The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention report that accidents rated as the fifth leading cause of death in 2002. A large proportion of these accidents occur in and around the home. For 2003, the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) estimated that just under 11 million injuries were caused by children's nursery equipment; toys; sports and recreational equipment; home communication and entertainment; household containers; yard and garden equipment; home workshop equipment; home maintenance; general household appliances; heating, cooling, and ventilation equipment; home furnishings and fixtures; and home structures and construction materials. Even those products that are safe to use may not be designed to allow the user to be maximally effective when using those products. This chapter describes a framework that can provide a foundation for understanding the components that play a role in making products safe and effective, a process that can be used by designers to ensure a consideration of the components of the framework, and a discussion of the extent to which consumers select products based on these features. Difficulties in conducting research in this area are identified, as well as some directions for future work.
BadlerN. I.LeeP.PhillipsC.OtaniE. (1989). The Jack interactive human model. In Proceedings of the First Annual Symposium on Mechanical System Design in a Concurrent Engineering Environment (pp. 179–198). Iowa City: University of Iowa.
3.
BaeckerR. M.BuxtonW. A. S. (1987). Readings in human-computer interaction: A multidisciplinary approach. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
4.
BarrettL. F.TugadeM. M.EngleR. W. (2004). Individual differences in working memory capacity and dual-process theories of the mind. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 553–573.
5.
BenedykR.MinisterS. (1998). Evaluation of product safety using the BeSafe method. In StantonN. (Ed.), Human factors in consumer products (pp. 55–74). London: Taylor & Francis.
6.
BrusebergA.McDonagh-PhilpD. (2001). New product development by eliciting user experience and aspirations. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 55, 435–452.
7.
CarswellC. M.LioC.McNallyJ. (2004). How knowledgeable are salespeople about the usability of their merchandise? In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 48th Annual Meeting (pp. 990–994). Santa Monica, CA: SAGE Publications.
8.
ChapanisA. (1996). Human factors in systems engineering. New York: Wiley.
9.
ChapanisA.LindenbaumL. E. (1959). A reaction time study of four control-display linkages. Human Factors, 1, 1–7.
10.
CohenH. H. (2000, Spring). A field study of stair descent. Ergonomics in Design, 8, 11–15.
11.
ColomR.RebolloI.PalaciosA.Juan-EspinosaM.KyllonenP. C. (2004). Working memory is (almost) perfectly predicted by g. Intelligence, 32, 277–296.
CooperA. (1999). The inmates are running the asylum: Why high tech products drive us crazy and how to restore the sanity. Indianapolis, IN: Sams.
14.
DanuserB.MoserD.Vitale-SethreT.HirsigR.KruegerH. (2003). Performance in a complex task and breathing under odor exposure. Human Factors, 45, 549–562.
15.
DempsterF. N.CorkillA. J. (1999). Individual differences in susceptibility to interference and general cognitive ability. Acta Psychologica, 101, 395–416.
16.
DruryC. G. (1990). Methods for direct observation of performance. In WilsonJ. R.CorlettN. I. (Eds.), Evaluation of human work (pp. 35–57). London: Taylor & Francis.
Environmental Protection Agency. (n.d.). Ozone generators that are sold as air cleaners: An assessment of effectiveness and health consequences. Retrieved October 20, 2005, from http://www.epa.gov/iaq/pubs/ozonegen.html.
19.
EricssonK. A.SimonH. A. (1996). Protocol analysis. Cambridge: MIT Press.
20.
Federal Occupational Health. (2005, Spring). Exposure to solvent and cleaning product fumes may increase the risk for childhood asthma. Let's Talk, 2.
21.
GrayW. D.AltmannE. M. (2001). Cognitive modeling and human-computer interaction. In KarwowskiW. (Ed.), International encyclopedia of ergonomics and human factors (Vol. 1, pp. 387–391). New York: Taylor & Francis.
22.
GrayW. D.Boehm-DavisD. A. (2000). Milliseconds matter: An introduction to microstrategies and to their use in describing and predicting interactive behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 6, 322–335.
23.
HanS. H.HongS. W. (2003). A systematic approach for coupling user satisfaction with product design. Ergonomics, 46, 1441–1461.
24.
HansenW. J. (1971). User engineering principles for interactive systems. In Proceedings of the Joint Computer Conference, 39 (pp. 523–532). Montvale, NJ: AFIPS Press.
