Frame of Reference Effects on Scientific Visualization Subtasks

Abstract

Performance measures for 3 frames of reference (full exocentric, full egocentric, and tethered) were contrasted across 4 different scientific visualization subtasks: search, travel, local judgment support, and global judgment support. Participants were instructed to locate and follow a designated path through 15 simple virtual environments and to answer simple questions about that environment. Each participant completed 5 trials in every frame of reference condition (exocentric, egocentric, and tethered). The results revealed that frames of reference that utilize egocentric or tethered viewpoints support better travel performance, especially when nearing the target. However, the exocentric frame of reference supported better performance in the search subtasks and in the local and global judgment subtasks. Actual or potential applications of this research include proper uses of virtual reality to support certain scientific visualization subtasks.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abarbanel, R. , Friedhoff, R. M. , Langridge, R. , Pearlman, J. D. , & Star, J. L. (1993, October). Is visualization REALLY necessary? The role of visualization in science, engineering, and medicine. Paper presented at the meeting of the IEEE Computer Society Technical Committee on Computer Graphics, San Jose, CA.

Aretz, A. J. (1991). The design of electronic map displays. Human Factors, 33, 85–101.

Barfield, W. , & Furness, T. (Eds.). (1995). Virtual environments and advanced interface design. New York: Oxford University Press.

Barfield, W. , Rosenberg, C. , & Furness, T. (1995). Situational awareness as a function of frame of reference, virtual eyepoint elevation, and geometric field of view. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 5, 233–256.

Durlach, N. I. , & Mavor, A. (Eds.). (1995). Virtual reality: Scientific and technological challenges. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Golovchinsky, G. , & Chignell, M. (1993). Queries-r-links: Graphical markup for text navigation. In Interchi ′93: Conference on Human Factors in Computing (pp. 454–460). New York: Association for Computing Machinery SIGCHI.

Liang, C.-C. , Wickens, C. D. , & Olmos, O. (1995). Perspective electronic map evaluation in visual flight. In R. Jensen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology (pp. 104–109). Columbus, OH: Ohio State University, Department of Aviation.

Newby, G. (1992). An investigation of the role of navigation for information retrieval. In D. Shaw (Ed.), Proceedings of the 55th American Society for Information Science Annual Meeting (pp. 20–25). Medford, NJ: Learned Information.

Olmos, O., Wickens, C. D., & Chudy, A. (in press). Tactical displays for combat awareness: An examination of dimensionality and frame of reference concepts and the application of cognitive engineering. International Journal of Aviation Psychology.

10.

Rheingold, H. (1991). Virtual reality. New York: Summit.

11.

Vincow, M. A. , & Wickens, C. D. (1998). Frame of reference and navigation through document visualizations: Flying through information space. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 42nd Annual Meeting (pp. 511–515). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

12.

Warren, R. , & Wertheim, A. H. (Eds.). (1990). Perception and control of self-motion. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

13.

Wickens, C. D. , & Baker, P. (1995). Cognitive issues in virtual reality. In W. Barfield & T. Furness (Eds.), Virtual environments and advanced interface design (pp. 514–541). New York: Oxford University Press.

14.

Wickens, C. D. , Liang, C.-C. , Prevett, T. T. , & Olmos, O. (1994). Egocentric and exocentric displays for terminal area navigation. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 32nd Annual Meeting (pp. 16–20). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

15.

Wickens, C. D. , Liang, C.-C. , Prevett, T. T. , & Olmos, O. (1996). Electronic maps for terminal area navigation: Effects of frame of reference and dimensionality. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 6, 241–271.

16.

Wickens, C. D. , Merwin, D. H. , & Lin, E. L. (1994). Implications of graphic enhancements of scientific data: Dimensional integrality, stereopsis, motion and mesh. Human Factors, 36, 44–61.

17.

Wickens, C. D. , & Prevett, T. T. (1995). Exploring the dimensions of egocentricity in aircraft navigation displays. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 1, 110–135.

18.

Woods, D. D. (1984). Visual momentum: A concept to improve the cognitive coupling of person and computer. International Journal of Man Machine Systems Studies, 21, 229–244.