An Empirical Examination of Metacognitive Models of Situation Assessment

Abstract

This research questioned whether participants' metacognitive models of abstract cognitive components of situation assessment were correlated with performance on concrete experimental tasks necessitating situation assessment. In this experiment, 76 naval officers were asked to (a) represent as graphic weighted networks their metacognitive models of schema-driven tactical decision making, for which situation assessment is crucial, and (b) perform experimental tasks requiring categorizing and pairwise similarity ratings of tactical situations. Canonical, regression, and correlation analyses and multidimensional scaling established that 2 of 4 metacognitive link weights were significantly associated with (a) 3 of 6 measures of sorting performance and (b) 1 of 2 dimensions derived for the scaling solution of pairwise similarity ratings. These results partially supported what was theorized regarding individuals' metacognitive models and sorting and pairwise performance.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams, M. , Tenney, Y. , & Pew, R. (1995) Situation awareness and the cognitive management of complex systems. Human Factors, 37, 85–104.

Beach, L. , & Lipshitz, R. (1993). Why classical decision theory is an inappropriate standard for evaluating and aiding most human decision making. In G. Klein , J. Orasanu , R. Calderwood , & C. Zsambok (Eds.), Decision making in action: Models and methods (pp. 21–35). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Endsley, M. (1995) Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors, 37, 32–64.

Federico, P.-A. (1995) Expert and novice recognition of similar situations. Human Factors, 37, 105–122.

Forrest-Pressley, D. , MacKinnon, G. , & Waller, T. (Eds.). (1985). Metacognition, cognition, and human performance: Volume I. Theoretical perspectives; Volume 2. Instructional practices. Orlando, FL: Academic.

Lipshitz, R. (1993). Converging themes in the study of decision making in realistic settings. In G. Klein , J. Orasanu , R. Calderwood , & C. Zsambok (Eds.), Decision making in action: Models and methods (pp. 103–137). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Means, B. , Salas, E. , Crandall, B. , & Jacobs, T. (1993). Training decision makers for the real world. In G. Klein , J. Orasanu , R. Calderwood , & C. Zsambok (Eds.), Decision making in action: Models and methods (pp. 306–326). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Metcalfe, J. , & Shimamura, A. (Eds.). (1994). Metacognition: Knowing about knowing. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Nelson, T. (Ed.). (1992). Metacognition: Core readings. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

10.

Orasanu, J. , & Connolly, T. (1993). The reinvention of decision making. In G. Klein , J. Orasanu , R. Calderwood , & C. Zsambok (Eds.), Decision making in action: Models and methods(pp. 3–20). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

11.

Schiffman, S. , Reynolds, M. , & Young, F. (1981). Introduction to multidimensional scaling: Theory, methods, and applications. New York: Academic.