Determining how the controller (or air navigation service provider) of the future will function in tomorrow's Next Generation Air Transportation System (NextGen) will require an understanding of the existing literature. In this chapter, after an analysis of the controller's job, we focus on technology, which is an important factor in air traffic control (ATC) today and will become increasingly so in NextGen. We then turn to workload and the extent to which it can be predicted. From human-technology interaction and workload, we move to the multiple facets of cognition thought to underlie these and other aspects of the controller's job. Beyond individual cognition, we review collaboration among controllers and discuss both synchronous cooperation and the cooperative shift change. As we move up the system, we look at error, risk, and safety. Finally, we consider the work on controller selection, covering both “select-in” (KSAOs) and “select-out” (e.g., medical and suitability) factors. For NextGen to be successful, human factors researchers must determine from today's research how the human operator can best function to provide ATC services in the future.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbedM.TabaryD.KolskiC. (2004). Using formal specification techniques for the modeling of tasks and the generation of human-computer user interface specifications. In DiaperD.StantonN. A. (Eds.), The handbook of task analysis for human-computer interaction (pp. 503–529). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
2.
AhlstromU. (2003). An initial survey of National Airspace System auditory alarm issues in terminal air traffic control (DOT/FAA/CT-TN03/10). Atlantic City, NJ: William J. Hughes Technical Center.
3.
AhlstromU. (2005). Work domain analysis for air traffic controller weather displays. Journal of Safety Research, 36, 159–169.
4.
AhlstromU.Friedman-BergF. (2006). TRACON controller weather information needs: III. Human-in-the-loop simulation (DOT/FAA/CT-05/12). Atlantic City, NJ: William J. Hughes Technical Center.
5.
AhlstromU.KudrickB. (2007). Human factors criteria for displays: A human factors design standard update of chapter 5 (DOT/FAA/TC-07/11). Atlantic City, NJ: William J. Hughes Technical Center.
6.
AhlstromU.LongoK. (2003). Human factors design standard (HF-STD-001). Atlantic City, NJ: William J. Hughes Technical Center. Retrieved August 18, 2008, from http://hf.tc.faa.gov/hfds.
7.
AligneF.GrimaudI.HoffmanE.RogninL.ZeghalK. (2003, December). COSPACE 2002 controller experiment assessing the impact of spacing instructions in E-TMA and TMA (EEC Report No. 386). Brétigny-sur-Orge, France: EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre.
8.
AllendoerferK.WillemsB.ZingaleC.PaiS. (2006, May). Methods for examining possible effects of en route automation modernization (ERAM) on controller performance (DOT/FAA/CT-TN06/14). Atlantic City, NJ: William J. Hughes Technical Center.
9.
AllendoerferK.YuditskyT.MogfordR. H.GalushkaJ. J. (2005). The development of effective STARS user interfaces. In KirwanB.RodgersM.SchaferD. (Eds.), Human factors impacts in air traffic management (pp. 421–454). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
10.
AllendoerferK.ZingaleC.PaiS.WillemsB. (2006). En route air traffic controller commands: Frequency of use during routine operations (DOT/FAA/TC-TN06/4). Atlantic City, NJ: William J. Hughes Technical Center.
11.
AmmermanH. L.BeckerE. S.JonesG. W.TobeyW. K.PhillipsM. D. (1987). FAA air traffic control concepts: Vol. I. ATC background and analysis methodology (FAA Report No. DOT/FAA/AP-87–01, Vol. 1). Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration.
12.
AradB. A. (1964). The controller load and sector design. Journal of Air Traffic Control, 12–31.
13.
AthènesS.AvertyP.PuechmorelS.DelahayeD.ColletC. (2002). Complexity and controller workload: Trying to bridge the gap. In Proceedings of the 2002 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction in Aeronautics (pp. 56–60). Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
14.
AvertyP.ColletC.DittmarA.Vernet-MauryE.AthenesS. (2004). Mental workload in air traffic control: An Index constructed from field tests. Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine, 75, 333–341.
15.
BaileyL. L.WillemsB. F. (2002). The moderator effects of taskload on the interplay between en route intrasector team communications, situation awareness, and mental workload (DOT/FAA/AM-02–18). Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration.
16.
BaileyL. L.WillemsB. F.PetersonL. M. (2001). The effects of workload and decision support automation on en route R-side and D-side communication exchanges (DOT/FAA/AM-01/20). Washington, DC: Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, Office of Aerospace Medicine.
17.
BallC. G.ConnolyK. A.RhodesL. S. (2003, September). Plan for defining flow constrained areas from automatically-generated weather products on the traffic situation display (MP 03W0000164). McLean, VA: MITRE Center for Advanced Aviation System Development.
18.
BallC. G.FellmanL.TaberN. J.WankeC. R.YeeM. (2003, July). A concept of use for an initial integrated impact assessment capability (MP 01W0000139R1). McLean, VA: MITRE Center for Advanced Aviation System Development.
19.
BisseretA. (1971). Analysis of mental processes involved in air traffic control. Ergonomics, 14, 565–570.
20.
BlomH. A. P.StroeveS. H.EverdijM. H. C.van der ParkM. N. J. (2003). Human cognition performance model to evaluate safe spacing in air traffic. Human Factors and Aerospace Safety, 3, 59–82.
21.
BoagC.NealA.LoftS.HalfordG. S. (2006). An analysis of relational complexity in an air traffic control conflict detection task. Ergonomics, 49, 1508–1526.
22.
BorumR.SuperJ.RandM. (2003). Forensic assessment for high-risk occupations. In GoldsteinA. M.WeinerI. B. (Eds.), Handbook of psychology. Volume 11: Forensic psychology (pp. 133–147). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
23.
BotellaJ.ContrerasM. J.ShihP. C.RuibioV. (2001). Two short tests fail to detect vigilance decrements. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 17, 48–55.
24.
BoudesN.CellierJ. M. (2000). Accuracy of estimations made by air traffic controllers. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 10, 207–225.
25.
BoveT.AndersonH. B. (2003). Validation of an error management taxonomy in ATC. International Journal of Applied Aviation Studies, 3, 39–60.
26.
BreitlerA. L.LeskoM.KirkM. (1996). Effects of sector complexity and controller experience on probability of operational errors in air route traffic (DTFA01–95-C-00002). Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration.
27.
BroachD. (2002). Air traffic controller ability requirements in the U.S. National Airspace System. In EièfeltH.HeilM. C.BroachD. (Eds.), Staffing the ATM system: The selection of air traffic controllers (pp. 3–12). Aldershot, UKAshgate.
28.
BroachD. (2005). A singular success: Air traffic control specialist selection 1981–1992. In KirwanB.RodgersM.SchaferD. (Eds.), Human factors impacts in air traffic management (pp. 177–205). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
29.
BroachD.DollarC. S. (2002). Relationship of employee attitudes and supervisor–controller ratio to en route operational error rates (DOT/FAA/AM-02/9). Oklahoma City, OK: Civil Aeromedical Institute.
30.
BroachD.SchroederD. J. (2005). Relationship of air traffic control specialist age to en route operational errors (DOT/FAA/AM-05/22). Washington, DC: FAA Office of Aerospace Medicine.
