Joseph Dietzgen (1828-1888) had an important role in the history of Marxism. One reason for this is that he coined the phrase “dialectical materialism” — the hallmark of “orthodox” Marxism. Another reason is that at the beginning of the 20th century, in the absence of Marx's early writings, humanist critics of “orthodox” Marxism like Anton Pannekoek appealed to Dietzgen. An understanding of Dietzgen's thought sheds new light on our understanding of “dialectical materialism” and on the debate between “orthodox” and “Hegelian” Marxists.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdoratskyVladimir. 1934. Dialectical Materialism: The Theoretical Foundation of Marxism-Leninism. London: Martin Lawrence.
2.
AndersonPerry. 1979. Considerations on Western Marxism. London: Verso.
3.
BottomoreTom. 1961. “Introduction.”Pp. 17—43 in Tom B. Bottomore and Maxi-milien Rubel, eds., Karl Marx: Selected Writings in Sociology and Philosophy. Har-mondsworth: Penguin.
4.
BottomoreTom. 1991. A Dictionary of Marxist Thought. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
5.
Bricianer, Serge, ed. 1978. Pannekoek and the Workers’ Councils. Saint Louis, Missouri: Telos Press.
BurnsTony. 2000. “Materialism in Ancient Greek Philosophy and in the Writings of the Young Marx.” Historical Materialism, 7, 3–40.
8.
CameronKenneth N.1995. Dialectical Materialism and Modern Science. New York: International Publishers.
9.
ClarkeSimon. 1998. “Was Lenin a Marxist? The Populist Roots of Marxism-Leninism.” Historical Materialism, 3, 3–27.
10.
CollettiLucio. 1977. “Introduction.” Pp. 8–56 in Marx, 1977.
11.
DietzgenEugene. 1917. “Joseph Dietzgen: A Sketch of His Life.” Pp. 7–34 in Joseph Dietzgen, 1917.
12.
DietzgenJoseph. 1961. Schriften in Drei Bänden. Herausgegeben von der Arbeitsgruppe für Philosophie an der Deutschen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.
13.
DietzgenJoseph. 1961a (1869). Das Wesen der menschlichen Kopfarbeit. Pp. 15–139 in Dietzgen, 1961, Vol. I.
14.
DietzgenJoseph. 1961b (1870-75). “Die Religion der Sozialdemokratie.” Pp. 182–268 in Dietzgen, 1961, Vol. I.
15.
DietzgenJoseph. 1961c (1876). “Sozialdemokratische Philosophie.” Pp. 335–387 in Dietzgen, 1961, Vol. 1.
16.
DietzgenJoseph. 1961d (1877). “Die Grenzen der Erkenntnis.” Pp. 49–60 in Dietzgen, 1961, Vol. IL
17.
DietzgenJoseph. 1961e (1887). “Streifzüge eines Sozialisten in das Gebiet der Erkennis-theorie.” Pp. 29–130 in Dietzgen, 1961, Vol. III.
18.
DietzgenJoseph. 1961f (1887). “Das Akquisit der Philosophie.” Pp. 189–299 in Dietzgen, 1961, Vol. III.
19.
DietzgenJoseph. 1961g (1867-82). Letters to Marx. Pp. 399–435 in Dietzgen, 1961, Vol. III.
20.
DietzgenJoseph. 1917. Philosophical Essays: On Socialism and Science, Religion, Ethics, Critique-of-Reason and the World-at-Large. Ed.DietzgenE. & DietzgenJ.Jr., tr. BeerM. & Th. Rothstein, with a biographical sketch and some introductory remarks by Eugene Dietzgen. Chicago, Illinois: Charles H. Kerr.
21.
DietzgenJoseph. 1917a (1875). “The Ethics of Social Democracy.” Pp. 155–72 in Dietzgen, 1917.
22.
DietzgenJoseph. 1917b (1876). “Social Democratic Philosophy.” Pp. 173–223 in Dietzgen, 1917.
23.
DietzgenJoseph. 1917c (1877). “The Limits of Cognition.” Pp. 224–35 in Dietzgen, 1917.
24.
DietzgenJoseph. 1917d (1887). “Excursions of a Socialist into the Domain of Epistemology.” Pp. 263–362 in Dietzgen, 1917.
25.
DietzgenJoseph. 1928 (1906). The Positive Outcome of Philosophy: The Nature of Human Brain Work, Letters on Logic, The Positive Outcome of Philosophy. Tr. E. Untermann, intro.
26.
PannekoekA., ed. DietzgenE. and DietzgenJ.Jr., Second edition. Chicago, Illinois: Charles Kerr.
27.
PannekoekA. 1928a (1869). “The Nature of Human Brain Work.” Pp. 67–182 in Dietzgen, 1928.
28.
PannekoekA.1928b. “The Positive Outcome of Philosophy.” Pp. 319–428 in Dietzgen, 1928.
29.
EastonLloyd. 1958. “Empiricism and Ethics in Dietzgen.” Journal of the History of Ideas, 1, 77–90.
30.
EdgleyRoy. 1991. “Dialectical Materialism.” Pp. 142–3 in Bottomore, 1991.
31.
EmmettDorothy. 1928. “Joseph Dietzgen: The Philosopher of Proletarian Logic.” Journal of Adult Education, 3, 26–35.
32.
EngelsFriedrich. 1952. Ludwig Feuerbach und der Ausgang der Massischen deutschen Philosophie. In Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, Ausgewählte Schriften in zwei banden. Berlin.
33.
