This paper develops a theory of rights that operates on a middle ground between ethnocentric universalism and cultural relativism. It does so by arguing that rights are derived from basic human vulnerabilities, which are situated and contextual. It is argued that advancing human rights is a legitimate goal for the human and social sciences and that all such sciences need a qualitative understanding of situated rights and duties in order to understand their subject matters. It is also argued that the emerging neo-positivism in the social sciences, in particular psychology, is detrimental to producing knowledge about human rights and rights violations, and that this may seriously affect our capacities for self-understanding and moral action. A tentative way forward is sketched that involves the education of students in a way that will sensitize them to human rights and vulnerabilities.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlldredP., & GilliesP. (2002). Eliciting Research Accounts: Re/producing Modern Subjects. In MautherM., BirchM., JessopJ., & MillerT. (Eds.), Ethics in Qualitative Research. (pp. 113–129). London: Sage.
2.
BellahR.N., MadsenR., SullivanW. M., SwidlerA., and TiptonS. M. (1985). Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life.Berkeley: University of California Press.
3.
BrinkmannS. (2004). Psychology as a Moral Science: Aspects of John Dewey's psychology.History of the Human Sciences, 17, 1–28.
4.
BrinkmannS. (2007a). Practical reason and positioning.Journal of Moral Education, 36, 415–432.
5.
BrinkmannS. (2007b). The good qualitative researcher.Qualitative Research in Psychology, 4, 127–144.
6.
ColesR. (1992). Self/Power/Other: Political Theory and Dialogical Ethics.Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
7.
DenzinN. K., & LincolnY. S. (2005). Preface. In DenzinN.K., & LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research. (Third Edition). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
8.
DeweyJ. (1900). Psychology and Social Practice.The Psychological Review, 7, 105–124.
9.
DeweyJ. (1922). Human Nature and Conduct: An Introduction to Social Psychology. (This edition published 1930). New York: The Modern Library.
10.
DeweyJ. (1927). The Public and its Problems — An Essay in Political Inquiry. (This edition published 1946). Chicago: Gateway Books.
11.
FieldsA. B. (2003). Rethinking human rights for the new millennium.New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
12.
FieldsA. B. (2009). Human rights theory: Criteria, boundaries, and complexities.Paper presented at the Fifth International Congress of Qualitative Inquiry at the University of Illinois, Urbana- Champaign.
13.
FlyvbjergB. (2001). Making Social Science Matter — Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14.
FoucaultM. (1977). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison.New York: Pantheon.
15.
FoucaultM. (1980). The History of Sexuality, Volume 1: An Introduction.New York: Random House.
16.
GergenK. (2001a). Psychological Science in a Postmodern Context.American Psychologist, 56, 803–813.
17.
GergenK. J. (2001b). Social Construction in Context.London: Sage.
18.
HabermasJ. (1990). Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action.Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
19.
HackingI. (1986). Making Up People. In HellerT.C., SosnaM., & WellberyD. (Eds.), Reconstructing Individualism. (pp. 222–236). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
HarréR. (2005). An Ontology for Duties and Rights. In FinkelN.J., & MoghaddamF. M. (Eds.), The Psychology of Rights and Duties: Empirical Contributions and Normative Commentaries. (pp. 223–241). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
22.
HarréR., & MoghaddamF. M. (2003). Introduction: The Self and Others in Traditional Psychology and in Positioning Theory. In HarréR., & MoghaddamF. M. (Eds.), The Self and Others: Positioning Individuals and Groups in Personal, Political, and Cultural Contexts. (pp. 1–11). London: Praeger.
23.
HarréR., & RobinsonD. N. (1995). On the Primacy of Duties.Philosophy, 70, 513–532.
24.
HarréR., & van LangenhoveL. (1999). The Dynamics of Social Episodes. In HarréR., & van LangenhoveL. (Eds.), Positioning Theory. (pp. 1–13). Oxford: Blackwell.
25.
HolidayA. (1988). Moral Powers: Normative Necessity in Language and History.London: Routledge.
26.
HusserlE. (1954). Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die tranzendentale Phänomenologie.Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.
27.
JonasH. (1992). The Burden and Blessing of Mortality.Hastings Center Report, 22, 34–40.
28.
KvaleS. (2003). The Church, the Factory and the Market: Scenarios for psychology in a Postmodern Age.Theory & Psychology, 13, 579–603.
29.
KvaleS. (2008). Qualitative inquiry between scientistic evidentialism, ethical subjectivism and the free market.International Review of Qualitative Research, 1, 5–18.
30.
LevineP. (1998). Living Without Philosophy: On Narrative, Rhetoric, and Morality.Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
31.
LøgstrupK. E. (1956). The Ethical Demand. (This edition published 1997). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
32.
MackieJ. (1977). Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong.Hammondsworth: Penguin Books.
33.
McGinnC. (1999). The Meaning and Morality of Lolita.The Philosophical Forum, 30, 31–41.
34.
NussbaumM. C. (1990). The Discernment of Perception: An Aristotelian Conception of Private and Public Rationality. In Love's Knowledge. (pp. 54–105). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
35.
OsbeckL. (1993). Social Constructionism and the Pragmatic Standard.Theory & Psychology, 3, 337–349.
36.
ParkerI. (2005). Qualitative Psychology: Introducing Radical Research.Buckingham: Open University Press.
37.
RichardsonF. C., & WoolfolkR. L. (1994). Social Theory and values: A Hermeneutic Perspective.Theory & Psychology, 4, 199–226.
38.
RortyR. (1989). Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39.
RoseN. (1996a). Inventing Our Selves: Psychology, Power, and Personhood.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40.
RoseN. (1996b). Power and subjectivity: Critical history and psychology. In GraumannC.F., & GergenK. J. (Eds.), Historical Dimensions of Psychological Discourse. (pp. 103–124). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41.
SchwandtT. (2000). Three Epistemological Stances for Qualitative Inquiry: Interpretivism, Hermeneutics, and Social Constructionism. In DenzinN.K., & LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research. (pp. 292–331). London: Sage.
42.
SennettR. (2006). The Culture of the New Capitalism.New Haven: Yale University Press.
43.
TurnerB. S. (1993). Outline of a theory of human rights.Sociology, 27, 489–512.
