4g318v
31.
HeiderK. (1975). What do people do? Dani auto-ethnography.Journal of Anthropological Research, 31, 3–17.
32.
Holman JonesS. (2005). Autoethnography: Making the personal political. In DenzinN. K., & LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 763–791). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33.
Holman JonesS., & AdamsT. E. (2010). Autoethnography and queer theory: Making possibilities. In DenzinN. K., & GiardinaM. G. (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry and human rights (pp. 136–157). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
34.
Holman JonesS., AdamsT. E., & EllisC. (Eds). (2013). Handbook of autoethnography.Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
35.
HydeM. J. (2010). Perfection: Coming to terms with being human.Waco, TX: Baylor University Press.
36.
JacksonM. (1989). Paths toward a clearing: Radical empiricism and ethnographic inquiry.Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
37.
KriegerS. (1991). Social science and the self: Personal essays on an art form.New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
38.
LyotardJ.-F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge (G. Bennington & B. Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
39.
Reed-DanahayD. E. (Ed.). (1997). Auto/ethnography: Rewriting the self and the social.New York, NY: Berg.
40.
RortyR. (1982). Consequences of pragmatism.Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
41.
RortyR. (1989). Contingency, irony, and solidarity.Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
42.
RortyR. (1991). Objectivity, relativism and truth: Philosophical papers (Vol. 1). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
