A historical assessment of the Leninist conception of imperialism is the necessary foundation for a theoretical periodi-zation of capitalism, in which the current developments and rising globalization have led to a dialectical supersession of imperialism. The emerging new stage of capitalism is characterized as transnational or totalitarian capitalism. The structural characteristics and basic trends of this new stage of capitalism stand in interesting contrast to the theoretical conception of Empire, proposed by Hardt and Negri. The former approach offers a more adequate framework for understanding the current restructuring of capitalism and a safer political guide for the emancipating working-class struggle towards a socialist supersession of capitalism.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
RobertAlbritton. 2001. “Capitalism in the Future Perfect Tense.” Pp. 125–140 in Albritton, et al.
2.
AlbrittonRobert, ., eds. 2001. Phases of Capitalist Development: Booms, Crises and Globalizations. New York: Palgrave.
3.
SamirAmin. 1999. “Capitalism, Imperialism, Globalization.” Pp. 157–168 in ChilcoteRonald, ed., The Political Economy of Imperialism: Critical Appraisals. London/Boston: Kluwer Academic Press.
4.
SamirAmin. 2000. “The Political Economy of the Twentieth Century.”Monthly Review, 52:2, 1–17.
5.
JairusBanaji. 2003. “The Fictions of Free Labour: Contract, Coercion, and the So-Called Unfree Labour.”Historical Materialism, 11:3, 69–95.
6.
BeckerDavid G., . 1987. Postimperialism, International Capitalism, and Development in the Twentieth Century. Boulder, Colorado: Lynne Rienner.
7.
BerchBerberoglu. 1987. The Internationalization of Capital: Imperialism and Capitalist Development on a World Scale. New York: Praeger.
8.
BinaCyrus, and YaghmaianBehzad. 1991. “Post-War Global Accumulation and the Transnationalisation of Capital.”Capital & Class, 43.
9.
BlautJ. M. 1997. “Evaluating Imperialism.”Science & Society, 61:3, 382–93.
10.
RobertBrenner. 1998. “The Economics of Global Turbulence.”New Left Review, 229.
11.
AnthonyBrewer. 1989. Marxist Theories of Imperialism: A Critical Survey. London and New York: Routledge.
12.
SimonBromley. 2003. “Reflections on Empire, Imperialism and United States Hegemony.”Historical Materialism, 11:3, 17–68.
13.
DickBryan. 1995. The Chase Across the Globe: International Accumulation and the Contradictions for Nation States. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
14.
DickBryan. 2001. “Global Accumulation and Accounting for National Economic Identity.”Review of Radical Political Economics, 33:1, 57–77.
15.
BurbachRoger, and RobinsonWilliam. 1999. “The Fin De Siecle Debate: Globalization as Epochal Shift.”Science & Society, 63:1, 10–39.
16.
PeterBurnham. 2001. “Marx, International Political Economy and Globalization.”Capital & Class, 75.
AlexCallinicos. 2001. “Toni Negri in Perspective.”International Socialist Journal, 92.
19.
PaulCammack. 2003. “The Governance of Global Capitalism: A New Materialist Perspective.”Historical Materialism, 11:2, 37–59.
20.
GuglielmoCarchedi. 1991. Frontiers of Political Economy. London: Verso.
21.
PareshChattopadhyay. 1994. The Marxian Concept of Capital and the Soviet Experience. Westport, Connecticut: Praeger.
22.
PareshChattopadhyay. 2002. Review essay on Bertell Ollman, et. al., Market Socialism: The Debate Among Socialists and Michael Howard, Self-Management and the Crisis of Socialism. Historical Materialism, 10:1, 223–250.
23.
PareshChattopadhyay. 2003. “Two Approaches to Socialist Revolution: Marx versus Lenin-Trotsky.”Paper presented to the Conference “The Work of Karl Marx and the Challenges of the 21st Century.”Havana, Cuba, May5-8.
24.
RonaldChilcote. 1999. “Introduction.” Pp. 1–16 in ChilcoteRonald, ed., The Political Economy of Imperialism: Critical Appraisals. London/Boston, Massachusetts: Kluwer Academic Press.
25.
CoxRobert W.1987. Production, Power and World Order. New York: Columbia University Press.
26.
PeterDrahos. 1995. “Global Property Rights in Information: The Story of TRIPS at the GATT.”Prometheus, 13:1, 6–19.
27.
DuménilGérard, and LévyDominique. 2001. “Periodizing Capitalism: Technology, Institutions and Relations of Production.” Pp. 141–162 in Albritton, et al.
