We conducted two studies that investigated display characteristics related to color (hue, saturation, brightness, and transparency) and contrast with a background for displaying information qualifiers (termed meta-information) such as uncertainty, age, and source quality. Level of detail (or granularity) of the meta-information and task demands were also manipulated. Participants were asked to rank and rate colored regions overlaid on different map backgrounds based on the level of meta-information the regions displayed. Results from Study 1 indicated that participants could appropriately rank and rate levels of meta-information across saturation, brightness, and transparency conditions, and results from Study 1 and Study 2 showed that the natural direction of ordering is complex and dependent on the relevance of different information to the task and the contrast of the overlay region with the background.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AertsJ. C. J. H.ClarkeK. C.KeuperA. D. (2003). Testing popular visualization techniques for representing model uncertainty. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 30, 249–261.
2.
AignerW.MikschS.ThurnherB.BifflS. (2005). PlanningLines: Novel glyphs for representing temporal uncertainties and their evaluation. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Information Visualisation (pp. 57–63). Piscataway, NJ: Institute of Electrical & Electronics Engineers.
3.
BennettK. B.NagyA. C.FlachJ. M. (1987). Visual displays. In SalvendyG. (Ed.), Handbook of human factors (pp. 659–696). New York: Wiley.
4.
BerlinB.KayP. (1969). Basic color terms: Their universality and evolution. Berkeley: University of California Press.
5.
BisantzA. M.MarsiglioS.MunchJ. L. (2005). The effects of format and level of specificity for displaying uncertainty. Human Factors, 47, 777–798.
6.
BotchenR. P.WeiskopfD.ErtlT. (2005). Texture-based visualization of uncertainty in flow fields. In Proceedings of IEEE Visualization 2005. Piscataway, NJ: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
7.
BrownR. (2004). Animated visual vibrations as an uncertainty visualisation technique. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques in Australasia and South East Asia (pp. 84–89). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
8.
BudescuD. V.WeinbergS.WallstenT. S. (1988). Decisions based on numerically and verbally expressed uncertainties. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 281–294.
9.
ButtenfieldB. P.WeibelR. (1988). Visualizing the quality of cartographic data. Paper presented at the Third International Geographic Information Systems Symposium (GIS/LIS 88), San Antonio, Texas.
10.
DreckiI. (2002). Visualisation of uncertainty in geographical data. In ShiW.FisherP.GoodchildM. (Eds.), Spatial data quality (pp. 140–159). London: Taylor & Francis.
11.
EhlschlaegerC. R.ShortridgeA. M.GoodchildM. F. (1997). Visualizing spatial data uncertainty using animation. Computers and Geosciences, 23, 387–395.
12.
EndsleyM. (2003, August). Supporting assessments of uncertainty in complex worlds. Paper presented at the XVth International Ergonomics Association Triennial Congress, Seoul, South Korea.
13.
EvansB. J. (1997). Dynamic display of spatial data-reliability: Does it benefit the map user? Computers and Geosciences, 23, 409–422.
14.
FingerR.BisantzA. M. (2002). Utilizing graphical formats to convey uncertainty in a decision making task. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 3, 1–25.
15.
FoleyJ. D.van DamA.FeinerS. K.HughesJ. F. (1995). Computer graphics: Principles and practice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
16.
GershonN. (1998). Visualization of an imperfect world. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 19(4), 43–45.
17.
GlassnerA. (1995). Principles of digital image synthesis. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
18.
HenglT. (2003). Visualisation of uncertainty using the HIS colour model: Computations with colours. In MartinD. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on GeoComputation (pp. 8–17). Southampton, UK: University of Southampton.
19.
HeringE. (1964). Outlines of a theory of the light sense. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20.
HowardD.MacEachrenA. M. (1996). Interface design for geographic visualization: Tools for representing reliability. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 23, 59–77.
21.
InterranteV. (2000). Harnessing natural textures for multivariate visualization. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 20(6), 6–11.
22.
KhangB.ZaidiQ. (2002). Cues and strategies for color constancy: Perceptual scission, image junctions, and transformational color matching. Vision Research, 42, 211–226.
23.
MacAdamD. (1942). Visual sensitivities to color differences in daylight. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 32, 247–274.
24.
MacEachrenA. M. (1992). Visualizing uncertain information. Cartographic Perspective, 13, 10–19.
25.
MacEachrenA. M.RobinsonA.HopperS.GardnerS.MurrayR.GaheganM., et al. (2005). Visualizing geospatial information uncertainty: What we know and what we need to know. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 32, 139–160.
26.
Munsell Color Company. (1976). Book of color. Baltimore: Author.
27.
Nadav-GreenbergL.JoslynS. L.TaingM. U. (2008). The effect of uncertainty visualizations on decision making in weather forecasting. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 2, 24–27.
28.
PangA. T.WittenbrinkC. M.LodhaS. K. (1997). Approaches to uncertainty visualization. Visual Computing, 13, 370–390.
29.
PfautzJ.FouseA.ShusterK.BisantzA.RothE. (2005). Meta-information visualization in geographic information display systems. In Digest of Technical Papers—SID International Symposium (Vol. 36, pp. 1406–1409). San Jose, CA: Society for Information Display.
30.
PfeifferJ. J. (2002). Using brightness and saturation to visualize belief and uncertainty. In HegartyM.MeyerB.NarayananN. H. (Eds.), Diagrams 2002 (pp. 272–289). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
31.
PostD.GreeneF. (1986). Color name boundaries for equally bright stimuli on a CRT. In Proceedings of the Society for Information Display, Digest of Technical Papers (pp. 70–73). San Jose, CA: Society for Information Display.
32.
RosenholtzR.NagyA.BellN. (2004). The effect of background color on asymmetries in color search. Journal of Vision, 4, 224–240.
33.
SchaeferD.GizdavuA.NichollsD. (2004). The display of uncertainty information on the controller working position. In Proceedings of the 23rd Digital Avionics Systems Conference (pp. 51–61). Piscataway, NJ: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
34.
SchmidtG. S.ChenS. L.BrydenA. N.LivingstonM. A.RosenblumL. J.OsbornB. R. (2004). Multidimensional visual representations for underwater environmental uncertainty. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 24(5), 56–65.
35.
SlocumT. A.CliburnD. C.FeddemaJ. J.MillerJ. R. (2003). Evaluating the usability of a tool for visualizing the uncertainty of the future global water balance. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 30, 299–317.
36.
UrnessT.InterranteV.MarusicI.LongmireE.GanapathisubramaniB. (2003). Effectively visualizing multi-valued flow data using color and texture. In Proceedings of the 14th IEEE Visualization Conference (VIS′03; pp. 115–121). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Computer Society.
37.
WallstenT. S.BudescuD. V. (1995). A review of human linguistic probability processing: General principles and empirical evidence. Knowledge Engineering Review, 10, 43–62.
38.
WareC. (2004). Information visualization: Perception for design. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
39.
WittenbrinkC. M.PangA. T.LodhaS. K. (1996). Glyphs for visualizing uncertainty in vector fields. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 2, 266–279.
40.
WyszeckiG.StilesW. S. (1982). Color science: Concepts and methods, quantitative data and formulae (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
