Automation has long been a significant component of the flight deck, to the point that it is often referred to as a “team member.” This review notes the recent insights into aviation human-automation interaction, starting with a quick tour of the modern flight deck to illustrate the current state of the art in applying automation in safety-critical systems. The review then contrasts three prevalent perspectives on applying automation: those that focus on the technology itself, on automation within the operating environment, and on automation as a team member. Next, this review discusses two prevalent forms of aviation automation for which significant research and design guidance has been developed: automation based on modal behaviors, such as the flight management system, and alerting functions, which direct attention or motivate action as warranted by events. Finally, the review notes considerations regarding the certification, testing, and evaluation of automation (and human-automation interaction) in the safety-critical domain of aviation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbeloosA. L. M.van PaassenM. M.MulderM.PritchettA. R.MulderJ. A. (2003). Towards an ecological interface design for the presentation of spatio-temporal affordances in airspace. In Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology. Dayton, OH: Wright State University.
2.
BainbridgeL. (1983). Ironies of automation. Automatica, 19, 775–779.
3.
BassE. J.PritchettA. R. (2008). Human-automated judgment learning: A methodology to investigate human interaction with automated judges. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 38, 759–776.
4.
BilimoriaK. D. (1998). A methodology for the performance evaluation of a conflict probe. In Proceedings of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference (AIAA 98–4238). Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
5.
BillingsC. E. (1997). Aviation automation: The search for a human-centered approach. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
6.
BisantzA. M.PritchettA. R. (2003). Measuring the fit between human judgments and automated alerting algorithms: A study of collision detection. Human Factors, 45, 266–280.
7.
BjörklundC. M.AlfredsonJ.DekkerS. W. A. (2006). Mode monitoring and call-outs: An eye-tracking study of two-crew automated flight deck operations. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 16, 263–275.
8.
BoveT.AndersenH. B. (1999). The effect of an advisory system on pilots' go/no-go decision during takeoff. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 75(2), 179–191.
9.
Cannon-BowersJ. A.SalasE.BlickensderferE.BowersC. A. (1998). The impact of cross-training and workload on team functioning: A replication and extension of initial findings. Human Factors, 40, 92–101.
10.
Cannon-BowersJ. A.SalasE.ConverseS. (1993). Shared mental models in expert team decision making. In CastellanN. J.Jr (Ed.), Current issues in individual and group decision making (pp. 221–246). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
11.
ChappellA. R.CrowtherE. G.MitchellC. M.GovindarajT. (1997). The VNAV tutor: Addressing a mode awareness difficulty for pilots of glass cockpit aircraft. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics—Part A: Systems and Humans, 27, 372–385.
12.
ChenT. L.PritchettA. R. (2001). Cockpit decision aids for emergency flight planning. Journal of Aircraft, 38, 935–943.
13.
CookeN. J.SalasE.Cannon-BowersJ. A.StoutR. J. (2000). Measuring team knowledge. Human Factors, 42, 151–173.
14.
CooperG. E. (1977). A survey of the status and philosophies relating to cockpit warning systems (NASA Contractor Rep. CR-152071). Moffett Field, CA: NASA Ames Research Center.
15.
CourteneyH. (1999). Human factors of automation: The regulator's challenge. In DekkerS.HollnagelE. (Eds.), Coping with computers in the cockpit (pp. 109–130). Brookfield, VT: Ashgate.
16.
CroftJ. (2001, July 16). Despite human frailties, pilots will remain on scene. Aviation Week and Space Technology, p. 82.
17.
CrowJ.JavauxD.RushbyJ. (2000). Models and mechanized methods that integrate human factors into automation design In Proceedings of HCI-Aero 2000: International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction in Aeronautics (pp. 163–168). Available at http://www.csl.sri.com/papers/hci-aero00/hci-aero00.pdf.
18.
DavisS. D.PritchettA. R. (1999). Alerting system assertiveness, knowledge, and over-reliance. Journal of Information Technology Impact, 3, 119–143.
19.
DeganiA.HeymannM. (2002). Formal verification of human-automation interaction. Human Factors, 44, 28–43.
20.
DeganiA.ShaftoM.KirlikA. (1999). Modes in human-machine systems: Constructs, representation, and classification. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 9, 125–138.
21.
DekkerS. W. A.WoodsD. D. (2002). MABA-MABA or abracadabra? Progress on human–automation coordination. Cognition, Technology and Work, 4, 240–244.
22.
DismukesK.NowinskiJ. (2007). Prospective memory, concurrent task management, and pilot error. In KramerA.WiegmannD.KirlikA. (Eds.), Attention: From theory to practice (pp. 225–236). New York: Oxford University Press.
