The term warning is applied to a variety of stimuli. From a safety standpoint, the most appropriate definition of warning ties it to any information that has the potential to change behavior and prevent accidents. The results of an extensive literature review suggest that warnings are unlikely to be effective unless a series of conditions are met. The failure of many intended warnings, including most on-product warning labels, to reduce accidents reflects the difficulty of overcoming the problems inherent in their use.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ANSI Z535.Product Safety Signs and Labels. American National Standards Institute, Draft January 1987.
2.
AronsonE.TurnerJ. A.CarlsmithJ. M. (1963). Communicator credibility and communication discrepancy as determinants of opinion change. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67 (1), 31–36.
3.
BradstockM. K.MarksJ. S.FormanM. R.GentryE. M.HogelinG. C.BinkinN. J.TrowbridgeF. L. (1987). Drinking-driving and health lifestyle in the United States: Behavioral risk factors surveys. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 48 (2), 147–152.
4.
CronbachL. J. (1975). Beyond the two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 30, 116–127.
5.
Culver-DickinsonP.VernbergD. D.SpykerD. A. (1982). The deterrent value of “Mr. Yuk” stickers. International Congress of Clinical Toxicology.
6.
DesaulniersD. R. (1987). Layout, organization, and the effectiveness of consumer product warnings. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society, 56–60.
7.
deTurckM. A.GoldhaberG. M. (1988). Consumers' information processing objectives and effects of product warnings. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society, 445–449.
8.
DorrisA. L.PurswellJ. L. (1977). Warnings and human behavior: Implications for the design of product warnings. Journal of Products Liability, 1, 255–264.
9.
DriverR. W. (1987). A communication model for determining the appropriateness of on-product warnings. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, PC30 (3), 157–163.
10.
DuchonJ. C.LaageL. W. (1986). The consideration of human factors in the design of a backing-up warning system. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society, 261–264.
11.
FriedmannK. (1988). The effect of adding symbols to written warning labels on user behavior and recall. Human Factors, 30 (4), 507–515.
12.
GillR. T.BarberaC.PrechtT. (1987). A comparative evaluation of warning label design. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society, 476–478.
13.
GodfreyS. S.RothsteinP. R.LaugheryK. P. (1985). Warnings: Do they make a difference?Proceedings of the Human Factors Society, 669–673.
14.
GoldhaberG. M.deTurckM. A.Effectiveness of warning signs: Gender and familiarity effects. Manuscript.
15.
HorstD. PMcCarthyG. E.RobinsonJ. N.McCarthyR. L.Krumm-ScottS. (1986). Safety information presentation: Factors influencing the potential for changing behavior. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society, 111–115.
16.
HovlandC. I.WeissW. (1951). The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15, 635–650.
17.
KeinanG. (1987). Decision making under stress: Scanning of alternatives under controllable and uncontrollable threats. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52 (3), 639–644.
18.
LanerS.SellR. G. (1960). An experiment on the effect of specially designed safety posters. Occupational Psychology, 34(3), 153–169.
19.
LangerE.BlankA.ChanowitzB. (1978). The mindlessness of ostensibly thoughtful action: The role of “placebic” information in interpersonal interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36 (6), 635–642.
20.
LehtoM. R.MillerJ. M. (1986). Warnings Volume 1. Fundamentals, Design, and Evaluation Methodologies.Ann Arbor, MI: Fuller Technical Publications.
21.
McCarthyR. L.FinneganJ. P.Krumm-ScottS.McCarthyG. E. (1984a). Product information presentation, user behavior, and safety. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society, 81–85.
22.
McCarthyR. L.TaylorR. K.SanfordS. B.LangeR. C. (1984b). Seat belts: Effectiveness of mandatory use requirements. SAE Technical Paper Series, No. 840329.
23.
McCarthyG. E.HorstD. P.BeyerR. R.RobinsonJ. N.McCarthyR. L. (1987). Measured impact of a mandated warning on user behavior. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society, 479–483.
24.
McGuireW. J. (1981). Theoretical foundations of campaigns. In RiceR. E.PaisleyW. J. (Eds.), Public Communication Campaigns.Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
25.
NikmoradH. (1985). A study of behavioral responses in regard to the warning labels on consumer products. Unpublished master thesis, University of Oklahoma.
26.
OtsuboS. M. (1988). A behavioral study of warning labels for consumer products: Perceived danger and use of pictographs. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society, 536–540.
27.
PennebakerJ. W.SandersD. Y. (1976). American graffiti: Effects of authority and reactance arousal. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2 (3), 264–267.
28.
PolusA. (1985). Driver behavior and accident records at unsignalized urban intersections. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 17 (1), 25–32.
29.
PurswellJ. L.SchlegelR. E.KejriwalS. K. (1986). A prediction model for consumer behavior regarding product safety. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society, 1202–1205.
30.
ReasonJ.MycielskaK. (1982). Absent-Minded?The Psychology of Mental Lapses and Everyday Errors.New York: Prentice-Hall.
31.
SchneiderK. C. (1977). Prevention of accidental poisoning through package and label design. Journal of Consumer Research, 4, 67–74.
32.
SlovicP.FischoffB.LichtensteinS. (1980). Facts and fears: Understanding perceived risk. In SchwingR. C.AlbersW. A., Societal Risk Assessment: How Safe is Safe Enough?New York: Plenum Press.
33.
SternG. S.BlythD. P.KreyeM. W.CoonsC. E. (1975). Perceived aversiveness of recommended solution and locus of control as determinants of response to danger. Journal of Research in Personality, 9, 37–47.
34.
StocktonW. R.BrackettR. O.MounceJ. M. (1981). Stop, Yield, and No Control at Intersections. Federal Highway Administration, Report No. FHWA-RD-81/084.
35.
StrawbridgeJ. A. (1986). The influence of position, highlighting, and imbedding on warning effectiveness. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society, 716–720.
36.
von BuseckC.EvansL.SchmidtD.WasielewskiP. (1980). Seat belt usage and risk taking in driving behavior. Presented at the Society of Automotive Engineers Congress.
37.
WeinsteinN. D. (1984). Why it won't happen to me: Perceptions of risk factors and susceptibility. Health Psychology, 3 (5), 431–457.
38.
WogalterM. S.GodfreyS. S.FontenelleG. A.DesaulniersD. R.RothsteinP. R.LaugheryK. R. (1987). Human Factors, 29 (5), 599–612.
39.
WogalterM. S.AllisonS. T.McKennaN. A. (1989). Effects of cost and social influence on warning compliance. Human Factors, 31 (2), 133–140.
40.
WrightP. (1979). Concrete action plans in TV messages to increase reading of drug warnings. Journal of Consumer Research, 6, 256–269.
41.
ZlotnikM. A. (1982). The effects of warning message highlighting on novel assembly task performance. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society.93–97.
42.
ZuckermanM.EysenckS.EysenckH. J. (1978). Sensation seeking in England and America: Cross-cultural, age, and sex comparisons. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46 (1), 139–149.