28.
Dyer-WithefordNick. 2001. “Empire, Immaterial Labor, the New Combinations, and the Global Worker.”Rethinking Marxism, 13:3/4, 70–80.
29.
FineBen, and HarrisLaurence. 1979. Rereading Capital. New York: Columbia University Press.
30.
FosterJohn Bellamy. 2001. “Imperialism and ‘Empire’.”Monthly Review, 53:7, 1–9.
31.
FosterJohn Bellamy. 2002. “Monopoly Capital and the New Globalization.”Monthly Review, 53:8, 1–16.
32.
FosterJohn Bellamy. 2003. “The New Age of Imperialism.”Monthly Review, 55:3, 1–14.
33.
GordonDavid. 1988. “The Global Economy: New Edifice or Crumbling Foundations?”New Left Review, 168.
34.
PeterGreen. 2002. “‘The Passage from Imperialism to Empire’: A Commentary on Empire by Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri.”Historical Materialism, 10:1, 29–77.
35.
GriffinKeith, and GurleyJohn. 1985. “Radical Analyses of Imperialism, the Third World, and the Transition to Socialism: A Survey Article.”Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. XXIII, 1089–1143.
36.
RobertGuttmann. 1994. How Credit-Money Shapes the Economy: The United States in a Global System. Armonk, New York: M. E. Sharpe.
37.
HardtMichael, and NegriAntonio. 2000. Empire. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
38.
JerryHarris. 1999. “Globalization and the Technological Transformation of Capitalism.”Race & Class, 40:2/3, 21–35.
39.
HirstPaul, and ThompsonGraham. 1996. Globalisation in Question. London: Polity.
40.
JohnHolloway. 1994. “Global Capital and the National State.”Capital & Class, 52.
41.
UrsulaHuws. 1999. “Material World: The Myth of the ‘Weightless Economy’.” Pp. 29–55 in The Socialist Register 1999. London: Merlin Press.
42.
RhysJenkins. 1987. Transnational Corporations and Uneven Development: The Internationalization of Capital and the Third World. London and New York: Methuen.
43.
ClaudioKatz. 2002. “L'imperialisme du XXIe siecle.”Inprecor, 474 (September).
44.
DavidKotz. 2001. “The State, Globalization and Phases of Capitalist Development.” Pp. 93–109 in Albritton, et. al.
45.
DavidLaibman. 1984. “Modes of Production and Theories of Transition.”Science & Society, 48:3, 257–294.
46.
DavidLaibman. 2005. “Theory and Necessity: The Stadial Foundations of the Present.”Science & Society (in this issue).
47.
LeninVladimir Ilyich. 1961. Collected Works, Volumes II, III.Moscow: Progress Publishers.
48.
LeninVladimir Ilyich. 1974. Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism. New York: International Publishers.
49.
LindseyCharles W.1982. “Lenin's Theory of Imperialism.”Review of Radical Political Economics, 14:1, 1–9.
50.
GeorgeLiodakis. 2000. “The New Stage of Totalitarian Capitalism and the European Economic Integration.”Utopia, 39. (In Greek.)
51.
GeorgeLiodakis. 2001. “The Discussion on ‘Globalization’, the Internationalization of Capital and the Changing Role of the State.”Utopia, 46. (In Greek.)
52.
GeorgeLiodakis. 2003. “The Role of Biotechnology in the Agro-Food System and the Socialist Horizon.”Historical Materialism, 11:1, 37–74.
53.
AngusMaddison. 1982. Phases of Capitalist Development. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
54.
HarryMagdoff. 1969. The Age of Imperialism. New York: Monthly Review Press.
55.
ErnestMandel. 1975. Late Capitalism. London: New Left Books.
56.
ErwinMarquit. 1981. “Contradictions in Dialectics and Formal Logic.”Science & Society, 45:3, 306–323.
57.
KarlMarx. 1967. Capital. New York: International Publishers.
58.
KarlMarx. 1974. “The Civil War in France.” Pp. 274–313 in MarxKarl and EngelsFrederic, Selected Works. New York: International Publishers.
59.
MavroudeasStavros, and IoannidesAlexis. 2002. “Stages of Capitalist Development: Is There a New Stage in Process?” Presented at the 6th Annual Conference of ESHET, University of Crete, Rethymno, March 14–17.
60.
TerrenceMcDonough. 1995. “Lenin, Imperialism, and the Stages of Capitalist Development.”Science & Society, 59:3, 339–67.
61.