31.
BroachD.SchroederD. J. (2006). Relationship of air traffic control specialist age and en route operational errors. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 16(4), 363–373.
32.
BrookerP. (2003). Controller workload, airspace capacity and future systems. Human Factors, 3, 1–23.
33.
BrookerP. (2005). Air traffic management accident risk, part 1: The limits of realistic modeling. Safety Science, 44, 419–450.
34.
BrookerP. (2007). Are there good air traffic management safety indicators for very safe systems? Journal of Navigation, 60, 45–67.
35.
BuckS.BiemansM. C. M.HilburnB. G.van WoerkomP. Th. L. M. (1996). Synthesis of functions (NLR Report TR 97054 L). Amsterdam: National Aerospace Laboratory NLR.
36.
BuckleyE. P.DeBarysheB. D.HitchnerN.KohnP. (1983). Methods and measurements in real time air traffic control system simulation (DOT/FAA/CT-TN83/26). Atlantic City NJ: Department of Transportation/Federal Aviation Administration Technical Center.
37.
CardosiK. (2002). Operational errors in air traffic control towers. Air Traffic Control Quarterly, 10, 147–163.
38.
CardosiK. (2003, January). Human factors integration challenges in the Terminal Radar Approach Control (TRACON) environment (DOT/FAA/AR-02/127, DOT-VNTSC-FAA-02–11). Cambridge, MA: Volpe National Transportation Systems Center.
39.
CardosiK. (2004). Human factors integration challenges in the Air Route Traffic Control Center (ARTCC) environment (DOT/FAA/AR-04/18). Washington, DC: FAA Office of Aviation Research.
40.
CardosiK. (2005). Runway safety. In KirwanB.RodgersM.SchaferD. (Eds.), Human factors impacts in air traffic management. Hampshire, UK: Ashgate.
41.
CardosiK.DiFioreA. (2004). Metrics of communication performance. Air Traffic Control Quarterly, 12, 297–313.
42.
CardosiK.YostA. (2001). Controller and pilot error in airport operations: A review of previous research and analysis of safety data (DOT-VNTSC-FAA-00–21). Cambridge, MA: John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center.
43.
CasaliJ. G.WierwilleW. W. (1983). A comparison of rating scale, secondary-task, physiological, and primary-task workload estimation techniques in a simulated flight task emphasizing communications load. Human Factors, 25, 623–641.
44.
ChaboudT.HunterR.HustacheJ. C.MahlichS.TullettP. (2000). Investigating the air traffic complexity: Potential impacts on workload and costs. Brussels, Belgium: Eurocontrol, NATS.
45.
ChatterjiG. B.ShridharB. (1997). Measures of airspace complexity and preliminary draft. Unpublished manuscript, NASA Ames Research Center.
46.
ChatterjiG. B.SridharB. (2001). Measures for air traffic controller workload prediction. Paper presented at the First AIAA Aircraft Technology, Integration and Operations Forum. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
47.
ChristienR.BenkouarA.ChaboudT.LoubieresP. (2002). Air traffic complexity indicators and ATC sectors classification. Proceedings of the 21st Digital Avionics Systems Conference, 1, 2D3–1–2D3–7.
48.
ChristienR.BenkouarA.ChaboudT.LoubieresP. (2003, June). Air traffic complexity indicators & ATC sectors classified. Paper presented at ATM 2003, Budapest, Hungary.
49.
CoanH. (2002). Risk, error and blame in organizations: A communication approach. Corporate Communications, 7, 232–240.
50.
CocanowerA. B. (2002). Terminal airspace metrics. Journal of Air Traffic Control, 44(1), 25–28.
51.
ColomR.ContrerasM. J.ShihP. C.SantacreuJ. (2003). The assessment of spatial ability with a single computerized test. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 19, 92–100.
52.
ConroyP. (2003, May). DOVE 1 Fast-time simulation (EEC Report No. 381). Brétigny-sur-Orge, France: EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre.
ContrerasM. J.ColomR.HernandezJ. M.SantacreuJ. (2003). Is static spatial performance distinguishable from dynamic spatial performance? A latent-variable analysis. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 10, 207–225.
55.
CookeN. J.DursoF. T. (2007). Stories of human-technology failures and cognitive engineering successes. London: Taylor & Francis.
56.
CorkerK. (2003). A cognitive framework for operation of advanced aerospace technologies. In HollnagelE. (Ed.), Handbook of cognitive task design (pp. 417–446). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
57.
CorkerK. M.GoreB. F.FlemingK.LaneJ. (2000). Free flight and the context of control: Experiments and modeling to determine the impact of distributed air-ground air traffic management on safety and procedures. In Proceedings of the 3rd USA/Europe Air Traffic Management R & D Seminar. Naples, Italy: USA/Europe ATM. Retrieved August 18, 2008 from http://atm2001.eurocontrol.fr/3rd-usa-europe-atm-r-d-seminar/paper_082.
58.
CorkerK.HowardH.MooijM. (2005, November). Adaptation and adoption of technologies: Examination of the User Request Evaluation Tool (URET) 1 (HAIL Report 2005–2442–01). San Jose, CA: San Jose State University.
59.
CrutchfieldJ.RosenbergC. (2007). Predictive subjective workload ratings: A comparison and synthesis of operational and theoretical models (DOT/FAA/AM-07/6). Oklahoma City, OK: Civil Aeromedical Institute.
60.
CruzC.BoquetA.DetwilerC.NesthusT. (2003). Clockwise and counterclockwise rotating shifts: Effects on vigilance and performance. Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine, 74, 606–614.
61.
CruzC.Della RoccoP. S.HackworthC. (2000). Effects of quick rotating shift schedules on health and adjustment of air traffic controllers. Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine, 71, 400–407.
62.
CruzC.DetwilerC.NesthusT.BoquetA. (2002, May). A laboratory comparison of clockwise and counterclockwise rapidly rotating shift schedules: Part I. Sleep (DOT/FAA/AM-02/8). Oklahoma City, OK: Civil Aero-medical Institute..
63.
CummingsM. L.GuerlainS. (2007). Developing operator capacity estimates for supervisory control of autonomous vehicles. Human Factors, 49, 1–15.
64.
D'ArcyJ.Della RoccoP. (2001). Air traffic control specialist decision making and strategic planning: A field survey (DOT/FAA/CT-TN01/05). Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration.
65.
DattelA. R.KingR. E. (2006). Reweighting AT-SAT to mitigate group score differences (DOT/FAA/AM-6/16). Washington, DC: FAA Office of Aerospace Medicine.
66.
DavisC. G.DanaherJ. W.FischlM. A. (1963). The influence of selected sector characteristics upon ARTCC controller activities (Contract No. FAA/BRD-301). Arlington, VA: The Matrix Corporation.
67.
Davison ReynoldsH. (2006, February). Modeling the air traffic controller's cognitive projection process (Report No. ICAT-2006–1). Cambridge, MA: MIT International Center for Air Transportation.
68.
DeanM. A.RussellC. J.FarmerW. L. (2002). Non-cognitive predictors of air traffic controller performance. In EièfeltH.HeilM. C.BroachD. (Eds.), Staffing the ATM system: The selection of air traffic controllers (pp. 59–72). Aldershot, UKAshgate.
