Two experiments were conducted to compare the discrimination, acquisition, and retention of movements made with and without elastic resistance. Using methods from psychophysics, Experiment 1 revealed that a discrete 800-mm movement could be discriminated equally precisely when it was performed with and without elastic resistance. Similarly, there was no difference in the spatial accuracy of a discrete aiming movement made with and without elastic resistance when extended practice with knowledge of results (KR) was provided in Experiment 2. Contrary to expectation, when KR about the outcome of the movement was removed on a retention test given 24 h after practice, the accuracy of the movements made with elastic resistance declined much more rapidly than those made without resistance. These findings question the common assumption that elastic resistance is a desirable characteristic of a control mechanism. Actual or potential applications of this research include the design of control mechanisms that facilitate performance under a variety of task and environmental conditions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adams, J. A. (1977). Feedback theory of how joint receptors regulate the timing and positioning of a limb. Psychological Review, 84, 504–523.
2.
Bahrick, H. P. (1957). An analysis of stimulus variables influencing the proprioceptive control of movements. Psychological Review, 64, 324–328.
3.
Bahrick, H. P., Bennett, W. F., & Fitts, P. M. (1955). Accuracy of positioning responses as a function of spring loading in a control. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49, 437–444.
4.
Bahrick, H. P., Fitts, P. M., & Schneider, R. (1955). Reproduction of simple movements as a function of factors influencing proprioceptive feedback. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49, 445–454.
5.
Battig, W. F. (1979). The flexibility of human memory. In L. S. Cermak & F. I. M. Craik(Eds.), Levels of processing in human memory (pp. 23–44). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
6.
Bilodeau, E. A., Bilodeau, I. M., & Schumsky, D. A. (1959). Some effects of introducing and withdrawing knowledge of results early and late in practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 142–144.
7.
Briggs, G. E., Fitts, P. M., & Bahrick, H. P. (1957). Effects of force and amplitude cues on learning and performance in a complex tracking task. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, 262–268.
8.
Diewert, G. L., & Roy, E. (1978). Coding strategy for memory of movement extent information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 666–675.
9.
Ellis, M. J. (1969). Control dynamics and timing a discrete motor response. Journal of Motor Behavior, 1, 119–134.
10.
Eysenck, M. W. (1979). Depth, elaboration and distinctiveness. In L. S. Cermak & F. I. M. Craik(Eds.), Levels of processing in human memory (pp. 89–118). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
11.
Fowler, S. C., & Notterman, J. M. (1975). An observed short-term memory effect for isometric force emission. Perception and Psychophysics, 17, 393–397.
12.
Greenhouse, S. W., & Geisser, S. (1959). On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika, 24, 95–112.
13.
Howarth, C. I., & Beggs, W. D. A. (1981). Discrete movements. In D. Holding (Ed.), Human skills (pp. 91–117). Chichester, England: Wiley.
14.
Jenkins, W. O. (1947). A psychophysical investigation of ability to reproduce pressure. In P. M. Fitts (Ed.), Psychological research on equipment design (pp. 171–186). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
15.
Kelso, J. A. S., & Stelmach, G. E. (1976). Central and peripheral mechanisms in motor control. In G. E. Stelmach (Ed.), Motor control: Issues and trends (pp. 1–40). New York: Academic.
16.
Kerr, G. K., & Marshall, R. N. (1995). Adaptation of arm movements to altered loads: Implications for sensorimotor transformations. In D. J. Glencross & J. P. Piek(Eds.), Motor control and sensory-motor integration: Issues and directions (pp. 321–329). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
17.
Laabs, G. J., & Simmons, R. W. (1981). Motor memory. In D. Holding (Ed.), Human skills (pp. 119–151). New York: Wiley.
18.
Magill, R. A., & Parks, P. F. (1983). The psychophysics of kinesthesis for positioning responses: The physical stimulus-psychological response relationship. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 54, 346–351.
19.
Matlin, M. W. (1988). Sensation and perception (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
20.
Paillard, J., & Brouchon, M. (1968). Active and passive movements in the calibration of position sense. In S. J. Freedman (Ed.), The neuropsychology of spatially oriented behavior (pp. 37–56). Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.
21.
Sanders, M. S., & McCormick, E. J. (1993). Human factors in engineering and design (7th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
22.
Schmidt, R. A. (1988). Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis (2nd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
23.
Shadmehr, R., & Mussa-Ivaldi, F. A. (1994). Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task. Journal of Neuroscience, 14, 3208–3224.
24.
Smyth, M. M. (1984). Memory for movements. In M. M. Smyth & A. M. Wing(Eds.), The psychology of human movement (pp. 83–117). London: Academic.
25.
Stelmach, G. E. (1968). The accuracy of reproducing target positions under various tensions. Psychonomic Science, 13, 287–288.
26.
Trowbridge, M. H., & Cason, H. (1932). An experimental study of Thorndike's theory of learning. Journal of General Psychology, 7, 245–258.
27.
Wallace, S. A. (1977). The coding of location: A test of the target hypothesis. Journal of Motor Behavior, 9, 157–159.
28.
Wann, J. P., & Ibrahim, S. F. (1992). Does limb proprioception drift?Experimental Brain Research, 91, 162–166.
29.
Weiss, B. (1954). The role of proprioceptive feedback in positioning responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 215–224.
30.
Williams, I. D. (1974). Practice and augmentation in learning. Human Factors, 16, 503–507.
31.
Young, D. E., & Schmidt, R. A. (1992). Augmented feedback for enhanced skill acquisition. In G. E. Stelmach & J. Requin(Eds.), Tutorials in motor behavior II (pp. 677–693. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
