Nonvisually Guided Locomotion to a Previously Viewed Target in Real and Virtual Environments

Abstract

Comparing human performance in a virtual environment (VE) with performance in the real world can provide clues about which aspects of VE technology require improvement. Using a technique previously shown to measure real-world distance judgments accurately, we compared performance in a real-world environment with performance in a virtual model of that environment. The technique required participants to walk without vision to a target after viewing it for 10 s. VE distance judgments averaged 85% of the target distance, whereas real-world judgments averaged 92%. The magnitude of the relative errors in the VE was twice that in the real world, indicating that the VE degraded distance judgments. Our analysis suggests that VE performance deficits result either from poor binocular disparity cues or from distortion of pictorial depth cues. Actual or potential applications of this research include the development of virtual environments for training and the design of visual displays for virtual simulations.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bailey, J. H. , & Witmer, B. G. (1994). Learning and transfer of spatial knowledge in a virtual environment. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 38th Annual Meeting (pp. 1158–1162). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

Cutting, J. E. , & Vishton, P. M. (1995). Perceiving layout and knowing distances: The integration, relative potency, and contextual use of different information about depth. In W. Epstein & S. J. Rogers (Eds.), Handbook of perception and cognition: Vol. 5. Perception of space and motion (pp. 69–117). New York: Academic.

Elliott, D. (1986). Continuous visual information may be important after all: A failure to replicate Thomson (1983). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12, 388–391.

Elliott, D. (1987). The influence of walking speed and prior practice on locomotor distance estimation. Journal of Motor Behavior, 19, 476–485.

Lampton, D. R. , Singer, M. J. , McDonald, D. , & Bliss, J. P. (1995). Distance estimation in virtual environments. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 39th Annual Meeting (pp. 1268–1272). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

Laurent, M. , & Thomson, J. A. (1988). The role of visual information in control of a constrained locomotor task. Journal of Motor Behavior, 20, 17–37.

National Research Council . (1997). Tactical display for soldiers: Human factors considerations. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

O'Brien, R. G. , & Kaiser, M. K. (1985). MANOVA as a method for analyzing repeated measures designs: An extensive primer. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 316–333.

Payne, M. C., Jr. (1964). Color as an independent variable in perceptual research. Psychological Bulletin, 61, 199–208.

10.

Rieser, J. J. , Ashmead, D. H. , Talor, C. R. , & Youngquist, G. A. (1990). Visual perception and guidance of locomotion without vision to previously seen targets. Perception, 19, 675–689.

11.

Steenhuis, R. E. , & Goodale, M. A. (1988). The effects of time and distance on accuracy of target-directed locomotion: Does an accurate short-term memory for spatial location exist? Journal of Motor Behavior, 20, 399–415.

12.

Stuart, R. (1996). The design of virtual environments. New York: McGraw-Hill.

13.

Surdick, R. T. , Davis, E. , King, R. A. , & Hodges, L. F. (1997). The perception of distance in simulated visual displays: A comparison of the effectiveness and accuracy of multiple depth cues across viewing distances. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 6, 513–531.

14.

Thomson, J. A. (1983). Is continuous visual monitoring necessary in visually guided locomotion? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 427–443.

15.

Witmer, B. G. , & Kline, P. B. (1997). Training efficiently in virtual environments: Determinants of distance perception of stationary observers viewing stationary objects (ARI Research Note 97-36; DTIC AD No. AD-A337 488). Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.

16.

Witmer, B. G. , & Kline, P. B. (1998). Judging perceived and traversed distance in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 7, 144–167.

17.

Wright, R. H. (1995). Virtual reality psychophysics: Forward and lateral distance, height, and speed perceptions with a wide angle helmet display (ARI Tech. Report 1025). Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.