69.
DekkerS.WoodsD. D. (1999). To intervene or not to intervene: The dilemma of management by exception. Cognition, Technology & Work, 1, 86–96.
70.
DekkerS. W. A.NyceJ. M. (2004). How can ergonomics influence design? Moving from research findings to future systems. Ergonomics, 47, 1624–1639.
71.
Della RoccoP. S.ComperatoreC.CaldwellL.CruzC. (2000, February). The effects of napping on night shift performance (DOT/FAA/AM-00/10). Oklahoma City, OK: Civil Aeromedical Institute.
72.
Della RoccoP. S.NesthusT. E. (2005). Shift work and air traffic control: Transitioning research results to the workforce. In KirwanB.RodgersM. D.SchaeferK. (Eds.), Human factors impacts in air traffic management (pp. 243–281). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
73.
Della RoccoP. S.PanjwaniG.Friedman-BergF.KopardekarP.HahS. (2004, November). Collocation of user request evaluation tool, traffic management advisor, and controller pilot data link communications: An initial human factors evaluation (DOT/FAA/CT-TN04/06). Atlantic City, NJ: William J. Hughes Technical Center.
74.
DeMatosP. A. L.PowellP. L. (2003). Decision support for flight re-routing in Europe. Decision Support Systems, 34, 397–412.
75.
DiaperD. (2004). Understanding task analysis for human-computer interaction. In DiaperD.StantonN. A. (Eds.), The handbook of task analysis for human-computer interaction (pp. 5–47). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
76.
DiMeoK.SollenbergerR.KopardekarP.LozitoS.MackintoshM.-A.CardosiK., et al. (2002, January). Air-ground integration experiment (DOT/FAA/CT-TN02/06). Atlantic City, NJ: William J. Hughes Technical Center.
77.
DiNoceraF.FabriziR.TerenziM.FerlazzoF. (2006). Procedural errors in air traffic control: Effects of traffic density, expertise, and automation. Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine, 77, 639–643.
78.
DixA.Ramduny-EllisD.WilkinsonJ. (2004). Trigger analysis: Understanding broken tasks. In DiaperD.StantonN. A. (Eds.), The handbook of task analysis for human-computer interaction (pp. 381–400). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
79.
D'OlivieraT. C. (2003). Dynamic spatial ability & ability to coordinate information: Predictive contributions of dynamic spatial ability and the ability to coordinate information for air traffic controller and pilot selection. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 3, 227–242.
80.
D'OlivieraT. C. (2004). Dynamic spatial ability: An exploratory analysis and a confirmatory study. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 14, 19–38.
81.
DollarC. S.SchroederD. J. (2004). A longitudinal study of Myers-Briggs personality types in air traffic controllers (DOT/FAA/AM-04/21). Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration Office of Aerospace Medicine.
82.
DuleyJ.CapriglioneC.KalitaS.GuentherL.NagyJ. (2006, September). Supervisory best practices for operational error prevention (DOT/FAA/AR-06/39). McLean, VA: Booz Allen Hamilton Inc.
83.
DursoF. T.BatsakesP. J.CrutchfieldJ. M.BradenJ. B.ManningC. A. (2004). The use of flight progress strips while working live traffic: Frequencies, importance, and perceived benefits. Human Factors, 46, 32–49.
84.
DursoF. T.BleckleyM. K.DattelA. R. (2006). Does SA add to the validity of cognitive tests? Human Factors, 48, 721–733.
85.
DursoF. T.CrutchfieldJ. M.HarveyC. M. (2007). The cooperative shift change: An illustration using air traffic control. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 8, 213–232.
86.
DursoF. T.DattellA. R. (2006). Expertise and transportation. In EricssonK. A.CharnessN.FeltovichP. J.HoffmanR. R. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 1084–1134). New York: Cambridge University Press.
87.
DursoF. T.GronlundS. D. (1999). Situation awareness. In DursoF. T.NickersonR. S.SchvaneveldtR. W.DumaisS. T.LindsayD. S.ChiM. T. H. (Eds.), Handbook of applied cognition (pp. 283–314). New York: Wiley.
88.
DursoF. T.HackworthC.TruittT. R.CrutchfieldJ.NikolicD.ManningC. A. (1998). Situation awareness as a predictor of performance in en route air traffic controllers. Air Traffic Control Quarterly, 6, 1–20.
89.
DursoF. T.SethumadhavanA. (2007). Talk to me Goose: A Review of C. Forsythe, M. L. Bernard, & T. E. Goldsmith's Cognitive systems. PsycCritiques, 52, release 33, article 55.
90.
DursoF. T.TruittT. R.HackworthC.CrutchfieldJ.ManningC. A. (1998). En route operational errors and situation awareness. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 8, 177–194.
91.
DuvergerA. (2005, November). Development of a mathematical weighted formula to eliminate the overlapping of aircraft labels on the ATC radar display (EEC Note No. 19/05). Brétigny-sur-Orge, France: EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre.
92.
EdgarE. (2002). Cognitive predictors in ATCO selection: Current and future perspectives. In EièfeltH.HeilM. C.BroachD. (Eds.), Staffing the ATM system: The selection of air traffic controllers (pp. 73–83). Aldershot, UKAshgate.
93.
EièfeltH. (2002). ATC-specific tests. In EièfeltH.HeilM. C.BroachD. (Eds.), Staffing the ATM system: The selection of air traffic controllers (pp. 85–96). Aldershot, UKAshgate.
94.
EièfeltH.DeuchertI. (2002). The selection system in use in Germany. In EièfeltH.HeilM. C.BroachD. (Eds.), Staffing the ATM system: The selection of air traffic controllers (pp. 121–130). Aldershot, UKAshgate.
95.
EièfeltH.HeintzA. (2002). Ability requirements for DFS controllers: Current and future. In EièfeltH.HeilM. C.BroachD. (Eds.), Staffing the ATM system: The selection of air traffic controllers (pp. 13–24). Aldershot, UKAshgate.
96.
EndsleyM. R. (1988, May). Situation Awareness Global Assessment Technique (SAGAT). Paper presented at the National Aerospace and Electronics Conference, Dayton, OH.
97.
EndsleyM. R. (1995). Toward a theory of situation awareness. Human Factors, 37, 32–64.
98.
EndsleyM. R.KirisE. O. (1995). Situation Awareness Global Assessment Technique (SAGAT) TRCON air traffic control version user's guide. Lubbock: Texas Tech University.
99.
EndsleyM. R.MogfordR.AllendoerferK.SnyderM.SteinE. S. (1997). Effect of free flight conditions on controller performance, workload, and situation awareness: A preliminary investigation of changes in locus of control using existing technology (DOT/FAA/CT-TN97/12). Atlantic City, NJ: William J. Hughes Technical Center.
100.
EndsleyM. R.RodgersM. D. (1994). Situation awareness information requirements analysis for en route air traffic control. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 38th Annual Meeting (pp. 71–75). Santa Monica, CA: SAGE Publications.
European Air Traffic Management Programme. (2002). Selection tests, interviews and assessment centres for ab initio trainee controllers: Guidelines for implementation (revised; HRS/MSP-002-GUI-03–01). Brussels, Belgium: Author.