23.
DoneyP. M.CannonJ. P.MullenM. R. (1998). Understanding the influence of national culture on the development of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23, 601–620.
24.
EndsleyM. R. (1995a). Measurement of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors, 37, 65–84.
25.
EndsleyM. R. (1995b). Toward a theory of situation awareness. Human Factors, 37, 32–64.
26.
EntinE. E.EntinE. B. (2001). Measures for evaluation of team process and performance in experiments and exercises. In Proceedings of the 6th International Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium. Available at http://www.aptima.com/professional_staff.php?id=19.
27.
EntinE. E.SerfatyD. (1999). Adaptive team coordination. Human Factors, 41, 321–325.
28.
FaitakisY. E.ThapliyalS.KantorJ. C. (1998). An LMI approach to the evaluation of alarm thresholds. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 8, 659–667.
29.
FearyM.SherryL.PalmerE.PolsonP. (2000). Evaluation of a formal methodology for developing aircraft vertical flight guidance training material. In Proceedings of HCI-Aero 2000: International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction in Aeronautics (pp. 123–129). Available at http://humanfactors.arc.nasa.gov/IHpersonnel/feary/files/HCIAero2000_feary.pdf?.
30.
FeighK. M.PritchettA. R.DenqT. W.JackoJ. A. (2007). Describing decision making during an airline rescheduling task using the contextual control model. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 1, 169–185.
31.
FittsP. M. (Ed.) (1951). Human engineering for an effective air navigation and traffic control system. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
32.
GelbA. (1974). Applied optimal estimation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33.
GibsonC.ZellmerM. (1997, October). Intercultural analysis of the meaning of teamwork: Evidence from six multinational corporations. Presented at the Academy of International Business Conference, Monterrey, Mexico.
34.
GreenD. M.SwetsJ. A. (1989). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley.
35.
GuerlainS. A.JamiesonG. A.BullemerP.BlairR. (2002). The MPC elucidator: A case study in the design for human-automation interaction. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 32, 25–40.
36.
GuerlainS. A.SmithP. J.ObradovichJ. H.RudmannS.StrohmP.SmithJ. W., et al. (1999). Interactive critiquing as a form of decision support: An empirical evaluation. Human Factors, 41, 72–89.
37.
GuerlainS. A.SmithP. J.ObradovichJ. H.SmithJ. W.RudmannS.StrohmP. (1995). The Antibody Identification Assistant (AIDA): An example of a cooperative computer support system. In Proceedings of the 1995 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (pp. 1909–1914). New York: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
38.
HartS. G.HauserJ. R.LesterP. T. (1984). Inflight evaluation of four measures of pilot workload. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 28th Annual Meeting (pp. 945–949). Santa Monica, CA: SAGE Publications.
39.
HasseD. (1992). ALPA ground proximity warning system survey. In Proceedings of the Flight Safety Foundation 45th Annual International Air Safety Seminar (p. 38–44). Arlington, VA: Flight Safety Foundation.
40.
HelmreichR. L.MerrittA. C.WilhelmJ. A. (1999). The evolution of crew resource management training in commercial aviation. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 9, 19–32.
41.
HilburnB.MolloyR.WongR.ParasuramanR. (1993). Operator versus computer control of adaptive automation. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (pp. 161–166). Columbus: Ohio State University.
42.
HollnagelE. (1993). Human reliability analysis: Context and control. London: Academic Press.
43.
HollnagelE. (2002). Time and time again. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 3, 143–158.
44.
HutchinsE. L. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
45.
JavauxD. (2002). A method for predicting errors when interacting with finite state systems: How implicit learning shapes the user's knowledge of a system. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 75, 147–165.
46.
JavauxD.OlivierE. (2000). Assessing and understanding pilots' knowledge of mode transitions on the A340–200/300. In Proceedings of HCI-Aero 2000: International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction in Aeronautics (pp. 81–86). Available at http://www.csl.sri.com/papers/hci-aero00/hci-aero00.doc.
47.
JohnsonE. N. (2000). Limited authority adaptive flight control. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA. Retrieved March 22, 2009, from http://www.ae.gatech.edu/people/ejohnson/Thesis-repro.pdf.
48.
JohnsonE. N.PritchettA. R. (1995). Experimental study of vertical flight path mode awareness (ASL-95–3). Cambridge, MA: International Center for Air Transportation. Available at http://web.mit.edu/aeroastro/labs/icat/research.shtml.
49.
KaberD. B.EndsleyM. (2004). The effects of level of automation and adaptive automation on human performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 5, 113–153.
