Critical decisions are made every day by teams of individuals who must coordinate their activities to achieve effectiveness. Researchers recently suggested that a shared mental model (SMM) among team members may help them to make successful decisions. Several avenues for developing SMMs in teams exist, one of which is planning. We explored the relationship between team planning, SMMs, and coordinated team decision making and performance. Results indicated that effective planning increased the SMM among team members, allowed them to utilize efficient communication strategies during high-workload conditions, and resulted in improved coordinated team performance. In addition, the communication strategy alone affected the degree of coordinated performance attained by teams during periods of increased workload. Implications of these results and team functioning are discussed. Actual or potential applications of this research include performance and training in settings that require interdependent actions among operators.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Blickensderfer, E., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., & Salas, E. (1997a). Theoretical bases for team self-correction: Fostering shared mental models. In M. Beyerlein, D. Johnson, & S. Beyerlein(Eds.), Advances in interdisciplinary studies of work teams (Vol. 4, pp. 249–279). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
2.
Blickensderfer, E., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., & Salas, E. (1997b, April). Training teams to self-correct: An empirical investigation. Paper presented at the 12th Annual Meeting of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, St. Louis, MO.
3.
Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Salas, E., & Converse, S. A. (1993). Shared mental models in expert team decision making. In N. J. Castellan, Jr. (Ed.), Current issues in individual and group decision making (pp. 221–246). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
4.
Driskell, J. E., & Salas, E. (1992). Can you study real teams in contrived settings ? The value of small group research to understanding teams. In R. W. Swezey & E. Salas(Eds.), Teams: Their training and performance (pp. 101–124). New York: Ablex.
5.
Entin, E. E., Serfaty, E., & Deckert, J. C. (1994). Team adaptation and coordination training (Contract No. N61339-91-C-0142). Burlington, MA: ALPHATECH, Inc.
6.
Ginnett, R. C. (1987). First encounters of the close kind: The formation process of airline flight crews. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Yale University.
7.
Goldsmith, T., & Johnson, P. J. (1990). A structural assessment of classroom learning. In R. W. Schvanveldt (Ed.), Pathfinder associative networks: Studies in knowledge organization (pp. 241–254). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
8.
Goldsmith, T., & Kraiger, K. (1997). Structural knowledge assessment and training evaluation. In J. K. Ford, S. W. J. Kozlowski, K. Kraiger, E. Salas, & M. S. Teachout(Eds.), Improving training effectiveness in work organizations (pp. 73–96). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
9.
Gualtieri, J., Fowlkes, J., & Ricci, K. (1996). Measuring individual and team knowledge structures for use in training. Training Research Journal, 4, 117–141.
10.
Hackman, J. R. (1987). Group level issues in the design and training issues of cockpit crews: Cockpit resource management training (Tech. Report No. NASA CP-2455). Moffett Field, CA: NASA Ames Research Center.
11.
Hackman, J. R., Brousseau, K. R., & Weiss, J. A. (1976). The interaction of task design and group performance strategies in determining group effectiveness. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 350–365.
12.
Hackman, J. R., & Walton, R. E. (1986). Leading groups in organizations. In P. S. Goodman & Associates (Eds.), Designing effective work groups (pp. 72–119). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
13.
Heffner, T. S., Mathieu, J. E., & Goodwin, G. F. (1995, May). An empirical investigation of mental models in team performance. In J. E. Mathieu (Chair), Mental models and team effectiveness: Three empirical tests. Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Orlando, FL.
14.
Hollis, A., Tavares, G., & Meier, S. (1986). Gunship: The attack helicopter simulation [Computer program]. Hunt Valley, MD: Micro Prose Software.
15.
Johnston, W. A., & Briggs, G. E. (1968). Team performance as a function of team arrangement and workload. Journal of Applied Psychology, 52, 89–94.
16.
Kanki, B. G., Lozito, S., & Foushee, H. C. (1989, January). Communication indices of crew coordination. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 60, 56–60.
17.
Klein, G. A., Orasanu, J., Calderwood, R., & Zsambok, C. E. (Eds.). (1993). Decision making in action: Models and methods.Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
18.
Kraiger, K., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (1993). Measuring knowledge organization as a method for assessing learning during training. Human Factors, 37, 804–816.
19.
Krumm, R. L., & Farina, A. J. (1962). Effectiveness of integrated flight simulator training in promoting B-52 crew coordinationa (MRL Tech. Documentary Report 62-1). Wright Patterson Air Force Base, OH: Aerospace Medical Research Laboratories.
20.
Lanzetta, J. T., & Roby, T. B. (1960). The relationship between certain group process variables and group problem solving efficiency. Journal of Social Psychology, 52, 135–148.
21.
Minionis, D. P. (1994). Enhancing team performance in adverse conditions: The role of shared team mental models and team training on an interdependent task. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA.
22.
Minionis, D. P., Zaccaro, S. J., & Perez, R. (1995). Shared mental models, team coordination, and team performance. Paper presented at the 10th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial/Organizational Psychology, Orlando, FL.
23.
Moore, M. L. (1978). Assessing organizational planning and teamwork: An action research methodology. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 14, 479–491.
24.
Orasanu, J. M. (1990). Shared mental models and crew decision-making (CSL Tech. Report No. 46). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University, Cognitive Science Laboratory.
25.
Oser, R. L., Prince, C, W., Morgan, B. B., Jr., & Simpson, S. S. (1991). An analysis of aircrew communication patterns and content (Tech. Report No. NTSC 90-0009). Orlando, FL: Naval Training Systems Center, Human Factors Division.
26.
Rouse, W. B., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., & Salas, E. (1992). The role of mental models in team performance in complex systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 22, 1296–1308.
27.
Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1990). Pathfinder associative networks: Studies in knowledge organization.Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
28.
Schvaneveldt, R. W., Durso, F. T., Goldsmith, T. E., Breen, T. J., Cooke, N. M., Tucker, R. G., & DeMaio, J. C. (1985). Measuring the structure of expertise. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 23, 699–728.
29.
Stasser, G. (1992). Pooling of unshared information during group discussion. In S. Worchel, W. Wood, & J. A. Simpson (Eds.), Group process and productivity (pp. 48–67). Newbury Park: Sage.
30.
Stout, R. J., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., & Salas, E. (1996). The role of shared mental models in developing team situational awareness: Implications for training. Training Research Journal, 2, 86–116.
31.
Stout, R. J., & Salas, E. (1993). The role of planning in coordinated decision making: Implications for training. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 37th Annual Meeting (pp. 1238–1242). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
32.
Thorton, G. C., III, & Byham, W. C. (1982). Assessment centers and managerial performance. Orlando, FL: Academic.
33.
Volpe, C. E., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Salas, E., & Spector, P. (1996). The impact of cross training on team functioning. Human Factors, 38, 87–100.
34.
Wiener, E. L., Kanki, B. G., & Helmreich, R. L. (Eds.). (1993). Cockpit resource management.San Diego, CA: Academic.
35.
Zaccaro, S. J., Gualtieri, J., & Minionis, D. (1995). Task cohesion as a facilitator of team decision making under temporal urgency. Military Psychology, 7, 77–93.
