Target-Directed Head Movements in a Head-Coupled Virtual Environment: Predicting the Effects of Lags Using Fitts' Law

Abstract

Two experiments have investigated the effects of lag on discrete target-directed head movements in a virtual environment. Both the target and a head-slaved pointer (subjected to lag) were presented on a head-mounted display. Targetdirected head movements in the presence of a constant time lag were shown to obey Fitts' law (R² < .93). A previously reported interaction between the effects of lag and the effects of index-of-difficulty on hand movement time could not be found in head movement time when the target width was kept constant. Further experiments suggested that there is a significant interaction between the effects of target width and lag but not between target distance and lag. A model predicting head movement strategy in the presence of lag is proposed to explain the experimental findings. This model predicts, and experiments verified, that for a target width from 1° to 8° and a target distance range of 2.5° to 30° , the effect of lag (up to 267 ms) on target-directed head movement is independent of target distance but dependent on target width. Actual or potential applications of this research include the design of virtual control panel and its layout in a Virtual Reality simulator.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andres, R. O. , & Hartung, K. J. (1989). Prediction of head movement time using Fitts' law. Human Factors, 31, 703–713.

Barfield, W. , & Furness, T. A., III , (1995). Virtual environments and advanced interface design New York: Oxford University Press.

Barnes, W. J. (1989, March). Tactical applications of the helmetmounted display in fighter aircraft. Proceedings of the SPIE Conference on Helmet-Mounted Displays (pp.149–160). Bellingham, WA: The International Society for Optical Engineering.

Bayarri, S. , Fernandez, M. , & Perz, M. (1996). Virtual reality for driving simulation. Journal of Communications ACM, 39, 72–76.

Boff, K. R. , & Lincoln, J. E. (1988). Engineering data compendium: Human perception and performance Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH: Harry G. Armstrong Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory.

Eggleston, R. G. , & Janson, W. P. (1997). Field of view on a direct manipulation task in a virtual environment. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 44th Annual Meeting, pp. 1244–1249. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

Ferrell, W. R. (1965). Remote manipulation with transmission delay. IEEE Transactions on Human Factors in Electronics, HFE-6, 24–32.

Fitts, P. M. , & Peterson, J. R. (1964). Information capacity of discrete motor responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 103–112.

Fitts, P. M. , & Posner, M. I. (1967). Human performance Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.

10.

Hill, J. W. (1976). Comparison of seven performance measures in a time-delayed manipulation task. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-6, 286–295.

11.

Hoffmann, E. R. (1992). Fitts' law with transmission delay. Ergonomics, 35, 37–48.

12.

Jagacinski, R. J. , & Monk, D. L. (1985). Fitts' law in two dimensions with hand and head movements. Journal of Motor Behavior, 17, 77–95.

13.

Kalawsky, R. S. (1993). The science of virtual reality and virtual environments Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

14.

Lin, M. L. , Radwin, R. G. , & Vanderheiden, G. C. (1992). Gain effects on performance using a head-controlled computer input device. Ergonomics, 35, 159–179.

15.

MacKenzie, I. S. , & Ware, C. (1993, April). Lag as a determinant of human performance in interactive systems. In Proceedings of InterCHI1993 (pp. 488–493). Reading, MA: Association for Addison-Wesley.

16.

Pheasant, S. (1986). Bodyspace: Anthropometry, ergonomics, and design London: Taylor & Francis.

17.

Radwin, R. G. , Vanderheiden, G. C. , & Lin, M. L. (1990). A method for evaluating head-controlled computer input devices using Fitts' law. Human Factors, 32, 423–438.

18.

Rogers, S. P. , Spiker, V. A. , & Fischer, S. C. (1997, April). Effects of system lag on head-tracked cursor control. In Proceedings of the SPIE Conference on Head-Mounted Displays II, (pp. 14–23). Bellingham, WA: The International Society for Optical Engineering.

19.

Sheridan, T. B. , & Ferrell, W. R. (1963). Remote manipulative control with transmission delay. IEEE Transactions on Human Factors in Electronics, HFE-4, 25–29.

20.

Starr, G. P. (1979). A comparison of control modes for timedelayed remote manipulation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-9, 241–246.

21.

So, R. H. Y., & Griffin, M. J. (1993). Effect of lags on human performance with head-coupled simulators. Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH: Armstrong Laboratory. (NYIS Mo. AL/CFTR-1990-0101)

22.

So, R. H. Y. , & Griffin, M. J. (1995a). Tracking performance with a head-slaved pointing instrument with lags. In S. A. Robertson (Ed.), Contemporary ergonomics (pp. 74–79). London: Taylor & Francis.

23.

So, R. H. Y. , & Griffin, M. J. (1995b). Head-coupled virtual environment with display lag. In K. Carr & R. England (Eds.), Simulated and Virtual Realities: Elements of perception (pp. 103–112). London: Taylor & Francis.

24.

Wells, M. J. , & Griffin, M. J. (1987). A review and investigation of aiming and tracking performance with head-mounted sights. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-17, 210–221.