Effects of Variation in System Responsiveness on User Performance in Virtual Environments

Abstract

System responsiveness (SR) is defined as the elapsed time until a system responds to user control. SR fluctuates over time, so it must be described statistically with mean (MSR) and standard deviation (SDSR). In this paper, we examine SR in virtual environments (VEs), outlining its components and methods of experimental measurement and manipulation. Three studies of MSR and SDSR effects on performance of grasp and placement tasks are then presented. The studies used within-subjects designs with 11, 12, and 10 participants, respectively. Results showed that SDSR affected performance only if it was above 82 ms. Placement required more frequent visual feedback and was more sensitive to SR. We infer that VE designers need not tightly control SDSR and may wish to vary SR control based on required visual feedback frequency. These results may be used to improve the human-computer interface in a wide range of interactive graphical applications, including scientific visualization, training, mental health, and entertainment.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Airey, J. , Rohlf, J. , & Frederick, P. (1990). Towards image realism with interactive update rates in complex virtual building environments. In Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics (pp. 41–50). New York: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM).

Bryson, S. (1993). Implementing virtual reality (SIGGRAPH 1993 Course #43 notes, pp. 1.1.1-1.6.6, 16.1-16.12). (Available from the Association for Computing Machinery, 1515 Broadway, 17th Fl., New York, NY 10010)

Card, S. K. , Robertson, G. G. , & Mackinlay, J. D. (1991). The information visualizer, an information workspace. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 181–188). New York: ACM.

Ferrell, W. R. (1966). Delayed force feedback. Human Factors, 8, 449–455.

Funkhouser, T. , & Séquin, C. (1993). Adaptive display algorithm for interactive frame raes during visualization of complex virtual environments. In Computer graphics (annual conference series, SIGGRAPH 93 Conference Proceedings, pp. 247–254). New York: ACM.

Liang, J. , Shaw, C. , & Green, M. (1991). On temporal-spatial realism in the virtual environment. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium of User Interface Software and Technology (pp. 19–25). New York: ACM.

MacKenzie, I. S. , & Ware, C. (1993). Lag as a determinant of human performance in interactive systems. In Proceedings of the INTERCHI ′93 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 488–493). New York: ACM.

McKenna, M. D. , & Zeltzer, D. (1992). Three dimensional visual display systems for virtual environments. Presence, 1, 421–458.

Mine, M. (1993). Characterization of end-to-end delays in headmounted display systems (Tech. Report TR93-001). Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Computer Science.

10.

National Science Foundation . (1992). Research directions in virtual environments: Report of an NSF invitational workshop. Computer Graphics, 26(3), 153–177.

11.

Pausch, R. (1991). Virtual reality on five dollars a day. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 265–269). New York: ACM.

12.

Sheridan, T. (1992). Telerobotics, automation, and human supervisory control. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

13.

Tharp, G. , Liu, A. , French, L. , Lai, G. , & Stark, L. (1992). Timing considerations of helmet mounted display performance. In Human vision, visual processing, and digital displays III (Vol. 1666, pp. 570–576). Bellingham, WA: SPIE.

14.

Van Dam, A. (1993). VR as a forcing function: Software implications of a new paradigm. In IEEE Symposium on Research Frontiers in Virtual Reality (pp. 5–8). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press.

15.

Ware, C. , & Balakrishnan, R. (1994). Reaching for objects in VR displays: Lag and frame rate. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 1, 331–356.

16.

Watson, A. B. (1986). Temporal sensitivity. In K. Boff , L. Kaufmann , & J. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of human perception and performance (Vol. 1, pp. 6-1–6-43). New York: Wiley.

17.

Watson, B. (1997). Level of detail management. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta.

18.

Watson, B. , Spaulding, V. , Walker, N. , & Ribarsky, W. (1997). Evaluation of the effects of frame time variation on VR task performance. In Proceedings of the Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium (pp. 38–44). Albuquerque, NM: IEEE.

19.

Wickens, C. D. (1986). The effects of control dynamics on performance. In K. Boff , L. Kaufmann , & J. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of human perception and performance (Vol. 2, pp. 619–689). New York: Wiley.

20.

Wickens, C. D. (1992). Engineering psychology and human performance (2nd ed.). New York: HarperCollins.

21.

Wloka, M. (1995). Lag in multiprocessor virtual reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Human Performance, 4, 50–63.