50.
KaberD. B.RileyJ. M.TanK.-W.EndsleyM. R. (2001). On the design of adaptive automation for complex systems. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, 5, 37–57.
51.
KaberD. B.WrightM. C.PrinzelL. J.ClamannM. P. (2005). Adaptive automation of human-machine system information-processing functions. Human Factors, 47, 730–741.
52.
KerstholtJ. H. (1996). The effect of information costs on strategy selection in dynamic tasks. Acta Psychologica, 94, 273–290.
53.
KirlikA. (1993). Modeling strategic behavior in human-automation interaction: Why an “aid” can (and should) go unused. Human Factors, 35, 221–242.
54.
KirlikA. (1995). Requirements for psychological models to support design: Towards ecological task analysis. In FlachJ. M.HancockP. A.CairdJ. K.VicenteK. J. (Eds.), Global perspectives on the ecology of human-machine systems (pp. 68–120). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
55.
KucharJ. K. (1996). Methodology for alerting-system performance evaluation. Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 19, 438–444.
56.
KupfererR. (1999). Rotorcraft pilot's associate from concept to flight demonstration. In Proceedings of the 55th AHS Vertical Flight Society Annual Forum (pp. 1303–1311). Alexandria, VA: American Helicopter Society.
57.
LatorellaK. A. (1996). Investigating interruptions: An example from the flight deck. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 40th Annual Meeting (pp. 249–253). Santa Monica, CA: SAGE Publications.
58.
LaugheryK. R.WogalterM. S. (2006). Designing effective warnings, In WilligesR. C. (Ed.), Reviews of human factors and ergonomics (Vol. 2, pp. 241–271). Santa Monica, CA: SAGE Publications.
59.
LaytonC.SmithP. J.McCoyE. (1994). Design of a cooperative problem-solving system for en route flight planning: An empirical evaluation. Human Factors, 36, 131–142.
60.
LeeJ. D.MorayN. (1994). Trust, self-confidence and operators' adaptation to automation. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 40, 153–184.
61.
LeeJ. D.SeeK. A. (2004). Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human Factors, 46, 50–80.
62.
MÅrtenssonL. (1995). The aircraft crash at Gottröra: Experiences of the cockpit crew. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 5, 305–326.
63.
MasalonisA. J.ParasuramanR. (1999). Trust as a construct for evaluation of automated aids: Past and future theory and research. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 43rd Annual Meeting (pp. 184–188). Santa Monica, CA: SAGE Publications.
64.
MauleJ. A. (1997). Strategies for adapting to time pressure. In FlinR.SalasE.StrubM.MartinL. (Eds.), Decision making under stress (pp. 271–280). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
65.
McGuirlJ. M.SarterN. B. (2003). Supporting trust calibration in automated decision aids through the presentation of dynamic reliability information. In Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology. Dayton, OH: Wright State University.
MeredithC.EdworthyJ. (1994). Sources of confusion in intensive therapy unit alarms. In StantonN. (Ed.), Human factors in alarm design (pp. 207–219). London: Taylor & Francis.
68.
MillerC. A.ParasuramanR. (2007). Designing for flexible interaction between humans and automation: Delegation interfaces for supervisory control. Human Factors, 49, 57–75.
69.
MolloyR.ParasuramanR. (1996). Monitoring an automated system for a single failure: Vigilance and task complexity effects. Human Factors, 38, 311–322.
70.
MosierK. L.SkitkaL. J. (1996). Human decision makers and automated decision aids: Made for each other? In ParasuramanR.MoulouaM. (Eds.), Automation and human performance: Theory and applications (pp. 201–220). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
71.
MuirB. M. (1987). Trust between humans and machines, and the design of decision aids. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 27, 527–539.
72.
MuirB. M. (1994). Trust in automation: Part I. Theoretical issues in the study of trust and human intervention in automated systems. Ergonomics, 37, 1905–1922.
73.
NaikarN.PearceB.DrummD.SandersonP. M. (2003). Designing teams for first-of-a-kind, complex systems using the initial phases of cognitive work analysis: Case study. Human Factors, 45, 202–217.
74.
NoyesJ. M.StarrA. F. (2000). Civil aircraft warning systems: Future directions in information management and presentation. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 10, 169–188.
75.
OlsonW. A.SarterN. B. (2000). Automation management strategies: Pilot preferences and operational experiences. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 10, 327–341.
76.
OrasanuJ. (1993). Decision making in the cockpit. In WienerE. L.KankiB. G.HelmreichR. L. (Eds.), Cockpit resource management (pp. 137–172). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
77.
