This article's point of departure is practicing an(other) methodology than those that are dominant within educational research in Norway. Dominant research can ‘rely on the authority and normativity of methods to produce knowledge devoid of critical reflection and contextual consideration’ (Koro-Ljungberg & Mazzei, 2012, p. 728). Koro-Lungberg (2012) calls this the politics of simplification (p. 809), which is powerful through its control of qualitative research. The authors try to poke holes in this scheme of representation regarding cultural diversity by installing themselves in agentic realist positions with a piece of data – a snapshot of an Internet Web page. To think otherwise about cultural diversity, the authors ‘thinkfeel’ (Lenz Taguchi & Palmer, in press) and are on the ‘lookout’ (Boutang, 2011) for events and transformative moments (Deleuze & Guattari, 1987) around the folding of the assemblage of cultural diversity in Norway. Inspired by Lather (2012), we try ‘to live’ the data in new ways.
BaradK. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter.Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28, 801–831. doi:10.1086/345321
5.
BaradK. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning.London: Duke University Press.
6.
BaradK. (2010). Quantum entanglements and hauntological relations of inheritance: Dis/continuities, spacetime enfoldings, and justice-to-come.Derrida Today, 3, 240–268. doi:10.3366/E1754850010000813
7.
BennettJ. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things.Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
8.
BiestaG. (2011). Disciplines and theory in the academic study of education: A comparative analysis of the Anglo-American and Continental construction of the field.Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 19, 175–192. doi:10.1080/14681366.2011.582255
9.
BoutangP.-A. (2011). Gilles Deleuze from A to Z (with Clair Parnet) [DVD], Semiotext (e).
10.
CannellaG. S., & ManuelitoK. D. (2008). Feminism from unthought locations: Indigenous worldviews, marginalized feminisms, and revisioning an anticolonial social science. In DenzinN. K., LincolnY. S., & SmithL. T. (Eds.), Handbook of critical and indigenous methodologies (pp. 45–59). Los Angeles: Sage.
DeleuzeG., & GuattariF. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). London: Continuum.
13.
DeleuzeG., & GuattariF. (1994). What is philosophy? (H. Tomlinson & G. Burchell, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.
14.
DerridaJ. (2002). Acts of religion (AnidjarG., Ed.). London: Routledge.
15.
DerridaJ. (2005). On touching (C. Irizarry, Trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
16.
GiugniM. (2010). “Becoming worldly with”: An encounter with the early years learning framework.Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 12, 11–27. doi:10.2304/ciec.2011.12.1.11
17.
GullestadM. (2007). Misjonsbilder. Bidrag til norsk selvforståelse [Missionary images: A contribution to a Norwegian understanding of self]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
18.
HaggertyK. D., & EricsonR. V. (2000). The surveillant assemblage.The British Journal of Sociology, 51, 605–622. doi:10.1080/00071310020015280
19.
HekmanS. (2008). Constructing the ballast: An ontology for feminism. In AlaimoS., & HekmanS. (Eds.), Material feminisms (pp. 85–119). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
20.
JonesL., MacLureM., HolmesR., & MacRaeC. (2012). Children and objects: Affection and infection.Early Years: An International Research Journal, 32, 49–60. doi:10.1080/09575146.2011.593029
21.
Koro-LjungbergM. (2012). Researchers of the world, create!Qualitative Inquiry, 18, 808–818. doi:10.1177/1077800412453014
22.
Koro-LjungbergM., & MazzeiL. A. (2012). Problematizing methodological simplicity in qualitative research: Editors’ introduction.Qualitative Inquiry, 18, 728–731. doi:10.1177/1077800412453013
LawJ. (2000). On the subject of the object: Narrative, technology, and interpellation.Configurations, 8, 1–29. doi:10.1353/con.2000.0003
25.
Lenz TaguchiH. (2010). Going beyond the theory/practice divide in early childhood education: Introducing an intra-active pedagogy.London: Routledge.
26.
Lenz TaguchiH. (2012). A diffractive and Deleuzian approach to analyzing interview data.Feminist Theory, 13, 265–281. doi:10.1177/1464700112456001
27.
Lenz TaguchiH., & PalmerA. (in press). A more “liveable” school? A diffractive analysis of the perfomative enactments of girl's ill- and wellbeing with(in) school environments. Submitted to Qualitative Inquiry.
28.
LykkeN. (2010). The timeliness of post-constructionism.Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 18, 131–136. doi:10.1080/08038741003757760
29.
MacLureM. (2011). Qualitative inquiry: Where are the ruins?Qualitative Inquiry, 17, 997–1005. doi:10.1177/1077800411423198
30.
MacLureM. (2013). Classification or wonder? Coding as an analytic practice in qualitative research. In ColemanR., & RingroseJ. (Eds.), Deleuze and research methodologies (pp. 164–183). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
31.
MulinariD., KeskinenS., IrniS., & TuoriS. (2009). Introduction: Postcolonialism and the Nordic models of welfare and gender. In KeskinenS., TuoriS., IrniS., & MulinariD. (Eds.), Complying with colonialism: Gender, race and ethnicity in the Nordic region (pp. 1–16). Surrey: Ashgate.
32.
OlkowskiD. (1999). Gilles Deleuze and the ruin of representation.Berkeley: University of California Press.
33.
OzgaJ. (2007). Knowledge and policy: Research and knowledge transfer.Critical Studies in Education, 48, 63–78. doi:10.1080/17508480601120988
34.
OzgaJ. (2009). Governing education through data in England: From regulation to self-evaluation.Journal of Education Policy, 24, 149–162. doi:10.1080/02680930902733121
35.
OzgaJ., & JonesR. (2006). Travelling and embedded policy: The case of knowledge transfer.Journal of Education Policy, 21, 1–17. doi:10.1080/02680930500391462
36.
ReinertsenA. B., RyenA., OtterstadA. M., & Ben-HorinO. (2013). The inefficiency of knowledge and the limits of explanations; the necessity of critique.Qualitative Inquiry, 19, 147–162. doi:10.1177/1077800412466047
Rhedding-JonesJ. (2007). Who chooses what research methodology? In HatchJ. A. (Ed.), Early childhood qualitative research (pp. 207–221). New York: Routledge.
39.
RossholtN. (2012). Children's bodies in time and place; an onto-epistemological approach.Reconceptualizing Educational Research Methodology, 3(2), 16–25.
40.
SandvikN. (2012). Rethinking the idea/ideal of pedagogical control: Assemblages of del stabilisation.Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 13, 200–209. doi:10.2304/ciec.2012.13.3.200
SemetskyI. (2010). The folds of experience, or: Constructing the pedagogy of values.Educational Philosophy and Theory, 42, 476–488. doi:10.1111/j,1469-5812.2008.00486.x
