Sound localization has been studied extensively. Curiously, although much is known about factors that affect errors, little is known about factors that influence response time. Three experiments were performed in an attempt to identify the separate influence of each of several different factors. All trials used a single broadband noise signal emanating from one of a subset of six loudspeakers equally spaced around the participant in the azimuthal plane. Both the size of the subset and the balance of relative probabilities from speaker to speaker were altered to evaluate the relationship between information content and the dependent variable, choice reaction time. Choice reaction time was found to be related to the information content of the sound stimulus in all cases. It was also found to be related to the presence of pairs of speakers that were symmetrically opposed in front of and behind the participant. Models of choice reaction time in a sound localization task have clear implications for practice. For example, they suggest that multiple auditory collision warnings may endanger drivers.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Baddeley, A. (1992). Working memory.. Science, 255, 556–559.
2.
Bobis, J., Sweller, J. & Cooper, M. (1993). Cognitive load effects in a primary school geometry task.. Learning and Instruction, 3, 1–21.
3.
Chandler, P. & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction.. Cognition and Instruction, 8, 293–332.
4.
Chandler, P. & Sweller, J. (1992). The split-attention effect as a factor in the design of instruction.. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 62, 233–246.
5.
Chandler, P. & Sweller, J. (1996). Cognitive load while learning to use a computer program.. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 1–20.
6.
Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R., & Rees, E. (1982). Expertise in problem solving. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (pp. 7–75). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7.
Ericsson, K. A., & Charness, N. (1994). Expert performance: Its structure and acquisition.. American Psychologist, 49, 725–747.
8.
Kotovsky, K., Hayes, J. R., & Simon, H. A. (1985). Why are some problems hard? Evidence from Tower of Hanoi.. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 248–294.
9.
Larkin, J. H., McDermott, J., Simon, D. P., & Simon, H. A. (1980). Models of competence in solving physics problems.. Cognitive Science, 4, 317–348.
10.
Mayer, R. (1989). Systematic thinking fostered by illustrations in scientific text.. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 240–246.
11.
Mayer, R. E. (1997). Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions?. Educational Psychologist, 32, 1–19.
12.
Mayer, R. & Anderson, R. (1991). Animations need narrations: An experimental test of a dual-coding hypothesis.. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 484–490.
13.
Mayer, R. & Anderson, R. (1992). The instructive animation: Helping students build connections between words and pictures in multimedia learning.. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 444–452.
14.
Mayer, R., Bove, W., Bryman, A., Mars, R. & Tapangco, L. (1996). When less is more: Meaningful learning from visual and verbal summaries of science textbook lessons.. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 64–73.
15.
Mayer, R. & Gallini, J. (1990). When is an illustration worth ten thousand words?. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 715–726.
16.
Mayer, R., Stiehl, C. & Greeno, J. (1975). Acquisition of understanding and skill in relation to subjects' preparation and meaningfulness of instruction.. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 331–350.
17.
McNamara, D., Kintsch, E., Songer, N. B., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text.. Cognition and Instruction, 14, 1–43.
18.
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.
19.
Moray, N. (1982). Subjective mental workload.. Human Factors, 24, 25–40.
20.
Mousavi, S. Y., Low, R. & Sweller, J. (1995). Reducing cognitive load by mixing auditory and visual presentation modes.. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 319–334.
21.
O'Donnell, R. D., & Eggemeier, F. T. (1986). Workload assessment methodology. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance (Vol. 2, chapter 42, pp. 1–49). New York: Wiley.
22.
Paas, F. & Van Merrienboer, J. (1993). The efficiency of instructional conditions: An approach to combine mental-effort and performance measures.. Human Factors, 35, 737–743.
23.
Paas, F. & Van Merrienboer, J. (1994). Variability of worked examples and transfer of geometrical problem-solving skills: A cognitive-load approach.. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 122–133.
24.
Schneider, W. & Shiffrin, R. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search and attention.. Psychological Review, 84, 1–66.
25.
Shiffrin, R. & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory.. Psychological Review, 84, 127–190.
26.
Shute, V. J. (1992). Aptitude-treatment interactions and cognitive skill diagnosis. In J. W. Regian & V. J. Shute (Eds.), Cognitive approaches to automated instruction (pp. 15–47). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
27.
Shute, V. J. (1993). A comparison of learning environments: All that glitters … In S. P. Lajoie & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Computers as cognitive tools (pp. 47–74). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
28.
Shute, V. J., & Gluck, K. A. (1996). Individual differences in patterns of spontaneous online tool use.. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 5, 329–355.
29.
Snow, R. & Lohman, D. (1984). Toward a theory of cognitive aptitude for learning from instruction.. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 347–376.
30.
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning.. Cognitive Science, 12, 257–285.
31.
Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty and instructional design.. Learning and Instruction, 4, 295–312.
32.
Sweller, J. & Chandler, P. (1994). Why some material is difficult to learn.. Cognition and Instruction, 12, 185–233.
33.
Sweller, J., Chandler, P., Tierney, P. & Cooper, M. (1990). Cognitive load as a factor in the structuring of technical material.. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 176–192.
34.
Tarmizi, R. & Sweller, J. (1988). Guidance during mathematical problem solving.. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 424–436.
35.
Tindall-Ford, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1997). When two sensory modes are better than one.. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 3, 257–287.
36.
Ward, M. & Sweller, J. (1990). Structuring effective worked examples.. Cognition and Instruction, 7, 1–39.