OrasanuJ. (1997). Stress and naturalistic decision making: Strengthening the weak links. In FlinR.SalasE.StrubM.MartinL. (Eds.), Decision making under stress (pp. 43–66). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
78.
PalmerM. T.RogersW. H.PressH. N.LatorellaK. A.AbbottT. S. (1995). A crew-centered flight deck design philosophy for high-speed civil transport (HSCT) aircraft (NASA TM-109171). Hampton, VA: NASA Langley Research Center.
79.
ParasuramanR.RileyV. (1997). Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human Factors, 39, 230–253.
80.
PittJ. (2004). Digital blush: Towards shame and embarrassment in multi-agent information trading applications. Cognition, Technology and Work, 6, 23–36.
81.
PritchettA. R. (2005). Reviewing the roles of cockpit alerting systems. In HarrisD.MuirH. C. (Eds.), Contemporary issues in human factors and aviation safety (pp. 47–80). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
82.
PritchettA. R.BarhydtR.HansmanR. J.JohnsonE. N. (1996). Flight simulator testing of cockpit traffic displays using robust situation generation. In Proceedings of the AIAA Flight Simulation Technologies Conference (AIAA-96–3554). Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
83.
PritchettA. R.VándorB. (2001). Designing situation displays to promote conformance to automatic alerts. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 45th Annual Meeting (pp. 311–315). Santa Monica, CA: SAGE Publications.
84.
PritchettA. R.VándorB.EdwardsK. E. (2002). Testing and implementing cockpit alerting systems. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 75, 193–206.
85.
ProctorP. (1998, April 6). Integrated cockpit safety system certified. Aviation Week and Space Technology, p. 61.
86.
RasmussenJ.PejtersenA.GoodsteinL. (1994). Cognitive systems engineering. New York: Wiley.
87.
RileyV. (1996). Operator reliance on automation: Theory and data. In ParasuramanR.MoulouaM. (Eds.), Automation and human performance: Theory and applications (pp. 19–35). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
88.
RileyV.DeMersB.MisiakC.SchmalzB. (1998). The cockpit control language: A pilot-centered avionics interface. In Proceedings of HCI-Aero: The International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction in Aerospace. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
89.
RouseW. B.Cannon-BowersJ. A.SalasE. (1992). The role of mental models in team performance in complex systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 22, 1296–1308.
90.
RTCA, Inc. (1999). Final report of the RTCA Task Force 4: Certification. Washington, DC: Author.
91.
RushbyJ. (2002). Using model checking to help discover mode confusions and other automation surprises. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 75, 167–177.
92.
SalasE.WilsonK. A.BurkeC. S.WightmanD. C.HowseW. R. (2006). Crew resource management training research, practice, and lessons learned. In WilligesR. C. (Ed.), Reviews of human factors and ergonomics (Vol. 2, pp. 35–73). Santa Monica, CA: SAGE Publications.
93.
SarterN. B.MumawR. J.WickensC. D. (2007). Pilots' monitoring strategies and performance on automated flight decks: An empirical study combining behavioral and eye-tracking data. Human Factors, 49, 347–357.
94.
SarterN. B.WoodsD. D. (1992). Pilot interaction with cockpit automation: Operational experiences with the flight management system. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 2, 303–321.
95.
SarterN. B.WoodsD. D. (1994). Pilot interaction with cockpit automation: II. An experimental study of pilots' model and awareness of the flight management system. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 4, 1–28.
96.
SarterN. B.WoodsD. D. (2000). Team play with a powerful and independent agent: A full-mission simulation study. Human Factors, 42, 390–402.
97.
ScerboM. (1996). Theoretical perspectives on adaptive automation. In ParasuramanR.MoulouaM. (Eds.), Automation and human performance: Theory and applications (pp. 37–63). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
98.
SchutteP. C.GoodrichK. H.CoxD. E.JacksonE. B.PalmerM. T.PopeA. T., et al. (2007). The naturalistic flight deck system: An integrated system concept for improved single-pilot operations (NASA TM-2007–215090). Hampton, VA: NASA Langley Research Center.
99.
ScottR.RothE. M.DeutschS. E.MalchiodiE.KazmierczakT. E.EgglestonR. G., et al. (2005). Work-centered support systems: A human-centered approach to intelligent system design. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 20, 73–81.
100.
SeagullF. J.SandersonP. M. (2001). Anesthesia alarms in context: An observational study. Human Factors, 43, 66–78.
101.
SeamsterT. (1999). Automation and advanced crew resource management. In DekkerS.HollnagelE. (Eds.), Coping with computers in the cockpit (pp. 195–213). Brookfield, VT: Ashgate.