25.
HeavenorG. (2000). Improving utensil and implement handle design through enhanced rotation and tilt. In McCabeP. T.HansonM. A.RovertsonS. A. (Eds.), Contemporary ergonomics 2000 (pp. 291–295). London: Taylor & Francis and the Ergonomics Society.
26.
HedgeA.JaitliR.JagdeoJ.RuderM.AkaogiM. (2003). Effects of chair design on toddler behavior. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 47th Annual Meeting (pp. 932–936). Santa Monica, CA: SAGE Publications.
27.
HekkertP.SneldersD.van WieringenP. C. W. (2003). “Most advanced, yet acceptable”: Typicality and novelty as joint predictors of aesthetic preference in industrial design. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 111–124.
28.
HewettT. T. (1986). The role of iterative evaluation in designing systems for usability. In HarrisonM. D.MonkA. F. (Eds.), People and computers: Designing for usability (pp. 196–214). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
29.
HideS.MorrisW.HaslegraveC. M.OkunribidoO. O.NicholsS. C. (2000). Evaluating the use of single disc floor cleaners. In McCabeP. T.HansonM. A.RobertsonS. A. (Eds.), Contemporary ergonomics 2000 (pp. 307–311). London: Taylor & Francis and the Ergonomics Society.
30.
HixD.HartsonH. R. (1993). Developing user interfaces: Ensuring usability through product and process. New York: Wiley.
31.
HustonR. L. (1987). An overview of safety engineering in human factors. In MarkL. S.WarmJ. S.HustonR. L. (Eds.), Ergonomics and human factors (pp. 180–187). New York: Springer-Verlag.
32.
JohnB.PrevasK.SalvucciD.KoedingerK. (2004). Predictive human performance modeling made easy. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 455–462). New York: ACM Press.
33.
JohnsonD. A. (1998). New stairway—old problems. Ergonomics in Design, 6(4), 7–10.
34.
JordanP. W. (1999a). Kansei engineering and design. In GreenW. S.JordanP. W. (Eds.), Human factors in product design: Current practice and future trends (pp. 229–233). London: Taylor & Francis.
35.
JordanP. W. (1999b). Pleasure with products: Human factors for body, mind, and soul. In GreenW. S.JordanP. W. (Eds.), Human factors in product design: Current practice and future trends (pp. 206–217). London: Taylor & Francis.
36.
KahnemanD. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58, 697–720.
37.
KaneM. J.HambrickD. Z.TuholskiS. W.WilhelmO.PayneT.W.EngleR. W. (2004). The generality of working memory capacity: A latent-variable approach to verbal and visuospatial memory span and reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 189–217.
38.
KanisH. (1993). Usage centred research for everyday product design. Applied Ergonomics, 29, 75–82.
39.
KanisH.WeegelsM. F.SteenbekkersL. P. A. (1999). The uninformativeness of quantitative research for usability focused design of consumer products. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 43rd Annual Meeting (pp. 481–485). Santa Monica, CA: SAGE Publications.
40.
KiraA. (1976). The bathroom. New York: Viking.
41.
KirwanB.AinsworthL. K. (Eds.) (1993). A guide to task analysis. London: Taylor & Francis.
42.
KochanekK. D.MurphyS. L.AndersonR. N.ScottC. (2004). Deaths: Final data for 2002. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.
43.
KohnJ. P. (1999). Workstations, tools, equipment, and the workplace environment. In KohnJ. P. (Ed.), Ergonomic process management: A blueprint for quality and compliance (pp. 67–83). Boca Raton, FL: Lewis.
44.
KondoH.OsakaN. (2004). Susceptibility of spatial and verbal working memory to demands of the central executive. Japanese Psychological Research, 46(2), 86–97.
45.
KroemerK. H. E.KroemerH. B.Kroemer-ElbertK. E. (1994). Ergonomics: How to design for ease and efficiency. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
46.
KwahkJ. Y.HanS. H. (2002). A methodology for evaluating the usability of audiovisual consumer electronic products. Applied Ergonomics, 33, 419–431.
47.
LernerN. D.HueyR. W.MeiersC. (2002). Human factors considerations for high chair and stroller child restraints. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 46th Annual Meeting (pp. 710–714). Santa Monica, CA: SAGE Publications.
48.
LimR. W.WogalterM. S. (2002). Human factors design considerations of alarm clocks. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 46th Annual Meeting (pp. 705–709). Santa Monica, CA: SAGE Publications.
49.
LinJ.-H.RadwinR. G.RichardT. G. (2003). Handle dynamics predictions for selected power tool applications. Human Factors, 45, 645–656.
50.
LinR. T.KreifeldtJ. G. (2001). Ergonomics in wearable computer design. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 27, 259–269.
51.
LovettM. C.DailyL. Z.RederL. M. (2000). A source activation theory of working memory: Cross-task prediction of performance in ACT-R. Journal of Cognitive Systems Research, 1, 99–118.
52.
LovettM. C.RederL. M.LebiereC. (1999). Modeling working memory in a unified architecture: An ACT-R perspective. In MiyakeA.ShahP. (Eds.), Models of working memory (pp. 135–182). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
53.
MakiB. E. E.BartlettS. A.FernieG. R. (1985). Effect of stairway pitch on optimal handrail height. Human Factors, 27, 355–359.
54.
MarcusA. (2003). The emotion commotion. Interactions, 10(6), 28–34.
55.
MartelA. (1998). Application of ergonomics and consumer feedback to product design at Whirlpool. In StantonN. (Ed.), Human factors in consumer products (pp. 107–126). London: Taylor & Francis.
56.
MaslowA. (1970). Motivation and personality (2nd ed.). New York: Harper and Row.
57.
McMullinD.CaplanS. (2004). Third Annual Use-Centered Product Design Award. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 48th Annual Meeting (pp. 1004–1005). Santa Monica, CA: SAGE Publications.
58.
MedSun. (2005). MedSun: Playing a vital role in ensuring medical device safety. Retrieved October 20, 2005, from https://www.medsun.net/about.html.
59.
MeisterD.EnderwickT. P. (2001). Human factors in system design, development, and testing. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
60.
MillerH.BichselJ. (2004). Anxiety, working memory, gender, and math performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 591–606.
61.
MIL-STD 1472F. (1999). Department of Defense design criteria standard. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Defense.
62.
NagamachiM. (1995). Kansei engineering: A new ergonomic consumer-oriented technology for product development. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 15(1), 3–11.
63.
NagamachiM. (2002). Kansei engineering as a powerful consumer-oriented technology for product development. Applied Ergonomics, 33, 289–294.
NormanD. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. New York: Basic Books.
66.
NormanD. (2004). Emotional design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things. New York: Basic Books.
67.
NorrisB.WilsonJ. R. (1999). Ergonomics and safety in consumer product design. In GreenW. S.JordanP. W. (Eds.), Human factors in product design: Current practice and future trends (pp. 73–84). London: Taylor & Francis.
68.
NosackaS.GumpenbergerR.KubitM.TranB. (2002). Band saw safety system. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 46th Annual Meeting (pp. 715–719). Santa Monica, CA: SAGE Publications.
69.
OborneD. J. (1987). Ergonomics at work (2nd ed.). Chichester, England: Wiley.
70.
PaceS. (2001). Aids to innovation in the design and manufacture of hand-held consumer products. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 118, 261–268.
71.
ParkS. J.LeeH. J. (2002). The relationship between sleep quality and mattress types. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 46th Annual Meeting (pp. 745–749). Santa Monica, CA: SAGE Publications.
72.
ParkS. J.LeeH. J. (2003). Development of selection system of comfort pillow. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomic Society 47th Annual Meeting (pp. 816–820). Santa Monica, CA: SAGE Publications.
73.
ParkS. J.LeeH. J.HongK. H.KimJ. T. (2001). Evaluation of mattress for the Koreans. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 45th Annual Meeting (pp. 727–730). Santa Monica, CA: SAGE Publications.
74.
PaulsJ. (1984). Stair safety: Review of research. In Proceedings of the 1984 International Conference on Occupational Ergonomics (pp. 171–180). Mississauga, Canada: Human Factors Association of Canada.
75.
PearsonD. (2004). Individual differences and visuo-spatial working memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 779–781.
76.
PhillipsC.BadlerN. I. (1988, October). Jack: A toolkit for manipulating articulated figures. In Proceedings of the 1st SIGGRAPH Symposium on User Interface Software (pp. 221–229). New York: ACM Press.
77.
