In their critique of our research, Sanderson and Benda (1998, this issue) suggest several concerns with our characterization and utilization of the Exploratory Sequential Data Analysis (ESDA) approach. In this response, we consider each of the concerns in the context of training needs analysis. We conclude that the ESDA framework appears to hold promise as a training needs analysis tool. However, further dialogue between the experts in the ESDA approach and those in training is required to realize this potential.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bowers, C., Jentsch, F., Salas, E., and Braun, C. (1998). Analyzing communication sequences for team training needs assessment. Human Factors, 40, 672—679.
2.
Sanderson, P., & Benda, P. (1998). Exploring sequential data: Commentary on Bowers, Jentsch, Salas, and Braun (1998). Human Factors, 40, 680—684.
3.
Sanderson, P., & Fisher, C. (1997). Exploratory Sequential Data Analysis: Qualitative and quantitative handling of continuous observational data. In G. Salvendy (Ed.), Handbook of human factors and ergonomics (2nd ed., pp. 1471—1513). New York: Wiley.
