Vision and Driving: Selective Effect of Optical Blur on Different Driving Tasks

Abstract

A test of static (high-contrast) visual acuity is the most prevalent vision test used to screen driver license applicants worldwide, even though research has largely failed to provide convincing empirical evidence for its role in traffic accidents. The purpose of this research was to evaluate the effect of visual acuity degradation on different components of the driving task. Participants were 24 young licensed drivers (15 men, 9 women) with normal vision. Driving performance was measured while participants wore modified swimmer's goggles to which blurring lenses were affixed in amounts necessary to produce binocular visual acuity levels of 20/20, 20/40 (the prevalent acuity standard for driving), 20/100, and 20/200. Driving performance was measured using the closed-road method of Wood and Troutbeck (1994). Acuity degradation produced significant decrements in road sign recognition and road hazard avoidance as well as significant increments in total driving time. Participants′ abilities to estimate whether clearances between pairs of traffic cones were sufficiently wide to permit safe passage of the vehicle and to slalom through a series of traffic cones were relatively unaffected by acuity degradation. Thus the latter tasks appear to be mediated by aspects of central and peripheral vision that are relatively unaffected by optical blur. Potential applications of this type of research include the development of procedures for defining empirically justifiable vision standards for driver licensure.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bailey, I. , & Sheedy, J. (1988). Vision screening for driver licensure. In Transportation Research Board (Ed.), Transportation in an aging society: Improving mobility and safety for older persons (Vol. 2, Special Report 218, pp. 294–324). Washington, DC: National Research Council.

Ball, K. , Owsley, C. , Sloane, M. E. , Roenker, D. L. , & Bruni, J. R. (1993). Visual attention problems as a predictor of vehicle crashes in older drivers. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 23, 3110–3123.

Barr, R. A. (1991). Recent changes in driving among older adults. Human Factors, 33, 597–600.

Betts, T. , Knight, R. , Crowe, A. , Blake, A. , Harvey, P. , & Mortiboy, D. (1985). Effect of β-blockers on psychomotor performance in normal volunteers. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 28(Suppl.), 39–49.

Burg, A. (1967). The relationship between vision test scores and driving record: General findings (Report 68-24). Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles, Department of Engineering.

Decina, L. E. , & Staplin, L. (1993). Retrospective evaluation of alternative vision screening criteria for older and younger drivers. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 25, 267–275.

Higgins, K. E. (1996). Low vision driving among normal drivers. In B. Rosenthal & R. Cole (Eds.), Remediation and management of low vision (pp. 225–236). St. Louis: Mosby.

Leibowitz, H. W. , & Owens, D. A. (1977). Nighttime accidents and selective visual degradation. Science, 197, 422–423.

Leibowitz, H. W. , & Owens, D. A. (1986). We drive by night: And when we do, we often misjudge our visual capabilities, courting disaster. Psychology Today, 20, 55–58.

10.

Leibowitz, H. W. , Post, R. B. , Brandt, T. , & Dichgans, J. (1982). Implications of recent developments in dynamic spatial orientation and visual resolution for vehicle guidance. In A. H. Wertheim , W. A. Wagenaar , & H. W. Leibowitz (Eds.), Tutorials in motion perception (pp. 231–260). New York: Plenum.

11.

Leibowitz, H. W. , Shupert-Rodemer, C. S. , & Dichgans, J. (1979). The independence of dynamic spatial orientation from luminance and refractive error. Perception and Psychophysics, 25, 75–79.

12.

Owens, D. A. , Helmers, G. , & Sivak, M. (1993). Intelligent vehicle highway systems: A call for user-centered design. Ergonomics, 36, 363–393.

13.

Owens, D. A. , & Sivak, M. (1996). Differentiation of visibility and alcohol as contributors to twilight road fatalities. Human Factors, 38, 680–689.

14.

Owens, D. A. , & Tyrrell, R. A. (1996). Visual guidance performance of young and older drivers in challenging conditions. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 34(Suppl.), 1418.

15.

Runyon, R. , & Haber, A. (1988). Fundamentals of behavioral statistic. (6th ed.). New York: Random House.

16.

Shinar, D. (1977). Driver visual limitations, diagnosis and treatment (Final Report DOT-HS-5-01275). Springfield, VA: National Technical Information Service.

17.

Shinar, D. , & Schieber, F. (1991). Visual requirements for safety and mobility of older drivers. Human Factors, 33, 507–509.

18.

Sivak, M. (1996). The information that drivers use: Is it indeed 90 percent visual? Perception, 25, 1081–1089.

19.

Sivak, M. , Olson, P. L. , & Pastalan, L. A. (1981). Effect of driver's age on nighttime legibility of highway signs. Human Factors, 23, 59–64.

20.

Stevens, J. (1996). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. (3rd ed.). New Jersey: Erlbaum.

21.

Sturr, J. F. , Kline, G. E. , & Taub, H. A. (1990). Performance of young and old drivers on a static acuity test under photopic and mesopic luminance conditions. Human Factors, 32, 1–8.

22.

Waller, P. F. (1991). The older driver. Human Factors, 33, 499–505.

23.

Wood, J. M. , & Troutbeck, R. (1994). Effect of visual impairment on driving. Human Factors, 36, 476–487.