In this paper, we traverse both historical and contemporary discourses pertaining to early childhood care and education in Aotearoa New Zealand, offering a genealogical discursive analysis of assumptions of white superiority. It is proposed that such an analysis delivers a platform from which to launch a project of unmasking the recent and ongoing impact of neoliberal policies in our country. Two key documents are highlighted: the founding document of our nation, Te Tiriti o Waitangi/The Treaty of Waitangi, and the New Zealand early childhood curriculum, Te Whāriki. These documents are unusual both within our country, and internationally, in that they offer a framework for bi-epistemological approaches to both education and social organisation more widely. Revisiting these documents in the context of uncovering the subtle racism that underpins assumptions of white superiority provides a platform for countercolonial, ethical reenvisioning of our educational becomings.
BallaraA. (1986). Proud to be white? A survey of Pakeha prejudice in New Zealand.Auckland: Heinemann.
2.
BignallS. (2007). Indigenous peoples and a Deleuzian theory of practice. In Hickey-MoodyA., & MalinsP. (Eds.), Deleuzian encounters: Studies in contemporary social issues (pp. 197–211). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
3.
CannellaG. S. (2011). Political possibility, hypercapitalism, and the “conservative reeducation machine.”Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 11, 364–368. doi:10.1177/1532708611414667
4.
CarpenterV. (2009, July 15). Education, teachers and the children of the poor. Keynote address at the Researching Professionals Symposium, University of Otago College of EducationDunedin.
5.
ChestersG. (2007). Complex and minor: Deleuze and the alterglobalization movement(s). In Hickey-MoodyA., & MalinsP. (Eds.), Deleuzian encounters: Studies in contemporary social issues (pp. 236–250). Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
6.
CopeP., & I'AnsonJ. (2003). Forms of exchange: Education, economics and the neglect of social contingency.British Journal of Educational Studies, 51, 219–232. doi:10.1111/1467-8527.t01-l-00236
7.
DeleuzeG., & GuattariF. (2004a). Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (R. Hurley, M. Seem & H. R. Lane, Trans.). London: Continuum.
8.
DeleuzeG., & GuattariF. (2004b). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). London: Continuum.
HenareM., PuckeyA., NicholsonA., DaleC. M., & VaithianathanR. (2011, August). He ara hou: The pathway forward. Getting it right for Aotearoa New Zealand's Maori and Pasifika children.Wellington: Every Child Counts. Retrieved from http://www.everychildcounts.org.nz/
14.
MacLureM. (2011). Qualitative inquiry: Where are the ruins?Qualitative Inquiry, 17, 997–1005. doi:10.1177/1077800411423198
15.
MayH. (2001). Politics in the playground: The world of early childhood in postwar New Zealand.Wellington: Bridget Williams Books.
16.
McCarthyC., PittonV., KimS., & MonjeD. (2009). Movement and stasis in the neoliberal reorientation of schools. In AppleM. W., AuW., & GandinL. A. (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of critical education (pp. 36–50). New York: Routledge.
17.
MeadL. T. T. R. (1996). Ngā Aho o te Kākahu Mātauranga: The multiple layers of struggle by Māori in education (Doctoral dissertation). The University of AucklandAuckland. Retrieved from https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/handle/2292/942
18.
MikaereA. (2004). The balance destroyed: The consequences for Maori women of the colonisation of Tikanga Maori.Auckland: International Research Institute for Maori and Indigenous Education.
19.
Ministry of Education. (1993). Te Whāriki: Draft guidelines for developmentally appropriate programmes in early childhood.Wellington: Learning Media.
MitaM. (1994). Trick or treat: Issues of feminism and post-colonialism in relation to the arts.Te Pua, 3(1), 37–41.
23.
NuttallJ. (2003). Exploring the role of the teacher within Te Whāriki: Some possibilities and constraints. In NuttallJ. (Ed.), Weaving Te Whāriki: Aotearoa New Zealand's early childhood curriculum document in theory and practice (pp. 161–187). Wellington: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.
24.