103.
European Air Traffic Management Programme. (2003). Marketing and communication of the ATCO job—Phase 2 study: The ATCO job as perceived by its applicants (HRS/MSP-002-REP-03). Brussels, Belgium: Author.
104.
EverdijM. (2004). Review of techniques to support the E ATMP safety assessment methodology: Volume 1 (EEC Note No. 01/04). Brussels, Belgium: European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation.
105.
Federal Aviation Administration. (1984). Establishment and validation of en route sectors (DOT/FAA/Order 7210.46). Washington, DC: Author.
106.
Federal Aviation Administration. (2001). In Rantanen, E. (2004). Development and validation of objective performance and workload measures in air traffic control (AHFD-04–19/FAA-04–7). Oklahoma City, OK: Federal Aviation Administration Civil Aeromedical Institute.
FlynnG. M.LeleuC.HilburnB. (2006). A complexity study of the Maastricht upper airspace centre (Report No. 403). Brétigny-sur-Orge, France: EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre.
109.
ForsytheC.BernardM. L.GoldsmithT. E. (Eds.) (2006). Cognitive systems: Human cognitive models in system design. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
110.
GalsterS. M.DuleyJ. A.MasalonisA. J.ParasuramanR. (2001). Air traffic controller performance and workload under mature free flight: Conflict detection and resolution of aircraft self-separation. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 11, 71–93.
111.
GanderP. (2001). Fatigue management in air traffic control: The New Zealand approach. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology & Behaviour, 4, 49–62.
112.
GoillauP.KellyC.BoardmanM.JeannotE. (2003, May). Guidelines for trust in future ATM systems: Measures (HRS/HSP-005-GUI-02). Brussels, Belgium: European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation.
113.
GoldmanS.ManningC.PfleidererE. (2006). Static sector characteristics and operational errors (DOT/FAA/AM-06/4). Oklahoma City, OK: Civil Aeromedical Institute.
114.
GordonR.KennedyR.MearnsK.JensenC. L.KirwanB. (2006). Understanding safety culture in air traffic management (EEC Note No. 11/06). Brétigny-sur-Orge, France: EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre.
115.
GordonR.ShorrockS. T.PozziS.BoschieroA. (2005). Predicting and simulating human errors in using the airborne separation assurance system procedure. Human Factors and Aerospace Safety, 5, 43–60.
GrimaudI.HoffmanE.RogninL.ZeghalK. (2002). Towards a new controller-pilot task distribution to manage aircraft spacing: The controller. Journal of Air Traffic Control, 41(2), 21–23.
118.
GrimaudI.HoffmanE.RogninL.ZeghalK. (2003, March). EACAC 2001 real-time experiment: Initial evaluation of limited delegation of spacing to the flight deck (Vols. I–II, EEC Report No. 380). Brétigny-sur-Orge, France: EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre.
119.
GronlundS. D.DoughertyM. R. P.DursoF. T.CanningJ. M.MillsS. H. (2005). Planning in air traffic control: Impact of problem type. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 15, 269–293.
120.
GronlundS. D.OhrtD. D.DoughertyM. R. P.PerryJ. L.ManningC. A. (1998). Role of memory in air traffic control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 3, 263–280.
121.
GrossbergM. (1989). Relation of sector complexity to operational errors. In Quarterly Report of the FAA Office of Air Traffic Evaluations and Analysis. Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration.
122.
GuichardL.GuibertS.DohyD.GrauJ. Y. (2006, November). Paradigm shift: Contract of objectives investigation (EEC Note No. 16/06). Brétigny-sur-Orge, France: EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre.
123.
HadleyJ. (2004, June). High altitude proof of concept air traffic control demonstration (DOT/FAA/CT-TN04/24). Atlantic City, NJ: William J. Hughes Technical Center.
124.
HahS. (2002). Coordination between airway facilities specialists and air traffic personnel (DOT/FAA/CT-TN02/07). Atlantic City International Airport, NJ: Federal Aviation Administration William J. Hughes Technical Center.
125.
HarrisonY.HorneJ. A. (2000). The impact of sleep deprivation on decision making: A Review. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 6, 236–249.
126.
HartS. G.StavelandL. E. (1988). Development of a multi-dimensional workload rating scale: Results of empirical and theoretical research. In HancockP. A.MeshkatiN. (Eds.), Human mental workload (pp. 139–183). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
127.
HaussY.EyferthK. (2003). Securing future ATM-concepts' safety by measuring situation awareness in AT C. Aerospace Science and Technology, 7, 417–427.
128.
HeilM. C.DetwilerC. A.AgenR.WilliamsC. A.AgnewB. O.KingR. E. (2002). The effects of practice and coaching on the air traffic selection and training test battery (DOT/FAA/AM-02/24). Oklahoma City, OK: Civil Aeromedical Institute..
129.
HeilM. C.ReeseN. S. (2002). FAA air traffic controller selection in the United States. In EièfeltH.HeilM. C.BroachD. (Eds.), Staffing the ATM system: The selection of air traffic controllers (pp. 109–119). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
130.
HelmreichR. L.KlinectJ. R.WilhelmJ. A. (1999). Models of threat, error, and CRM in flight operations. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (pp. 677–682). Columbus, OH: Ohio State University.
131.
HendersonJ.GordonR. (2005). Changes in ATM safety culture due to new technology (EEC Note No. 13/05). Brétigny-sur-Orge, France: EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre.
132.
HeringH. (2005, November). Air traffic freeway system for Europe (EEC Note 20/05). Brétigny-sur-Orge, France: EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre.
133.
HilburnB. (2004). Cognitive complexity in air traffic control: A literature review (EEC Note No. 04/04). Brétigny-sur-Orge, France: EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre.
134.
HilburnB. G.BakkerM. W. P.PekelaW. D.ParasuramanR. (1997, October). The effects of free flight on air traffic controller mental workload, monitoring and system performance. Paper presented at the 10th International CEAS Conference on Free Flight, Amsterdam.
135.
HilburnB. G.HaagM. U.FlynnG. (2005). Modeling cognitive complexity in air traffic control. Human Factors and Aerospace Safety, 5, 169–182.
136.
HistonJ. M.HansmanR. J.GottliebB.KleinwaksH.YensonS.DelahayeD., et al. (2002, October). Structural considerations and cognitive complexity in air traffic control. Paper presented at the 19th IEEE/AIAA Digital Avionics Systems Conference, Irvine, CA.
137.
HoC. Y.NikolicM. I.WatersM. J.SarterN. B. (2004). Not now! Supporting interruption management by indicating the modality and urgency of pending tasks. Human Factors, 46, 399–409.
138.
HollnagelE. (1993). Human reliability analysis: Context and control. London: Academic Press.
139.
HurstM. W.RoseR. M. (1978). Objective job difficulty, behavioral response, and sector characteristics in air route traffic control centres. Ergonomics, 21, 697–708.
140.
International Civil Aviation Organization. (2006). Safety management manual (Doc 9859 AN/460). Montreal, Quebec, Canada: Author. Retrieved August 18, 2008, from http://www.icao.int/icaonet/dcs/9859/9859.html.
