Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Based on airline pilot surveys, industry committees and workshops, conducted on advanced technology “glass cockpit” airplanes, concerns have been raised about the application and long-term effects of automation technologies. It has been pointed out that purely technology-driven designs had resulted in unintended and unforeseen negative consequences. In order to counter this trend it has been proposed to shift the focus from technology-centered designs to what has become known as human-centered design. There are three primary objectives within a human-centered design philosophy: (1) the design should enhance the user's abilities, (2) the design should help overcome user limitations, and (3) the design should foster user acceptance. This paper discusses the human-centered design objectives within the context of commercial transport airplane developments. Representative examples of a human-centered design are presented.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Billings

C.E.

(1991). Human-Centered Aircraft Automation: A Concept and Guidelines. NASA Technical Memorandum 103885, Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035-1000.

Braune

R.J.

(1991). Minutes of the SAE's G10 subcommittee on automation. Daytona Beach, Florida.

Braune

R.J.

(1987). Summary of the Workshop on Cockpit Automation in Commercial Airplanes. Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Aviation Psychology. The Ohio State University.

Braune

R.J.

Fadden

D.M.

(1987). Flight deck automation today: Where do we go from here? In Proceedings of the SAE Aerotech 1987, Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers.

Curry

R.E.

(1985). The Introduction of New Cockpit Technology: A Human Factors Study. NASA TM 86659, Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035.

Fadden

D.M.

(1990). Aircraft Automation Challenges. In Abstracts of AIAA/NASA/FAA/HFS Symposium, Challenges in Aviation Human Factors: The National Plan. Washington, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.

Foushee

(1989). National Plan to Enhance Aviation Safety through Human Factors Improvements. NASA CP-3090.

Graeber

R.C.

(1992). Defining 21st Century Transport Flight Decks: Revolution or Evolution? Presented to the Guild of Airline Pilots and Air Navigators at the Royal Aeronautical Society, London, England, April 14.

McClumpha

A.J.

James

Green

R.G.

Belyavin

A.J.

(1991). Pilot's Attitudes to Cockpit Automation. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 35th Annual Meeting. San Francisco, CA.

10.

Morton

P.M.

(1982). The 757/767 Engine Indication and Crew Alerting System, its History, Philosophy, and Future. Presentation to The Royal Aeronautical Society-London Airport Branch, September 16.

11.

Norman

S.D.

Orlady

H.W.

(1988). Flight Deck Automation: Promises and Realities. Final Report of a NASA/FAA/Industry Workshop. Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035.

12.

Rouse

W.B.

(1991). Design for Success: A human-centered approach to designing successful products and systems. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.

13.

Wickens

C.D.

(1992). Engineering Psychology and Human Performance. HarperCollins, New York.

14.

Wiener

E.L.

Curry

R.E.

(1980). Flight-deck automation: Promises and problems. Ergonomics, Vol. 23, No.10, 995–1011.

15.

Wiener

E.L.

(1989). Human Factors of Advanced Technology (“Glass Cockpit”) Transport Aircraft., NASA CR 177528, Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035.

16.

Wiener

E.L.

Chidester

T.R.

Kanki

B.G.

Palmer

E.A.

Curry

R.E.

Gregorich

S.E.

(1991). The Impact of Cockpit Automation on Crew Coordination and Communication: I. Overview, LOFT Evaluations, Error Severity, and Questionnaire Data. NASA CR 177587, Ames Research Center, Moffett Field.

Human-Centered Designs in Commercial Transport Aircraft

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References