Three Studies Testing the Effects of Role Models on Product Users' Safety Behavior

Abstract

Three studies were conducted to determine the effect of a role model's safety behavior on observers' safety behavior. In Studies 1 and 2, role models (confederates) used a cleaning product requiring them to wear safety gloves. Study 1 examined observers' safety behavior after they witnessed a friendly (unfriendly) role model's safety behavior in one of four conditions: 1) wearing rubber gloves, 2) not wearing rubber gloves and experiencing no chemical burn, 3) not wearing rubber gloves and experiencing a mild chemical burn, and 4) not wearing rubber gloves and experiencing a severe chemical burn. In Study 2, participants tested a cleaning product with a warning message (low hazard vs. high hazard) after observing a role model first test the cleaning product in one of the four conditions specified above. As predicted, in Studies 1 and 2, observers were influenced by the role model's safety behavior. However, the friendliness of the role model (Study 1) and level of hazard (Study 2) communicated in the warning message did not influence participants' safety behavior. Using an over-thecounter pain reliever, Study 3 tested the joint effects of: 1) the level of hazard communicated in the warning, 2) observers' outcome-relevant involvement, and 3) role model's compliance. Although the level of hazard communicated in the warning exerted no impact on observers' safety compliance, the role model's safety behavior and level of involvement jointly influenced observers' safety behavior. The implications of the findings and future research directions are discussed. Actual or potential applications of the research include, but are not limited to, using role models in warning messages and safety training programs to demonstrate the proper use of safety gear so as to enhance product users' compliance with safety recommendations.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

Boster, F.J. , & Mongeau, P. (1984). Fear arousing persuasive messages. In R. Bostrom (Ed.), Communication yearbook (Vol. 8, pp.330–375). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.

Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 752–766.

Chaiken, S. (1987). The heuristic model of persuasion. In M.P. Zanna, J.M. Olson, & C.P. Herman (Eds.), The Ontario Symposium: Social influence (Vol. 5, pp 3--39). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. deTurck, M.A. (1995). Developing and defending product warning labels: A communication theory perspective. Product Safety and Liability Reporter, 23, 274–281.

deTurck, M.A. , & Goldhaber, G.M. (1989a). Effectiveness of product warning labels: Effects of consumers' information processing objectives. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 23, 111–126.

deTurck, M.A. , & Goldhaber, G.M. (1989b). Effectiveness of signal words in warnings: Effects of familiarity and gender. Journal of Products Liability, 12, 104–114.

deTurck, M.A. , Goldhaber, G.M. (1991). A developmental analysis of product warning effects: The case of gender and familiarity. Journal of Products Liability, 13, 65–78.

deTurck, M.A. , Goldhaber, G.M. , & Richetto, G.M. (1992). Effectiveness of warnings on alcoholic beverages: Consumers' information processing objectives and level of fear. Journal of Toxics and Products Liability, 14, 329–339.

deTurck, M.A. , & Goldhaber, G. M. , & Richetto, G. (1995). Effectiveness of alcohol beverage warning labels: Effects of consumer information processing objectives and color of signal word. Journal of Toxics and Products Liability, 17, 187–195.

10.

deTurck, M.A. , Goldhaber, G.M. , Richetto, G.M. , & Young, M.J. (1992). Effects of fear-arousing warning messages. Journal of Products Liability, 14, 217–223.

11.

deTurck, M.A. , Rachlin, R.A. , & Young, M.J. (1994). Effects of a role model and fear in warning label on perceptions of safety and safety behavior. Advances in Consumer Research, 21, 208–212.

12.

Dillard, J.P. (1995). Rethinking the study of fear appeals: An emotional perspective. Communication Theory, 4, 293–323.

13.

Hale, J.L. , & Dillard, J.P. (1995). Fear appeals in health promotion campaigns: Too much, too little, or just right. In E. Maibach & R. L. Parrott (Eds.), Desiging health messages: Approaches from communication theory and public health practice (pp. 65–80). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

14.

Johnson, B.T. , & Eagly, A.H. (1989). Effects of involvement on persuasion. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 290–313.

15.

Miller, J.M. , Lehto, M.R. , & Frantz, J.P. (1990). Instructions and warnings: The annotated bibliography Ann Arbor, Michigan: Fuller Technical Publications.

16.

Petty, R.E. , & Cacioppo, J.T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in experimental social psychology, 19, 123–205.

17.

Srull, T.K. (1984). Methodological techniques for the study of person memory and social cognition. In R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (Vol. 2, pp. 1–72). Hilldale, NJ: Erlbaum.

18.

Sternthal, B. , & Craig, C.S. (1974). Fear appeals: Revisited and revised. Journal of Consumer Research, 1, 22–34.

19.

Wogalter, M.S. , & Barlow, T. (1990). Injury severity and likelihood in warnings. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 34th Annual Meeting, 580–583.

20.

Wogalter, M.S. , Kalsher, M.J. , & Raciot, B.M. (1993). Behavioral compliance with warnings: Effects of voice, context, and location. Safety Science, 16, 637–654.

21.

Wogalter, M. S. , McKenna, N. A. , & Allison, S. T. (1988). Warning and compliance: Behavioral effects of cost and consensus. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 32nd Annual Meeting, 901–904.

22.

Wogalter, M.S. , & Young, S.L. (1991). Behavioral compliance to voice and print messages. Ergonomics, 34, 79–89.

23.

Young, M.J. , & deTurck, M.A. (1995). Increasing compliance with safety information. Paper presented to the International Communication Association, May, Albequerque, NM.

24.

Young, S.L. (1997). The role of pictorials in environmental safety signs. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society and Ergonomics Society 41st Annual Meeting, 797–800.

25.

Young, S.L. , Wogalter, M.S. , & Brelsford, J.W., Jr. (1992). Relative contribution of likelihood and severity of injury to risk perceptions. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 36th Annual Meeting, 1014–1018.

26.

Young, S.L. , Wogalter, M.S. , Laughery, K.R. , Magurno, A. , & Lovvoll, D. (1995). Relative order and space allocation of message components in hazard warning signs. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 39th Annual Meeting, 969–973.