141.
IrvineR.ShawC. (2004, September). Layers of parallel tracks: A speculative approach to the prevention of crossing conflicts between cruising aircraft (EEC Note No. 09/04). Brétigny-sur-Orge, France: EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre.
142.
IsaacA.DuchenneC.MoulinL.HindsonG. (2002). The investigation of human error in ATM simulation: The toolkit (H RS/HSP-002-REP-06). Brussels, Belgium: European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation.
143.
IsaacA.LyonsM.BoveT.Van DammeD. (2003). Validation of the human error in ATM (HERA-Janus) technique (HRS/HSP-002-REP-04). Brussels, Belgium: European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation.
144.
IsaacA.ShorrockS. T.KennedyR.KirwanB.AndersenH.BoveT. (2002a, April). Short report on human performance models and taxonomies of human error in ATM (HERA; HRS/HSP-002-REP-02). Brussels, Belgium: European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation.
145.
IsaacA.ShorrockS. T.KennedyR.KirwanB.AndersenH.BoveT. (2002b, April). Technical review of human performance models and taxonomies of human error in ATM (HERA; HRS/HSP-002-REP-01). Brussels, Belgium: European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation.
146.
JacksonA.DorbesA.GeisselM. (2004). CoRe Project: Baseline exemplary style guide (HRS/HSP-006-GUI-01). Brussels, Belgium: European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation.
147.
JeannotE.KellyC.ThompsonD. (2003). The development of situation awareness measures in ATM systems (HRS/HSP-005-REP-01). Brussels, Belgium: EUROCONTROL.
148.
JolitzG. D. (1965). Evaluation of a mathematical model for use in computing control load at ATC facilities (Report No. RD-65–69). Atlantic City, NJ: Federal Aviation Administration.
KaberD. B.PerryC. M.SegallN.McClernonC. K.PrinzelL. J.III. (2006). Situation awareness implications of adaptive automation for information processing in an air traffic control-related task. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 36, 447–462.
151.
KaberD. B.WrightM. C.PrinzelL. J.ClamannM. P. (2005). Adaptive automation of human-machine system information-processing functions. Human Factors, 47, 730–741.
152.
KarstenG.GoldbergB.RoodR.SultzerR. (1975). Oculomotor measurement of air traffic controller visual attention (FAA-NA-74–61). Atlantic City, NJ: DOT/FAA Technical Center.
153.
Kasteleijn-Nolst TreniteD. G.VermeirenR. (2005). The impact of subclinical epileptiform discharges on complex tasks and cognition: Relevance for aircrew and air traffic controllers. University Medical Centre Utrecht, Lundlaan 6, de Uithof, 3584 EA Utrecht, Netherlands.
154.
KellyC. (2003, May). Guidelines for trust in future ATM systems: Principles (HRS/HSP-005-GUI-03). Brussels, Belgium: European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation.
155.
KernsK. (1991). Data link communications between controllers and pilots: A Review and synthesis of the simulation literature. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 1, 181–204.
156.
KingR. E.ManningC.A.DrechslerG. K. (2007, May). Operational use of the air traffic selection and training battery (DOT/FAA/AM-07/14). Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration Office of Aerospace Medicine.
157.
KingR. E.RetzlaffP. D.DetwilerC. A.SchroederD. J.BroachD. (2003). Use of personality assessment measures in the selection of air traffic control specialists (DOT/FAA/AM-03/20). Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration.
158.
KirwanB.ScaifeR.KennedyR. (2001). Investigating complexity factors in UK air traffic management. Human Factors and Aerospace Safety, 1(2), 125–144.
159.
KnechtW.SmithK.HancockP. (1996). A dynamic conflict probe and Index of collision risk. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 40th Annual Meeting (pp. 106–110). Santa Monica, CA: SAGE Publications.
160.
KopardekarP. (2000). Dynamic density: A review of proposed variables (FAA NAS Advanced Concepts Branch ACT-540). Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration.
161.
KopardekarP.MagyaritsS. (2003, June). Measurement and prediction of dynamic density. Paper presented at the 5th EUROCONTROL/FAA Air Traffic Management Research and Development Conference, Budapest, Hungary.
162.
KorosA.Della RoccoP. S.PanjwaniG.IngurgioV.D'ArcyJ. F. (2003). Complexity in air traffic control towers: A field study: Part 1. Complexity factors (DOT/FAA/CT-TN03/14). Atlantic City, NJ: Federal Aviation Administration.
163.
KroisP.RehmannJ. (2005). Assessing human factors risks in air traffic management research (DOT/FAA/TN-AR-05/1). Atlantic City, NJ: William J. Hughes Technical Center.
164.
KuharW. T.GavelP.MorelandJ. A. (1976). Impact of automation upon air traffic control system productivity/capacity (ARTS-III; Report No. FAA-RD-77–39). Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration.
165.
LaudemanI.SheldenS.BranstromR.BrasilC. (1998). Dynamic density: An air traffic management metric (NAS/TM-1998–112226). Moffett Field, CA: Ames Research Center, NASA.
166.
LeeK.KernsK.BoneR.NickelsonM. (2001). Development and validation of the controller acceptance rating scale (CARS): Results of empirical research. In Proceedings of the 4th USA/Europe Air Traffic Management R&D Seminar. Retrieved August 18, 2008, from http://atm2001.eurocontrol.fr/paper_014.
167.
LigganM. E. (2006, December). Analyses of ERAM automation consolidation issues (MTR060199). McLean, VA: MITRE Center for Advanced Aviation System Development.
168.
LoftS.SandersonP.NealA.MooijM. (2007). Modeling and predicting mental workload in en route air traffic control: Critical Review and broader implications. Human Factors, 49, 376–399.
169.
LowI. (2004, August). A tool for the assessment of the impact of change in automated ATM systems on mental workload (HRS/HSP-005-REP-03). Brussels, Belgium: European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation.
170.
LowryN. M.MacWilliamsK. J.StillR. J.WalkerM. G. (2005). Analysis of operational errors (Report No. MP05W0000025, Rev. 1). McLean, VA: MITRE Center for Advanced Aviation System Development.
171.
LozitoS.VermaS.MartinL.DunbarM.McGannA. (2003). The impact of voice, data link and mixed air traffic control environments on flight deck procedures. Brétigny-sur-Orge, France: EUROCONTROL. Retrieved August 18, 2008, from http://atm2001.eurocontrol.fr/5th-usa-europe-atm-r-d-seminar/paper_057.
172.
MajumdarA.OchiengW. Y. (2000). The factors affecting air traffic controller workload: A multivariate analysis based upon simulation modelling of controller workload. Centre for Transport Studies, Imperial College, London.
173.
ManningC. A.HansonM. A. (2002). Criterion measures of air traffic controller job performance: The current state of affairs. In EièfeltH.HeilM. C.BroachD. (Eds.), Staffing the ATM system: The selection of air traffic controllers (pp. 45–57). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
174.
