The paper describes the human views for the UK Ministry of Defence Architectural Framework (MODAF) as essential concepts to enable a common modeling approach between the fields of systems engineering and human factors integration. Human views express high-level human factors design decisions through a systems engineering modeling approach to better communicate human-related design concerns to engineers and to enable early application of human factors methods in the systems engineering process. Integration barriers attributable to differing approaches between human factors integration and systems engineering are outlined. Cognitive systems engineering is considered under the umbrella of human factors integration. The paper discusses how selected cognitive systems engineering approaches and methods provide an invaluable resource in supporting the underlying philosophy and application of the human views as part of MODAF.
ChamberlainS. (1999, June-July). Default operational representations of military organizations for joint and coalition operations. Paper presented at the Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium, Newport, RI. Retrieved from http://www.dodccrp.org/events/1999_CCRTS/pdf_files/track_5/056chamb.pdf.
3.
HandleyH. A. H.SorberT. J.DunawayJ. D. (2006, September). Maritime Headquarters with Maritime Operations Center. Concept based assessment. Focus area: Organization (Final Report). San Diego, CA: Pacific Science & Engineering Group.
4.
HandleyH. A. H.ZaidiZ. R.LevisA. H. (1999). The use of simulation models in model driven experimentation. Systems Engineering, 2(2), 108–128.
5.
HicksP. (2006, November). Application of an architecture framework to support the development of CVF. Presentation given at the Telelogic User Conference, Newport, UK.
6.
HollnagelE.WoodsD. (2005). Joint cognitive systems: Patterns in cognitive systems engineering. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
HutchinsE. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9.
International Federation for Information Processing-International Federation of Automatic Control (IFIP-IFAC) Task Force on Architectures for Enterprise Integration. (1999, March). GERAM: Generalised enterprise reference architecture and methodology, Version 1.6.3. Retrieved September 12, 2008, from http://www.cit.gu.edu.au/∼bernus/taskforce/geram/versions/geram1-6-3/v1.6.3.html.
10.
MillsM. (2006, April). System design or social change. Presented at the Parliamentary Information Technology Committee (PITCOM) meeting on usability of ICT systems, London. Retrieved September 15, 2008 from http://www.pitcom.org.uk/reports/Malcolm-Mills-talk.doc.
11.
NaikarN.PearceB.DrummD.SandersonP. M. (2003). Designing teams for first-of-a-kind, complex systems using the initial phases of cognitive work analysis: A case study. Human Factors, 45, 202–217.
12.
RasmussenJ.PejtersenA. M.GoodsteinL. P. (1994). Cognitive systems engineering. New York: Wiley.
U.S. Department of Defense. (2004, February). DoD Architecture Framework version 1.0: Volume 2: Product descriptions. Department of Defense Architecture Framework Working Group. Retrieved December 15, 2006, from http://www.defenselink.mil/cio-nii/docs/DoDAF_Volume_II.pdf.
20.
VicenteK. (1999). Cognitive work analysis: Toward safe, productive, and healthy computer-based work. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
