Effectiveness of Menu Orientation in Chinese

Abstract

Graphical user interface guidelines have been developed predominantly in English-speaking countries, but aspects related to culture (e.g., local metaphors, symbols, color, and flow) are not universal and have received little or no attention. Even though the reading and writing flow of languages such as English, Japanese, and Chinese differ widely, most software interfaces do not take account of this. In this paper we investigate the effectiveness of menu flow or menu orientation in both the Chinese and English languages for Chinese users. The experimental results indicate that for the Chinese population, a horizontal menu in either language is more effective than the vertical orientation. Thus item differentiation in menus is best performed when the natural flow of the user's native language is broken through a transformation process similar to a matrix transpose. Even though we did not investigate search strategies explicitly, we hypothesize that the primary reason for the difference lies in the scanning patterns adopted by the Chinese population in search tasks so that there is no mismatch in the reading metaphors. Applications of this research include the design of culturally and linguistically adapted human-computer interfaces for Chinese users.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Backs, R. , Walrath L. , & Hancock, A. (1987). Comparison of horizontal and vertical menu formats. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 31st Annual Meeting (pp. 715–717). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

Card, S. K. , Moran, T. P. , & Newell, A. (1983). The psychology of human-computer interaction. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Fernandes, T. (1995). Global interface design. Chestnut Hill, MA: AP Professional.

Goonetilleke, R. S. (1990). Humans in complex control tasks: Mental model development and use. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY.

MacKenzie, I. S. , & Buxton, W. (1994). Prediction of pointing and dragging times in graphical user interfaces. Interacting with Computers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 6, 213–227.

Marcus, A. (1993). Human communications issues in advanced UIs. Communications of ACM, 36(4), 101–109.

Marcus, A. (1995, July). User interface design for multimedia online services (Workshop notes). Presented at HCI International ′95 in Yokohama, Japan.

Mayhew, D. (1992). Principles and guidelines in software user interface design. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Nielsen, J. (1990). Usability testing for international interfaces. In J. Nielsen (Ed.), Designing user interfaces for international use (pp. 39–44) Amsterdam: Elsevier.

10.

Russo, P. , & Boor S. (1993). How fluent is your interface? Designing for international users. In Human Factors in Computing Systems- INTERCHI ′93 (pp. 342–347). Amsterdam: IOS.

11.

Shiffrin, R. M. , & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84, 127–190.

12.

Shneiderman, B. (1992). Designing the user interface. Singapore: Addison-Wesley.

13.

Snoddy, G. S. (1926). Learning and stability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 10, 1–36.

14.

Sukaviriya, P. , & Moran, L. (1990). User interfaces for Asia. In J. Nielsen (Ed.), Designing user interfaces for international use (pp. 189–218). New York: Elsevier.

15.

Wickens, C. D. (1992). Engineering psychology and human performance. New York: HarperCollins.