Reclined Seating in Advanced Crewstations: Human Performance Considerations

Abstract

The present study investigated operator performance based on sensory and cognitive task performance measures obtained during high G in both an upright seat (27 degrees of reclination) and a reclined seat (67 degrees of reclination). Subjects were required to perform both a perceptual/motor and a classification task under varying levels of G. Results indicated that there were little differences in reaction times or accuracy between seat configurations for single task cognitive performance. There were significant differences in reaction times for seat types for dual task cognitive performance. In general, tracking performance on the upright seat was better than the reclined seat during G, while the reclined seat seemed to show substantial performance recovery post-G. The possibility that tracking results favoring the upright seat may not be a function of true perceptual/motor advantages, but rather engineering design problems inherent in the reclined seat were discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Burns

J.W.

(1975). Re-evaluation of a tilt-back seat as a means of increasing acceleration tolerance. Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine, 46(1), 55–63.

Crossley

R.J.

Glaister

D.H.

(1971). Effect of posture on tolerance to positive acceleration. In Adaptation and acclimatization in aerospace medicine. AGARD-CP-82–71, Advisory Group for Research and Development, North Atlantic Treaty Organization, pp. 6–1 to 6–6.

Deaton

J.E.

Holmes

Warner

Hitchcock

(1990). The development of perceptual/motor and cognitive performance measures under a high G environment: A preliminary study. Technical Report (NADC-90065–60), Naval Air Development Center, Warminster, PA.

Lisher

B.J.

Glaister

D.H.

(1978). The effect of acceleration and seat back angle on performance of a reaction time task. FPRC Report No. 1364 Flying Personnel Research Committee, Ministry of Defence (Air Force Department), London.

Smiles

(1972). Human performance capability in the aircraft acceleration environment of aerial combat. Technical Report (AMRL-TR-72–60), Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH.