Business schools have attracted a growing number of more critical scholars, especially in the last few years. However, in ways that are analogous to other social sciences, the critical scholarship produced in business schools may be coming under threat from evidence-based practices — in this case, “Evidence-based Management” So this essay reflects on the implications of evidence-based management and suggests some ways in which its threats might be resisted.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlvessonMats, and WillmottHugh (eds) (1992). Critical Management Studies.London: Sage
DenzinNorman K., and GiardinaMichael (2006). eds. Qualitative Inquiry and the Conservative Challenge.Walnut Creek, Ca: Left Coast Press.
4.
EdwardsN. (2003). ‘What Type of Research do NHS Managers Find Useful?’ Keynote Speech at the Second National SDO Conference: Delivering Research for Better Health Services, 19 March 2003.
FournierValérie, and GreyChristopher (2000). ‘At the Critical Moment: Conditions and prospects for critical management studies’Human Relations53(1): 7–32.
7.
FoxNick J. (2003). “Practice-based Evidence: Towards Collaborative and Transgressive Research,”Sociology, 37(1): 81–102.
8.
GreyChristopher, WillmottHugh (eds) (2005). Critical Management Studies: A reader.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9.
HarrisonStephen (1998). ‘The Politics of Evidence-Based Medicine’, Policy and Politics, 26(1): 15–31.
10.
HollowayJacky (2007). ‘Where's The Evidence For Evidence Based Management?’, paper presented at the ESRC Seminar series ‘Advancing research in the business and management field’, 18 May, Oxford Brookes Business School.
11.
LambertHelen, GordonElisa, and Bogdan-LovisElizabeth (2006). ‘Introduction: Gift Horse or Trojan Horse? Social Science Perspectives on Evidence-based Health Care’, Social Science & Medicine, 62(11): 2613–20.
12.
LearmonthMark (2003). ‘Making Health Services Management Research Critical: A review and a suggestion’, Sociology of Health & Illness, 25(1): 93–119.
13.
LearmonthMark (2006). ‘Is There Such a Thing As “Evidence-Based Management”?: A Commentary on Rousseau's 2005 Presidential Address’, Academy of Management Review, 31(4): 1089–91.
14.
LearmonthMark, HardingNancy (2006). ‘Evidence-based Management: The very idea’, Public Administration, 84(2): 245–66.
15.
LincolnYvonna S., CanellaGaile S. (2004). ‘Dangerous Discourses: Methodological conservatism and governmental regimes of truth’, Qualitative Inquiry, 10(1): 5–14.
16.
MorrellKevin (2008). ‘The Narrative of “Evidence-based” Management: A polemic’, Journal of Management Studies.45(3): 613–635.
17.
PfefferJeffrey, SuttonRobert (2006). Hard Facts, Dangerous Half-Truths and Total Nonsense: Profiting from Evidence-based Management.Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
18.
ReedyPatrick (2008). ‘Mirror, Mirror, on the Wall: Reflecting on the Ethics and Effects of a Collective Critical Management Studies Identity Project’Management Learning, 39(1): 57–72.
19.
ReidBenjamin, SpinksNigel (2007). ‘Effacing the Facts: Critical Realism and the Politics of Evidence’, paper presented at the 3rd International Congress of Qualitative Inquiry, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, May 2–5.
20.
RousseauDenise M. (2006a). ‘Is There Such a Thing As “Evidence-Based Management”?’, Academy of Management Review, 31(2): 256–69.
21.
RousseauDenise M. (2006b). ‘Keeping An Open Mind About EBM: A Reply to Learmonth's Commentary’, Academy of Management Review, 31(4): 1091–3.
22.
SDO (2006). Annual Report 2006: NHS Service Delivery and Organisation R&D Programme.London: NCCSDO.
