Two studies were undertaken to obtain empirical support for the existence of driver subtypes in the young novice driver population. In Study 1, 198 participants (55% male) aged 16 to 19 completed an extensive self-report questionnaire. Five novice driver subtypes were identified through a cluster analysis of personality and driving-related measures. Two relatively high-risk or deviant subtypes (Clusters 1 and 5) were identified, characterized by high levels of driving-related aggression, competitive speed, driving to reduce tension, sensation seeking, assaultiveness, and hostility. The individuals in Cluster 5 also reported low levels of emotional adjustment and high levels of depression, resentfulness, and irritability. In Study 2, a subset of participants from each of the subtypes drove several scenarios in a driving simulator. The subtypes differed in their responses to an emergency situation and several potential traffic hazards. They also differed in the proficiency with which they could control their attention among concurrent tasks in high workload situations. Most of the significant differences were related to lower levels of driving skill among the two most deviant subtypes (Clusters 1 and 5). The potential applications of this research include the design of training programs and other countermeasures to address the young novice driver crash problem.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Blank, D., & McCord, R. (1988). Design and presentation of a CD-ROM driving program (Driver-ZED). In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 42nd Annual Meeting (pp. 1401–1402). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
2.
Blashfield, R. K. (1980). Propositions regarding the use of cluster analysis in clinical research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 48, 456–459.
3.
Bottom, C. G., & Ashworth, R. (1978). Factors affecting the variability of driver gap acceptance behavior. Ergonomics, 21, 721–734.
4.
Buss, A. H., & Durkee, A. (1957). An inventory for assessing different kinds of hostility. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 21, 343–349.
5.
Cahalan, D., Casin, I. H., & Crossley, H. M. (1969). American drinking practices. A national study of drinking behavior and attitudes (Monograph No. 6). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Center of Alcohol Studies.
6.
Catchpole, J. (1997). An investigation of factors contributing to the overrepresentation of young drivers in traffic accidents. Unpublished master's thesis, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
7.
Costello, C. G., & Comrey, A. L. (1967). Scales for measuring depression and anxiety. Journal of Psychology, 66, 303–313.
8.
Deery, H. A., & Love, A. W. (1996a). The driving expectancy questionnaire: Development, psychometric assessment and predictive utility among young drunk-drivers. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 57, 193–202.
9.
Deery, H. A., & Love, A. W. (1996b). The effect of a moderate dose of alcohol on the traffic hazard perception profile of young drivers. Addiction, 91, 815–827.
10.
Deery, H. A., Wilson, N., & Triggs, T. J. (1997). Young drivers' perception of risk in traffic hazards: Implications for simulatorbased training. Australian Journal of Psychology, 49 (Suppl.1), 8.
11.
Donovan, D. M., & Marlatt, G. A. (1982). Personality subtypes among driving-while-intoxicated offenders: Relationship to drinking behavior and driving risk. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50, 241–249.
12.
Donovan, D. M., Umlauf, R. L., & Salzberg, P. M. (1988). Derivation of personality subtypes among high-risk drivers. Alcohol, Drugs and Driving, 4, 233-234.
13.
Elander, J., West, R., & French, D. (1993). Behavioral correlates of individual differences in road-traffic crash risk: An examination of methods and findings. Psychological Bulletin113, 279-294.
14.
Evans, L., & Wasielewski, P. (1983). Risky driving related to driver and vehicle characteristics. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 15, 121-136.
15.
Fischer, D. L., Glaser, R., Laurie, N. E., & Pollatsek, A. (1998). Evaluation of PC-based younger driver training program: Use of a driving simulator. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 42nd Annual Meeting (pp. 1403–1407). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
16.
Goldstein, L. G., & Mosel, J. N. (1958). A factor study of drivers' attitudes, with further study on driver aggression. Highway Research Board Bulletin, 172, 9–29.
17.
Howarth, E. A. (1976). A psychometric investigation of Eysenck's Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 40, 173–185.
18.