RayR. D.RayW. D. (1979). An analysis of domestic cooker control design. Ergonomics, 22, 1243–1248.
78.
ResnickM. (1999). User models of consumer products: The initial encounter. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 43rd Annual Meeting (471–475). Santa Monica, CA: SAGE Publications.
79.
RoodenM. J.GreenW. S.KanisH. (1999). Difficulties in usage of a coffeemaker predicted on the basis of design models. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 43rd Annual Meeting (pp. 476–480). Santa Monica, CA: SAGE Publications.
80.
RussoB.DeMoraesA. (2003). The usability of iconic designs: A case study of Juicy Salif. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 47th Annual Meeting (pp. 844–847). Santa Monica, CA: SAGE Publications.
81.
RussoP.BoorS. (1993). How fluent is your interface? Designing for international users. In Human Factors in Computing Systems, Proceedings INTERCHI ′93 (pp. 342–347). New York: ACM Press.
82.
SandersM. S.McCormickE. J. (1987). Human factors in engineering and design (6th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
83.
SauerJ.RuttingerB. (2004). Environmental conservation in the domestic domain: The influence of technical design features and person-based factors. Ergonomics, 47, 1053–1072.
84.
ScharineA. A.McBeathM. K. (2002). Right-handers and Americans favor turning to the right. Human Factors, 44, 248–256.
85.
SchmidtK. E.HossoyI. (2004). User-centered design of a wall clock. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 48th Annual Meeting (pp. 966–970). Santa Monica, CA: SAGE Publications.
ShinarD.ActonM. B. (1978). Control-display relationships on the four-burner range: Population stereotypes versus standards. Human Factors, 20, 13–17.
88.
ShinyaA.KohH.KumataT.MatsunobeT.YamaokaT.ShimosakoK., et al. (2004). In-situ ergonomics: A proposal of product operation information gathering method for ubiquitous computing environment. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 48th Annual Meeting (pp. 2489–2493). Santa Monica, CA: SAGE Publications.
89.
SissellK. (2004). Report warns of dangers from consumer products. Chemical Week, 166 (24), 39.
90.
StantonN. (1998). Product design with people in mind. In StantonN. (Ed.), Human factors in consumer products (pp. 1–17). London: Taylor & Francis.
91.
StantonN.YoungM. (1998). Ergonomics methods in consumer product and design. In StantonN. (Ed.), Human factors in consumer products (pp. 21–53). London: Taylor & Francis.
92.
StantonN. A.YoungM. S. (1999). A guide to methodology in ergonomics. London: Taylor & Francis.
93.
SteinemannA. (2004). Human exposure, health hazards, and environmental regulations. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 24, 695–710.
94.
TaylorA. J.RobertsP. H.HallM. J. D. (1999). Understanding person product relationships: A design perspective. In GreenW. S.JordanP. W. (Eds.), Human factors in product design: Current practice and future trends (pp. 21–228). London: Taylor & Francis.
95.
TeagueR. C.WhitneyH. X. (2002, Winter). What's love got to do with it? Why emotions and aspirations matter in person-centered design. User Experience, 6–13.
VanhammeJ.SneldersD. (2003). What if you surprise your customers … will they be more satisfied? Findings from a pilot experiment. Advances in Consumer Research, 30, 48.
100.
WendelP.HodgsonP. (2003). Revealing mental models of a cooking process through use of a hidden moderator: A case study. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 47th Annual Meeting (pp. 801–805). Santa Monica, CA: SAGE Publications.
101.
WoodsonW. E.TillmanB.TillmanP. (1992). Human factors design handbook Information and guidelines for the design of systems, facilities, equipment, and products for human use (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
102.
YouH.RyuT. (2004). Development of a hierarchical estimation method for anthropometric variables. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 48th Annual Meeting (pp. 961–965). Santa Monica, CA: SAGE Publications.
103.
YunM. H.HanS. H.HongS. W.KimJ. (2003). Incorporating user satisfaction into the look-and-feel of mobile phone design. Ergonomics, 46, 423–1440.
104.
ZabcikDa. (1981). Anthropometric design of a personal hygiene center. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 25th Annual Meeting (pp. 488–491). Santa Monica, CA: SAGE Publications.
105.
ZhangL. (2002). Quantifying customer perception of product harmony using Kansei engineering method. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 46th Annual Meeting (pp. 720–724). Santa Monica, CA: SAGE Publications.