McMichaelPhilip, and MyhreDavid. 1991. “Global Regulation vs. the National-State: Agro-Food Systems and the New Politics of Capital.”Capital & Class, 43.
62.
DavidMcNally. 1999. “The Present as History: Thoughts on Capitalism at the Millennium.”Monthly Review, 51:3, 134–145.
63.
MészárosIstván. 2001. Socialism or Barbarism. New York: Monthly Review Press.
64.
DavidNoble. 1995. Progress Without People: New Technology, Unemployment, and the Message of Resistance. Toronto, Canada: Between the Lines.
65.
LeoPanitch. 1994. “Globalisation and the State.” Pp. 60–93 in Socialist Register 1994. London: The Merlin Press.
66.
LeoPanitch. 1998. “‘The State in a Changing World’: Social-Democratizing Global Capitalism?”Monthly Review, 50:5, 11–22.
67.
LeoPanitch. 2001. In GowanPeter, PanitchLeo and ShawMartin, “The State, Globalisation and the New Imperialism: A Roundtable Discussion.”Historical Materialism, 9, 3–38.
68.
PanitchLeo, and GindinSam. 2002. “Gems and Baubles in Empire.”Historical Materialism, 10:2, 17–43.
69.
JonathanPerraton. 2001. “The Global Economy — Myths and Realities.”Cambridge Journal of Economics, 25, 669–84.
70.
PerratonJonathan, . 1997. “The Globalisation of Economic Activity.”New Political Economy, 2:2, 257–77.
71.
JamesPetras. 2002. “A Rose by Any Other Name? The Fragrance of Imperialism.”The Journal of Peasant Studies, 29:2, 135–160.
72.
NicosPoulantzas. 1975. Classes in Contemporary Capitalism.London: New Left Books.
73.
HugoRadice. 2001. “Globalisation, Labour and Socialist Renewal.”Capital & Class, 75.
74.
WilliamRobinson. 2001. “Global Capitalism and National State-Centric Thinking — What We Don't See When We Do See Nation-States: Response to Critics.”Science & Society, 65:4, 500–508.
75.
RobinsonWilliam, and HarrisJerry. 2000. “Towards a Global Ruling Class? Globalization and the Transnational Capitalist Class.”Science & Society, 64:1, 11–54.
76.
MartinShaw. 1997. “The State of Globalization: Towards a Theory of State Transformation.”Review of International Political Economy, 4:3, 497–513.
77.
TillaSiegel. 1984. “Politics and Economics in the Capitalist World Market: Methodological Problems of Marxist Analysis.”International Journal of Sociology, 14:1, 1–105.
78.
LeslieSklair. 2001. The Transnational Capitalist Class. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
79.
Science & Society.2002. Special Issue: “Building Socialism Theoretically: Alternatives to Capitalism and the Invisible Hand.”DevinePat, ed. Science & Society, 66:1.
80.
UNCTAD.2002. World Investment Report: Transnational Corporations and Export Competitiveness. New York and Geneva: United Nations.
81.
Van ApeldoornBastiaan. 1998. “Transnationalization and the Restructuring of Europe's Socioeconomic Order: Social Forces in the Construction of ‘Embedded Neoliberalism’.”International Journal of Political Economy, 28:1, 12–53.
82.
WeeksJohn. 1985–86. “Epochs of Capitalism and the Progressiveness of Capital's Expansion.”Science & Society, 49:4 414–36.
83.
LindaWeiss. 1998. “Globalization and the Myth of the Powerless State.”New Left Review, 225.
84.
WentRobert. 2002-03. “Globalization in the Perspective of Imperialism.”Science & Society, 66:4473–497.
85.
RichardWestra. 2001. “Phases of Capitalism and Post-Capitalist Social Change.” Pp. 301–317 in Albritton, et. al.
86.
RichardWestra. 2002. “Marxian Economic Theory and an Ontology of Socialism: A Japanese Intervention.”Capital & Class, 78.
87.
JohnWilloughby. 1995. “Evaluating the Leninist Theory of Imperialism.”Science & Society, 59:3, 320–38.
88.
JohnWilloughby. 1997. “Rejoinder to Blaut.”Science & Society, 61:3, 393–95.
89.
Wood MeiksinsEllen. 1999. “Unhappy Families: Global Capitalism in a World of Nation-States.”Monthly Review, 51:3, 1–12.
90.
BehzadYaghmaian. 1998. “Globalization and the State: The Political Economy of Global Accumulation and Its Emerging Mode of Regulation.”Science & Society, 62:2, 241–65.