ManningC. A.MillsS. H.FoxC. M.PfleidererE.MogilkaH. J. (2000, June). Investigating the validity of performance and objective workload evaluation research (POWER). Paper presented at the 3rd US/Europe Air Traffic Management R & D Seminar, Naples, Italy. Retrieved August 18, 2008, from http://atm2001eurocontrol.fr/3rd-usa-europe-atm-r-d-seminar/paper_066.
175.
ManningC. A.MillsS. H.FoxC.PfleidererE.MogilkaH. J. (2001). Investigating the validity of performance and objective workload evaluation research (POWER; DOT/FAA/AM-01/10). Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration.
176.
ManningC. A.MillsS. H.FoxC.PfleidererE. M.MogilkaH. J. (2002). Using air traffic control taskload measures and communication events to predict subjective workload (DOT/FAA/AM-02/4). Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration.
177.
ManningC. A.PfleidererE. M. (2006). Relationship of sector activity and sector complexity to air traffic control taskload (DOT/FAA/AM-06/29). Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration.
178.
ManningC. A.SteinE. (2005). Measuring air traffic controller performance in the 21st century. In KirwanB.RodgersM.SchaferD. (Eds.), Human factors impacts in air traffic management (pp. 283–316). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
179.
MartiP.ScrivaniP. (2003). The representation of context in the simulation of complex systems. Cognitive Ergonomics, 8, 34–44.
180.
MartinL.KozonT.VermaS.LozitoS. C. (2006). Using neural networks to explore air traffic controller workload (NTRS: 2006–08–02, Accession No. 75N27202). Moffett Field, CA: Ames Research Center, NASA.
181.
MasalonisA. J.CallahamM. B.WankeC. R. (2003). Dynamic density and complexity metrics for realtime traffic flow management. Bedford, MA: The MITRE Corporation.
182.
McAnultyM.ZingaleC. (2005). Pilot-based spacing and separation on approach to landing: The effect on air traffic controller workload and performance (DOT/FAA/CT-05/14). Atlantic City, NJ: William J. Hughes Technical Center.
183.
McCloughA. C.RogelbergS. G. (2003). Selection in teams: An exploration of the Teamwork Knowledge, Skills, and Ability Test. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11(1), 56–66.
MetzgerU.ParasuramanR. (2001). The role of the air traffic controller in future air traffic management: An empirical study of active control versus passive monitoring. Human Factors, 43, 519–528.
186.
MetzgerU.ParasuramanR. (2006). Effects of automated conflict cuing and traffic density on air traffic controller performance and visual attention in a Datalink environment. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 16, 343–362.
187.
MilburnN. (2004). A historical review of color vision standards for air traffic control specialists at automated flight service stations (DOT/FAA/AM-04/10). Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration Office of Aerospace Medicine.
188.
MillsS. H.PfleidererE. M.ManningC. A. (2002). POWER: Objective activity and taskload measurement in en route air traffic control (DOT/FAA/AM-02/2). Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration.
189.
MoertlP. M.CanningJ. M.GronlundS. D.DoughertyM. RJohanssonJ.MillsS. H. (2002). Aiding planning in air traffic control: An experimental investigation of the effects of perceptual information integration. Human Factors, 44, 404–412.
190.
MogfordR. H. (1997). Mental models and situation awareness in air traffic control. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 7, 331–341.
191.
MogfordR. H.GuttmanJ. A.MorrowS. L.KopardekarP. (1995). The complexity construct in air traffic control: A review and synthesis of the literature (DOT/FAA/CT-TN92/22). Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration.
192.
MogfordR. H.MurphyE. D.GuttmanJ. A. (1993). The use of direct and indirect techniques to study airspace complexity factors in air traffic control. In Proceedings of the First Mid-Atlantic Human Factors Conference (pp. 196–202). New York: ACM Press.
193.
MorathR. A.QuartettiD.BaylessA.ArchambaultC. (2001). Air traffic controller job analysis. In RamosR.HeilM. C.ManningC. A. (Eds.), Documentation of validity for the AT-SAT computerized test battery: Volume 1 (DOT/FAA/AM-01/5, pp. 7–18). Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration Office of Aerospace Medicine.
194.
MorayN. (2007). Industrial systems. In DursoF. T. (Ed.), Handbook of applied cognition (pp. 271–306). West Sussex, UK: Wiley.
195.
MurphyL. L.SmithK.HancockP. A. (2004). Task demand and response error in a simulated air traffic control task: Implications for ab initio training. International Journal of Applied Aviation Studies, 4, 91–106.
196.
NadlerE. (2005, August). Human factors integration challenges in the traffic flow management (TFM) environment (DOT-VNTSC-FAA-05–08). Cambridge, MA: Volpe National Transportation Systems Center.
197.
NataleV.MartoniM.CicognaP. (2003). Effects of circadian typology on sleep-wake behavior of air traffic controllers. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 57, 539–541.
198.
NiessenC.EyferthK.BierwagenT. (1999). Modeling cognitive processes of experienced air traffic controllers. Ergonomics, 42, 1507–1520.
199.
NunesA.SchollB. J. (2004, March). Interactions between convergence angle, traffic load, and altitude distribution in air traffic control. Paper presented at the 3rd annual conference on Human Performance, Situation Awareness and Automation Technology, Daytona Beach, FL.
200.
OakesD. W.FerrisG. R.MartocchioJ. J.BuckleyM. R.BroachD. (2001). Cognitive ability and personality predictors of training program skill acquisition and job performance. Journal of Business and Psychology, 15, 523–548.
201.
PaceL. A.SchoenfeldtL. F. (1977). Legal concerns with the use of weighted application blanks. Personnel Psychology, 31, 243–247.
202.
PaiS.AllendoerferK. (2005, August). Conference control system computer-human interface prototype description and design rationale (DOT/FAA/CT-TN05/06). Atlantic City, NJ: William J. Hughes Technical Center.
203.
ParièsJ.BiederC.ReasonJ.IsaacA. (2003). The development of a safety management tool within ATM (HERA-SMART; HRS/HSP-002-REP-08). Brussels, Belgium: European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation.
204.
PatankarM. S.Bigda-PeytonT.SabinE.BrownJ.KellyT. (2005). A comparative review of safety cultures. Saint Louis, MO: Saint Louis University.
205.
PaternoF.SantoroC. (2002). Preventing user errors by systematic analysis of deviations from the system task model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 56, 225–245.
206.
PawlakW. S.BrintonC. R.CrouchK.LancasterM. (1996, July). A framework for the evaluation of air traffic control complexity. AIAA Guidance Navigation and Control Conference (AIAA Paper 96–3856). Reston, VA: AIAA.
207.
PecenaY. (2002). Behavior-oriented assessment of interpersonal skills in ATCO selection. In EièfeltH.HeilM. C.BroachD. (Eds.), Staffing the ATM system: The selection of air traffic controllers (pp. 97–105). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
208.
PetersonL.BaileyL.WillemsB. (2001). Controller-to-controller communication and coordination taxonomy (C4T; DOT/FAA/AM-01/19). Washington, DC: Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, Office of Aerospace Medicine.
209.
PfleidererE.M. (2000). Multidimensional scaling analysis of controllers' perceptions of aircraft performance characteristics (DOT/FAA/AM-00/24). Oklahoma City, OK: Federal Aviation Administration.
210.