OrangeC. (1987). The treaty of Waitangi.Wellington: Allen and Unwin.
25.
PetersM. A. (2001). Poststructuralism, Marxism, and neoliberalism: Between theory and politics.Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
26.
PihamaL. (1993). No, I will not be a post…Te Pua, 2(1-2), 35–37.
27.
RauC. (2007). Shifting paradigms: Maori women at the interface of Te Tiriti (Treaty) based early childhood education in Aotearoa.Childrenz Issues, 11(1), 33–36.
28.
RitchieJ. (1996). Tino Rangatiratanga and the implementation of Te Whäriki. In MayH., & CarrM. (Eds.), Implementing Te Whāriki, Te Whāriki papers 2 (pp. 77–88). Wellington and Hamilton: Institute for Early Childhood Studies, Victoria University of Wellington, and Department of Early Childhood Studies, University of Waikato.
29.
RitchieJ. (2003a). Te Whāriki as a potential lever for bicultural development. In NuttallJ. (Ed.), Weaving Te Whāriki: Aotearoa New Zealand's early childhood curriculum document in theory and practice (pp. 79–109). Wellington: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.
30.
RitchieJ. (2003b). Whakawhanaungatanga: Dilemmas for mainstream New Zealand early childhood education of a commitment to bicultural pedagogy. Paper presented at the 11th Reconceptualizing Early Childhood Conference, January 5–12, Tempe, Arizona.
31.
RitchieJ., & JohnsonA. (2011). Early childhood care and education. In DaleM. C., O'BrienM., & St.JohnS. (Eds.), Left further behind: How policies fail the poorest children in New Zealand (pp. 159–174). Auckland: Child Poverty Action Group.
32.
RitchieJ., & RauC. (2010). Kia mau ki te wairuatanga: Countercolonial narratives of early childhood education in Aotearoa. In CannellaG. S., & SotoL. D. (Eds.), Childhoods: A handbook (pp. 355–373). New York: Peter Lang.
33.
RobertsonS. L., & DaleR. (2009). The World Bank, the IMF, and the possibilities of critical education. In AppleM., AuW., & GandinL. A. (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of critical education (pp. 23–35). New York: Routledge.
34.
RoffeJ. (2007). The revolutionary dividual. In Hickey-MoodyA., & MalinsP. (Eds.), Deleuzian encounters: Studies in contemporary social issues (pp. 40–49). Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
35.
SaltmanK. J. (2009). Corporatization and the control of schools. In AppleM., AuW., & GandinL. A. (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of critical education (pp. 51–63). New York: Routledge.
36.
SellersM. A. (2009). Re(con)ceiving children in curriculum: Mapping (a) milieu(s) of becoming (Doctoral dissertation). The University of Queensland.
37.
SimonJ. (1989). Aspirations and ideology: Biculturalism and multiculturalism in New Zealand education.Sites, 18, 23–34.
38.
SimonJ. (1996). Good intentions, but … In SteeleR. (Ed.), Whakamana Tangata (pp. 38–42). Wellington: Quest Rapuara.
SkerrettM. (2012). Counter colonization through Maori language revitalization in Aotearoa/ New Zealand. Paper presented at the 20th Reconceptualizing Early Childhood Education Conference, Pennsylvania State UniversityState College, PA.
41.
SmithL. T. (1999/2006). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and Indigenous peoples.Dunedin: Zed Books.
TooleyC. W. R. (2000). Maori education policy in the new millennium: Political rationality and government mechanisms (Master's thesis). The University of AucklandAuckland. Retrieved from https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/
45.
Waitangi Tribunal. (2011). Ko Aotearoa tēnei: A report into claims concerning New Zealand law and policy affecting Maori culture and identity. Te taumata tuatahi (Wai 262). Wellington: Author.
46.
Weber-PillwaxC. (2001). What is Indigenous research?Canadian Journal of Native Education, 25(2), 166–174.
47.
WilkinsonR., & PickettK. (2010). The spirit level: Why equality is better for everyone.London: Penguin.