102.
SheridanT. B. (1992). Telerobotics, automation and human supervisory control. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
103.
SheridanT. B.ParasuramanR. (2006). Human-automation interaction. In NickersonR. S. (Ed.), Reviews of human factors and ergonomics (Vol. 1, pp. 89–129). Santa Monica, CA: SAGE Publications.
104.
SherryL.PolsonP. G. (1999). Shared models of flight management system vertical guidance. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 9, 139–153.
105.
SherryL.PolsonP. G.FearyM.PalmerE. (1997). Analysis of the behavior of a modern autopilot (Tech. Rep. C69–5370–009). Minneapolis, MN: Honeywell.
106.
SingerG. (1999). Filling the gaps in the human factors certification net. In DekkerS.HollnagelE. (Eds.), Coping with computers in the cockpit (pp. 87–107). Brookfield, VT: Ashgate.
107.
SklarA. E.SarterN. B. (1999). Good vibrations: Tactile feedback in support of attention allocation and human-automation coordination in event-driven domains. Human Factors, 41, 543–552.
108.
Society of Aerospace Engineers. (1988). Flight deck alerting system, Aerospace Recommended Practice 4102/4. Warrendale, PA: Author.
109.
SorkinR. D.KantowitzB. H.KantowitzS. C. (1988). Likelihood alarm displays. Human Factors, 30, 445–459.
110.
SorkinR. D.WoodsD. D. (1985). Systems with human monitors: A signal detection analysis. Human-Computer Interaction, 1, 49–75.
StantonN. A.AshleighM. J.RobertsA. D.XuF. (2001). Testing Hollnagel's contextual control model: Assessing team behavior in a human supervisory control task. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, 5, 111–123.
113.
StantonN. A.EdworthyJ. (Eds.) (1999). Human factors in auditory warnings. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
114.
StasserG.DavisJ. J. (1981). Group decision-making and social influence: A social interaction model. Psychological Review, 88, 523–551.
115.
StoutR. J.Cannon-BowersJ. A.SalasE.MilanovichD. M. (1999). Planning, shared mental models, and coordinated performance: An empirical link is established. Human Factors, 41, 61–71.
116.
SvensonO.EdlandA. (1993). On judgment and decision making under time pressure and the control of process industries. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (pp. 367–375). New York: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
117.
ToddP. A.BenbasatI. (1994). The influence of decision aids on choice strategies under conditions of high cognitive load. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 24, 537–547.
118.
TomaykoJ. K. (1991). The airplane as computer peripheral. American Heritage of Invention & Technology, 7(3), 19–24.
119.
TrujilloA. C. (1999). Changes in pilot behavior with predictive system status information. In Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (pp. 6–11). Columbus: Ohio State University.
120.
VakilS. S.HansmanR. J. (2000). Analysis of complexity evolution management and human performance issues in commercial aircraft automation systems (ICAT-2000–3). Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, International Center for Air Transportation.
121.
VakilS. S.HansmanR. J. (2002). Approaches to mitigating complexity-driven issues in commercial autoflight systems. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 75, 133–145.
122.
VeitengruberJ. E. (1977). Design criteria for aircraft warning, caution, and advisory alerting systems. Journal of Aircraft, 15, 574–581.
123.
VicenteK. (1999). Cognitive work analysis: Towards safe, productive and healthy computer-based work. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
124.
VicenteK.RasmussenJ. (1990). The ecology of human-machine systems: II. Mediating “direct perception” in complex work domains. Ecological Psychology, 2, 207–249.
125.
WickensC. D.GemplerK. S.MorphewE. M. (2000). Workload and reliability of predictor displays in aircraft traffic avoidance. Transportation Human Factors, 2, 99–126.
126.
WienerE. L.CurryR. E. (1980). Flight-deck automation: Promises and problems. Ergonomics, 23, 995–1011.
127.
WoodsD. D. (1991). The cognitive engineering of problem representation. In WeirG. R. S.AltyJ. L. (Eds.), Human-computer interaction in complex systems (pp. 169–188). New York: Academic Press.
128.
WoodsD. D. (1995). The alarm problem and directed attention in dynamic fault management. Ergonomics, 38, 2371–2393.
129.
WoodsD. D. (1996). Decomposing automation: Apparent simplicity, real complexity. In ParasuramanR.MoulouaM. (Eds.), Automation and human performance: Theory and applications (pp. 1–16). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
130.
WoodsD. D.HollnagelE. (2006). Joint cognitive systems: Patterns in cognitive systems engineering. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