Jessor, R. (1987). Risky driving and adolescent problem behavior: Theoretical and empirical linkages. In T. Benjamin (Ed.), International Congress and Symposium Series: No. 116. Young drivers impaired by alcohol and other drugs (pp. 97–110). New York: Royal Society of Medicine Services.
19.
Kaufman, L., & Rousseuw, P. J. (1990). Finding groups in data: An introduction to cluster analysis.New York: Wiley.
20.
Koneci, C., Ebbesen, E. B., & Koneci, D. K. (1976). Decision processes and risk taking in traffic: Driver response to the onset of yellow light. Journal of Applied Psychology, 6, 359–367.
21.
Macdonald, W. (1994). Young driver research program: A review of information on young driver crashes (Report CR 128). Canberra, Australia: Federal Office of Road Safety.
22.
Malfetti, J. L. (1993). A study of young driver insurance records: Opportunities for automobile insurers.Washington, DC: American Automobile Association Foundation for Traffic Safety.
23.
Mayhew, D. R., & Simpson, H. M. (1995). The role of driving experience: Implications for training and licensing of new drivers.Toronto, Canada: Insurance Bureau of Canada.
24.
McKenna, F. P., & Crick, J. (1997). Hazard perception in drivers: A methodology for testing and training (No. 297). Crowthorn, England: Transport Research Laboratory.
25.
McMillen, D. L., Pang, M. G., Wells-Parker, E., & Anderson, B. J. (1992). Alcohol, personality, and high risk driving: A comparison of young, drinking driver groups. Addictive Behaviors, 17, 525–532.
26.
Milligan, G. W., & Cooper, M. C. (1985). An examination of procedures for determining the number of clusters in a data set. Psychometrika, 50, 159–179.
27.
Quimby, A. R., Maycock, G., Carter, I. D., Dixon, R., & Wall, J. G. (1986). Perceptual abilities of accident involved drivers (Report 27). Crowthorne, England: Transport Research Laboratory.
28.
Rathus, S. A. (1973). A 30-item schedule for assessing assertive behaviour. Behaviour Therapy, 4, 398–406.
29.
Regan, M., Deery, H. A., & Triggs, T. J. (1998a). A technique for enhancing risk perception in novice car drivers. In Proceedings of the Road Safety Research, Policing, Education Conference (pp. 51–56). Wellington, New Zealand: Department of Transport.
30.
Regan, M., Deery, H. A., & Triggs, T. J. (1998b). Training for attentional control in novice car drivers: A simulator study. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 42nd Annual Meeting (pp. 1408–1413). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
31.
Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80, 1.
32.
Sarle, W. S. (1983). Cubic clustering criterion (Tech. Report A-108). Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
33.
Tabachnick, R. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1989). Using multivariate statistics (2nd ed.). New York: HarperCollins.
34.
Transport Canada. (1984). Canadian motor vehicle traffic accident statistics (Report TP3322). Ottawa, Canada: Road Safety Directorate.
35.
U. S. Department of Education. (1988). Youth indicators 1988: Trends in the well-being of American youth (DE Publication No. 065-000-00347-3). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
36.
U. S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. (1993). Addressing the safety issues related to younger and older drivers: A report to Congress, January 19, 1993, On the research agenda of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (DOT-HS-808-161). Washington, DC: Author.
37.
Wasielewski, P. (1984). Speed as a measure of driver risk: Observed speed versus driver and vehicle characteristics. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 16, 89–103.
38.
Wieczorek, W. F., & Miller, B. A. (1992). Preliminary typology designed for treatment matching of driving-while-intoxicated offenders. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60, 757–765.
39.
Wilson, R. J. (1991). Subtypes of DWIs and high-risk drivers: Implications for differential intervention. Alcohol, Drugs and Driving, 7, 1–12.
40.
Wilson, R. J., & Jonah, B. A. (1988). The application of problem behavior theory to the understanding of risky driving. Alcohol, Drugs and Driving, 4, 173–191.
41.
Zuckerman, M. (1971). Dimensions of sensation seeking. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 36, 45–52
