Effects of Team Size on the Maximum Weight Bar Lifting Strength of Military Personnel

Abstract

Teamwork is an essential element in the majority of critical Army lifting tasks. Therefore, an understanding of the relationship between individual and team lifting capacity is of great tactical importance. Twenty-three male and 17 female U.S. Army soldiers were randomly assigned to single- and mixed-gender teams of two, three, and four persons. Individual lifting strength was the one-repetition-maximum (1RM) load lifted from floor to knuckle height using a weight bar. A square-shaped bar was used for two- and four-person lifting, and a triangular-shaped bar was used for three-person lifting. Team lifting strength as a percentage of the sum of individual lifting strength (%sum) did not change with team size. The %sum for teams of men (87.3%) was less than for teams of women (91.1%, p < 0.05). The %sums for both single-gender teams (all men and all women) were greater (p < 0.01) than for mixed-gender teams (80.2%). The number of people lifting a large object was increased to four with no decrease in the effectiveness of the individual lifter beyond that found for two persons. The 1RM loads presented in this paper were lifted under ideal conditions by young soldiers and do not represent norms for an industrial population.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baechle, T. R. , Earle, R. W. , & Allerheiligen, W. B. (1994). Strength training and spotting techniques. In T. R. Baechle (Ed.), Essentials of strength training and conditioning (pp. 345–400). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Department of the Army (1994). Military occupational classification and structure. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Gordon, C. , Churchill, T. , Clauser, C. , Bradtmiller, B. , McConville, J. , Tebbetts, I. , & Walker, R. (1988). 1988 Anthropometric survey of U.S. Army personnel: Methods and summary statistics (Tech. Rep. Natick/TR-89/027). Natick, MA: U.S. Army Natick Research, Development and Engineering Center.

Jacobs, I. , Bell, D. G. , & Pope, J. (1988) Comparison of isokinetic and isoinertial lifting tests as predictors of maximal lifting capacity. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 57, 146–153.

Jiang, B. C. , & Ayoub, M. M. (1987) Modelling of maximum acceptable load of lifting by physical factors. Ergonomics, 30, 529–538.

Johnson, M. J. , Friedl, K. E. , Frykman, P. N. , & Moore, R. J. (1994) Loss of muscle mass is poorly reflected in grip strength performance in healthy young men. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 26, 235–240.

Karwowski, W. (1988). Maximum load lifting capacity of males and females in teamwork. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 32nd Annual Meeting (pp. 680–682). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

Karwowski, W. , & Mital, A. (1986) Isometric and isokinetic testing of lifting strength of males in teamwork. Ergonomics, 29, 869–878.

Karwowski, W. , & Pongpatanasuegsa, N. (1988) Testing of isometric and isokinetic lifting strengths of untrained females in teamwork. Ergonomics, 31, 291–301.

10.

Kraemer, W. J. , & Fleck, S. J. (1982). Anaerobic metabolism and its evaluation. National Strength and Conditioning Association Journal, 4(2), 20–21.

11.

McDaniel, J. W. , Skandis, R. J. , & Madole, S. W. (1983). Weight lift capabilities of Air Force basic trainees (Tech. Rep. 83–001). Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH: U.S. Air Force Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory.

12.

Military standard human engineering design criteria for military systems, equipment, and facilities (1989). Philadelphia: Naval Publications and Forms Center.

13.

Semenick, D. M. (1994). Testing protocols and procedures. In R. R. Baechle (Ed.), Essentials of strength training and conditioning (pp. 258–273). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

14.

Sharp, M. A. , Nindl, B. C. , Westphal, K. A. , & Friedl, K. E (1994). The physical performance of female Army basic trainees who pass and fail the Army body weight and per-cent body fat standards. In Advances in industrial ergonomics and safety VI (pp. 743–750). London: Taylor & Francis.

15.

Sharp, M. A. , Rice, V. J. , Nindl, B. C. , & Williamson, T. L. (1993). Maximum lifting capacity in single and mixed gender three-person teams. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 37th Annual Meeting (pp. 725–729). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

16.

Sharp, M. A. , & Vogel, J. A. (1992). Maximal lifting strength in military personnel. In Advances in industrial ergonomics and safety IV (pp. 1261–1268). Bristol, PA: Taylor & Francis.

17.

Sherman, B. R. , & Woldstad, J. C. (1995). The effect of a commercially available support belt on torso posture, lift strength and spinal compression. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 39th Annual Meeting (pp. 605–609). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

18.

Stevenson, J. M. , Andrew, G. M. , Bryant, J. T. , Greenhorn, D. R. , & Thomson, J. M. (1989) Isoinertial tests to predict lifting performance. Ergonomics, 32, 157–166.

19.

Wathen, D. (1994). Load assignment. In T. R. Baechle (Ed.), Essentials of strength training and conditioning (pp. 435–446). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

20.

Waters, T. R. , Putz-Andereon, V. , Garg, A. , & Fine, L. J. (1993) Revised NIOSH equation for the design and evaluation of manual lifting tasks. Ergonomics, 36, 749–776.