EngelsFriedrich. 1998a (1934; 1878). Anti-Dühring: Herr Eugen Dühring's Revolution in Science.
34.
Tr. Emile Burns. Ed. C. P.Dutt. London: Martin Lawrence. Cd-Rom version. London: Electric Book Co.
35.
Tr. Emile Burns. Ed. C. P.1998b (1934; 1903; 1886). Ludwig Feuerbach and the End of Classical German Philosophy. Tr. A. Lewis. Ed. C. P. Dutt. London: Martin Lawrence. Cd-Rom version. London: Electric Book Co.
36.
GerberJohn. 1978. “The Formation of Pannekoek's Marxism.” Introduction to Bricianer, 1978.
37.
HardingNeil. 1991. “Plekhanov.” Pp. 424–6 in Bottomore, 1991.
38.
HookSidney. 1931. “Joseph Dietzgen.”P. 139 in Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences, V. London.
39.
HudisPeter. 1998. “Dialectics, ‘The Party’ and the Problem of the New Society.” Historical Materialism, 3, 95–117.
40.
HunleyJ. D.1991. The Life and Thought of Friedrich Engels: A Reinterpretation. New Haven, Connecticut and London: Yale University Press.
41.
JacobyRussell. 1981. Dialectic of Defeat: Contours of Western Marxism. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
42.
JordanZbigniew A.1967. The Evolution of Dialectical Materialism: A Philosophical and Sociological Analysis. New York: St. Martin's Press.
43.
KlineGeorge. 1988. “The Myth of Marx's Materialism.” In H. Dahin, ., eds., Philosophical Sovietology: The Pursuit of Science. Dordrecht: Reidel.
44.
LabriolaAntonio. 1906. Socialism and Philosophy. Tr. E. Untermann. Chicago: Charles Kerr.
45.
LeninVladimir I. 1961 (1913). “Twenty Fifth Anniversary of the Death of Joseph Dietzgen.” Pp. 79–82 in Collected Works, 19. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
46.
LeninVladimir I. 1972 (1908). Materialism and Empirio-Criticism: Critical Comments on a Reactionary Philosophy. Peking: Foreign Languages Press.
47.
LeninVladimir I. 1975 (1920). “Left-Wing” Communism, An Infantile Disorder. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
48.
LevineNorman. 1984. Dialogue Within the Dialectic. London: Allen and Unwin.
49.
MarxKarl. 1974 (1867). Capital: A Critical Analysis of Capitalist Production. Vol. I. Ed. Friedrich Engels, tr. Samuel Moore and Edward Aveling. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
50.
MarxKarl. 1977. Early Writings. Ed. Lucio Colletti. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
51.
MarxKarl and FriedrichEngels. 1956 (1845). The Holy Family: Or Critique of Critical Critique. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
52.
MaclntyreStuart. 1974. “Joseph Dietzgen and British Working Class Education.” Bulletin of the Study of Labour History, 29 (Fall), 50–4.
53.
MaclntyreStuart. 1986. A Proletarian Science: Marxism in Britain, 1917—1933. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
54.
MaclntyreStuart. 1991. “Joseph Dietzgen.” Pp. 152–3 in Bottomore, 1991.
McLellanDavid. 1979. Marxism After Marx. New York: Harper and Row.
57.
McLellanDavid. 1980. The Young Hegelians and Karl Marx. London: Macmillan.
58.
MehringFranz. 1966 (1918). Karl Marx: The Story of His Life. London: Allen and Unwin.
59.
MerquiorJosé G.1986. Western Marxism. London: Paladin Books.
60.
New Left Review, ed. 1977. Western Marxism: A Critical Reader. London: New Left Books.
61.
NovackGeorge. 1995. “In Defence of Engels.” Pp. 85–115 in George Novack. Polemics in Marxist Philosophy. New York: Pathfinder Books.
62.
PannekoekAnton. 1906. “The Position and Significance of Joseph Dietzgen's Philosophical Works.” Pp. 35–63 in Dietzgen, 1928.
63.
PannekoekAnton. 1975 (1938). Lenin as Philosopher: A Critical Examination of the Philosophical Basis of Leninism. London: Merlin Books.
64.
PlekhanovGeorg. 1976 (1907). “Joseph Dietzgen.” Pp. 100–16 in Selected Philosophical Works, III. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
65.
PlekhanovGeorg. 1977 (1891). “For the Sixtieth Anniversary of Hegel's Death.” Pp. 407–32 in Selected Philosophical Works, I. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
66.
RéeJonathan. 1984. Proletarian Philosophers: Problems in Socialist Culture in Britain, 1900-1940. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
67.
RéeJonathan. 1984. “Joseph Dietzgen and Proletarian Philosophy.”Pp. 23—45 in Rée, 1984.
68.
RéeJonathan. 1991. “Dialectical Materialism.” Pp. 81–2 in UrmsonJ. O. and RéeJ., eds., The Concise Encyclopedia of Western Philosophy and Philosophers. London and New York: Routledge.
69.
RockmoreTom. 1999. “Engels, Lukacs and Kant's Thing-in-Itself.” Pp. 145–61 in StegerM. and CarverT., eds., Engels After Marx. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press.
70.
SheehanHelena. 1993. Marxism and the Philosophy of Science: A Critical History. Atlantic Highlands, New Jersey: Humanities Press.
71.
TuckerRobert. 1972. Philosophy and Myth in Karl Marx. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
72.
UntermannErnst. 1906. “Antonio Labriola and Joseph Dietzgen: A Comparison of Historical Materialism and Monist Materialism.” In Labriola, 1906.
