This paper provides a review and evaluation of the Techniques currently used in the measurement of human and robot performances. Furthermore, a strategic model is presented which may assist job designers in the selection process between humans and robots.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BollesR.PaulR., 1973. The Use of Sensory Feedback in a Programmable assembly System. Memo AIM-220, Stanford Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, California, U.S.A.
2.
GenaidyA. M.MitalA.ObeidatM.PuppalaM., 1988. The Validity of Predetermined Motion Time Systems for Manual Materials Handling. In: AghazadehF., Trends in Ergonomics/Human Factors V, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam.
3.
GenaidyA. M.DuggalJ. S.MitalA., 1988. A Comparison of Human and Robot Performances for Simple Assembly Tasks. Submitted for Publication.
4.
MaynardH.StegmertenG.SchwabJ., 1948. Methods Time Measurement.New York, McGraw Hill.
5.
NofS. Y.KnightJ. L.SalvendyG., 1980. Effective Utilization of Industrial Robots — A Job and Skills Analysis Approach. AIIB Transactions, 12 (3): 216–225.
6.
PaulR. P.NofS. Y., 1979. Work Methods Measurement - A Comparison Between Robot and Human Task Performance. International Journal of Production Research, 17 (3): 277–303.
7.
WygantR. M., 1986. Robots vs Humans in Performing Industrial Tasks: A Comparison of Capabilities and Limitations. Unpublished Ph. D. Dissertation, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, U.S.A.
8.
ZandinK. B., 1980. MOST Work Measurement Systems.Marcel Dekker, New York, U.S.A.