PfleidererE.ManningC.GoldmanS. (2007). Relationship of complexity factor ratings with operational errors (DOT/FAA/AM-07/11). Oklahoma City, OK: Civil Aeromedical Institute.
211.
PorterfieldD. A. (1997). Evaluating controller communication time as a measure of workload. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 7(2), 171–182.
212.
PoundsJ.IsaacA. (2002). Development of an FAA-Eurocontrol technique for the analysis of human error in ATM (DOT/FAA/AM-02/12). Washington, DC: Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, Office of Aerospace Medicine.
213.
PoundsJ.IsaacA. (2003). Validation of the JANUS technique: Causal factors of human error in operational errors (DOT/FAA/AM-03/21). Washington, DC: Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, Office of Aerospace Medicine.
214.
PoundsJ.RodgersM. D.ThompsonD.JackD. (2006). Developing temporal markers to profile operational errors (DOT/FAA/AM-06/20). Oklahoma City, OK: Federal Aviation Administration Civil Aeromedical Institute.
215.
PrinzoO. V. (2001). Data-linked pilot reply time on controller workload and communication in a simulated terminal option (DOT/FAA/AM-01/8). Washington, DC: Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, Office of Aerospace Medicine.
216.
PrinzoO. V. (2002). Effects of communication modes and data link pilot reply time on controller workload and communication tasks in a simulated terminal airspace. Air Traffic Controller Quarterly, 10, 309–337.
217.
PrinzoO. V.BrittonT. W. (1993). ATC/Pilot voice communications: A survey of the literature (DOT/FAA/AM-93/20). Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration.
218.
PrinzoO. V.HendrixA. M.HendrixR. (2006). The outcome of ATC message complexity on pilot readback performance (DOT/FAA/AM-06/25). Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration.
219.
PrinzoO. V.MorrowD. G. (2002). Improving pilot/air traffic control voice communication in general aviation. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 12, 341–357.
220.
PurvesK.VergneF. (2005, September). COSPACE 2004 controller model based study assessment of airborne spacing tasks in the TMA (EEC Report No. 400). Brétigny-sur-Orge, France: EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre.
221.
QuartettiD.KieckhaeferW.HoustonJ. (2001). Predictor development background. In RamosR.HeilM. C.ManningC. (Eds.), Documentation of validity for the AT-SAT computerized test battery: Volume 1 (DOT/FAA/AM-01/5, pp. 19–26). Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration Office of Aerospace Medicine.
222.
RamosR. A.HeilM. C.ManningC. A. (Eds.) (2001). Documentation of the validity for the AT-SAT computerized test battery: Volume 1 (DOT/FAA/AM-01/05). Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration Office of Aviation Medicine.
223.
RantanenE. (2004). Development and validation of objective performance and workload measures in air traffic control (AHFD-04–19/FAA-04–7). Oklahoma City, OK: Federal Aviation Administration Civil Aeromedical Institute.
224.
RantanenE. M.McCarleyJ. S.XuX. (2004). Time delays in air traffic control communication loop: Effect on controller performance and workload. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 14, 369–394.
225.
RantanenE. M.NaseriA.NeogiN. (2007). Evaluation of airspace complexity and dynamic density metrics derived from operational data. Air Traffic Control Quarterly, 15, 65–88.
226.
RantanenE. M.YeakelS. J.SteelmanK. S. (2005, January). En route controller task prioritization research to support CE-6 human performance modeling (HFD-05–03/MAAD-05–3). Savoy: Human Factors Division, Institute of Aviation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
227.
RantanenE. M.YeakelS. J.SteelmanK. S. (2006, July). En route controller task prioritization research to support CE-6 human performance modeling Phase II: Analysis of high-fidelity simulation data (HFD-06–03/MAAD-06–2). Savoy: Human Factors Division, Institute of Aviation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
228.
ReasonJ. (1990). Human error. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
229.
RemingtonR. W.JohnstonJ. C.RuthruffE.GoldM.RomeraM. (2000). Visual search in complex displays: Factors affecting conflict detection by air traffic controllers. Humans Factors, 42, 349–366.
230.
RieraB.DebernardS. (2003). Basic cognitive principles applied to the design of advanced supervisory systems for process control. In HollnagelE. (Ed.), Handbook of cognitive task design (pp. 255–281). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
231.
RodgersM. D.MogfordR. H.MogfordL. S. (1998). The relationship of sector characteristics to operational errors (DOT/FAA/AM-98/14). Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration.
232.
RoessinghJ.ZonR. (2004, October). A measure to assess the impact of automation on teamwork (HRS/HSP-005-REP-07). Brussels, Belgium: European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation.
ScarboroughA.BaileyL.PoundsJ. (2005). Examining ATC operational errors using the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (DOT/FAA/AM-05/25). Washington, DC: Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, Office of Aerospace Medicine.
235.
SchaeferD. (2001). Context-sensitive speech recognition in the air traffic control simulation (EEC Note 02/2001). Brétigny-sur-Orge, France: EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre.
236.
SchmidtD. K. (1976). On modeling ATC workload and sector capacity. Journal of Aircraft, 13(7), 531–537.
237.
SchroederD. S.BaileyL.PoundsJ.ManningC. A. (2006). A human factors review of the operational error literature (DOT/FAA/AM-06/21). Washington, DC: Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, Office of Aerospace Medicine.
238.
SeamsterT. L.ReddingR. E.KaempfG. L. (1997). Applied cognitive task analysis in aviation. Brookfield, VT: Avebury Aviation.
239.
SethumadhavanA.DursoF. T. (in press). TRACON controller cooperative shift changes.
240.
SheridanT. B. (1992). Telerobotics, automation, and human supervisory control. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
241.
SheridanT. B.CorkerK. M.NadlerE. D. (2006, November). Final report and recommendations for research on human-automation interaction in the Next Generation Air Transportation System (DOT-VNTSC-NASA-06–05). Cambridge, MA: U.S. Department of Transportation, Research and Innovative Technology Administration.
242.
SheridanT. B.NadlerE. D. (2006, October). A review of human-automation interaction failures and lessons learned (DOT-VNTSC-NASA-06–01). Cambridge, MA: Volpe National Transportation Systems Center, Research and Innovative Technology Administration.
243.
ShorrockS.KirwanB.SmithE. (2005). Performance prediction in air traffic management: Applying human error analysis approaches to new concepts. In KirwanB.RodgersM.SchaferD. (Eds.), Human factors impacts in air traffic management (pp. 351–386). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
244.
ShorrockS. T.StraeterO. (2006). A framework for managing system disturbances and insights from air traffic management. Ergonomics, 49, 1326–1344.
245.
SieglerR. S.ChenZ. (2002). Development of rules and strategies: Balancing the old and the new. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 81, 446–457.
246.
SmithK.McCoyC. E.OrasanuJ. (2001). Distributed cooperative problem-solving in the air traffic management system. In SalasE.KleinG. (Eds.), Linking expertise and naturalistic decision making (pp. 367–381). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
247.
SmithR. E.HuntR. R.McVayJ. C.McConnellM. D. (2007). The cost of event-based prospective memory: Salient target events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 734–746.
248.
SmithK.ScallenS. F.KnechtW.HancockP. A. (1998). An Index of dynamic density. Human Factors, 40, 69–78.
249.
Smith-JentschK. A.BakerD. P.SalasE.Cannon-BowersJ. A. (2001). Uncovering differences in team competency requirements: The case of air traffic control teams. In SalasE.BowersC. A.EdensE. (Eds.), Improving teamwork in organizations: Applications of resource management training (pp. 31–54). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
250.
Smith-JentschK. A.MathieuJ. E.KraigerK. (2005). Investigating linear and interactive effects of shared mental models on safety and efficiency in a field setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 523–535.
251.
SoedeM.CoeterierJ. F.StassenH. G. (1971). Time analyses of the tasks of approach controllers in ATC. Ergonomics, 14, 591–601.
252.
SollenbergerR. L.WillemsB.Della RoccoP. S.KorosA.TruittT. (2005, February). Human-in-the-loop simulation evaluating the collocation of the user request evaluation tool, traffic management advisor, and controller-pilot data link communications: Experiment I—Tool combinations (DOT/FAA/CT-TN04/28). Atlantic City, NJ: William J. Hughes Technical Center.
253.
SperandioJ. C. (1971). Variation of operator's strategies and regulating effects on workload. Ergonomics, 14, 571–577.
254.
SperandioJ. C. (1978). The regulation of working methods as a function of workload among air traffic controllers. Ergonomics, 21, 195–202.
255.
SpougeJ.PerrinE. (2005). 2004 baseline integrated risk picture for air traffic management in Europe (EEC Note No. 15/05). Brétigny-sur-Orge, France: EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre.
256.
SridharB.ShethK. S.GrabbeS. (1998). Airspace complexity and its application in air traffic management. Proceedings of the 2nd USA/Europe Air Traffic Management R&D Seminar.
257.
JohnM.St.CowenM. B.SmallmanH. S.OonkH. M. (2001). The use of 2D and 3D displays for shape-understanding versus relative-position tasks. Human Factors, 43, 79–98.
258.
SteinE. (1985). Air traffic controller workload: An examination of workload probe (DOT/FAA/CT-TN84/24). Atlantic City, NJ: Federal Aviation Administration.
259.
SteinE. S.Della RoccoP. S.SollenbergerR. L. (2006, May). Dynamic resectorization in air traffic control: A human factors perspective (DOT/FAA/CT-TN06/19). Atlantic City, NJ: William J. Hughes Technical Center.
260.
StoneM.DismukesK.RemingtonR. (2001). Prospective memory in dynamic environments: Effects of load, delay, and phonological rehearsal. Memory, 9, 165–176.
261.
TaberN. J.WilmouthG. E.JacobsG. J. (2006, May). Operational concept for initial integrated collaborative rerouting (ICR; MP 06W0000098). McLean, VA: MITRE Center for Advanced Aviation System Development.
262.
TruittT. (2006a, February). Electronic flight data in airport traffic control towers: Literature review (DOT/FAA/CT-05/13). Atlantic City, NJ: William J. Hughes Technical Center.
263.
TruittT. (2006b, December). Concept development and design description of electronic flight data interfaces for airport traffic control towers (DOT/FAA/TC-TN-06/17). Atlantic City, NJ: William J. Hughes Technical Center.
264.
TuckerP.SmithL.MacdonaldI.FolkardS. (2000). Effects of direction in continuous and discontinuous 8 hour shift systems. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 57, 678–684.
265.
VogtJ.AdolphL.AyanT.UdovicA.KastnerM. (2002). Stress in modern air traffic control systems and potential influences on memory. Human Factors and Aerospace Safety, 2, 355–378.
266.
VogtJ.HagemannT.KastnerM. (2006). The impact of workload on heart rate and blood pressure in en-route and tower air traffic control. Journal of Psychophysiology, 20, 297–314.
267.
VollerL.LowI. (2004). Impact of automation on future controller skill requirements and a framework for their prediction (HRS/HSP-005-REP-04). Brussels, Belgium: European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation.
268.
WalkerM. (2004, September). Analysis for enabling benefits at user request evaluation tool (URET) field sites (MTR 04W0000082). McLean, VA: MITRE Center for Advanced Aviation System Development.
269.
WeissT. M.BennerW. E.CartyT. C. (2004). Integrated terminal weather system (ITWS) operational test (OT) final report—First article version: Volume I (DOT/FAA/CT-TN04/14). Atlantic City, NJ: William J. Hughes Technical Center.
WickensC. D.LeeJ. D.LiuY.Gordon-BeckerS.E., (2004). An introduction to human factors engineering (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
272.
WickensC. D.MavorA. S.McGeeJ. P. (1997). Flight to the future: Human factors in air traffic control. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
273.
WiegmannD. A.ShappellS. A. (2003). A human error approach to aviation accident analysis: The human factors analysis and classification system. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
274.
WillemsB.HeineyM. (2002, April). Decision support automation research in the en route air traffic control environment (DOT/FAA/CT-TN02/10). Atlantic City, NJ: William J. Hughes Technical Center.
275.
WillemsB.HeineyM.SollenbergerR. (2005, February). Study of an ATC baseline for the evaluation of team configurations: Effects of allocating multisector control functions to a radar associate or airspace coordinator position (DOT/FAA/CT-05/07). Atlantic City, NJ: William J. Hughes Technical Center.
276.
WillemsB.KorosA. (2007, June). Advanced concept of the national airspace system of 2015: Human factors considerations for air traffic control (DOT/FAA/TC-TN-07/21). Atlantic City, NJ: William J. Hughes Technical Center.
277.
WilsonG. F.RussellC. A. (2003). Operator functional state classification using multiple psychophysiological features in an air traffic control task. Human Factors, 45, 381–389.
278.
WindsorP. (2004). Using task data in designing the Swanwick Air Traffic Control Centre. In DiaperD.StantonN. A. (Eds.), The handbook of task analysis for human-computer interaction (pp. 267–273). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
279.
Wyndemere, Inc. (1996). An evaluation of air traffic control complexity (Final report contract NAS2–14284). Boulder, CO: Author.
280.
XingJ. (2006). Reexamination of color vision standards, part III: Analysis of the effects of color vision deficiencies in using ATC displays (DOT/FAA/AM-06/11). Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration Office of Aerospace Medicine.
281.
XingJ. (2007). Developing the Federal Aviation Administration's requirements for color use in air traffic control displays (DOT/FAA/AM-06). Washington, DC: Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, Office of Aerospace Medicine.
282.
XingJ.SchroederD. J. (2006a). Reexamination of color vision standards, part I: Status of color use in ATC displays and demography of color-deficit controllers (DOT/FAA/AM-06/2). Washington, DC: Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, Office of Aerospace Medicine.
283.
XingJ.SchroederD. J. (2006b). Reexamination of color vision standards, part II: A computational method to assess the effect of color deficiencies in using ATC displays (DOT/FAA/AM-06/6). Washington, DC: Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, Office of Aerospace Medicine.
284.
YuditskyT.Friedman-BergF.SmithA. (2004, November). Design of information display systems for air traffic control (DOT/FAA/CT-TN04/33). Atlantic City, NJ: William J. Hughes Technical Center.
