The Effects of Spatial Frequency on Binocular Fusion: From Elementary to Complex Images

Abstract

Factors limiting binocular fusion were studied using 2-dimensional difference of Gaussian (2D-DOG) stimuli. The proportion of fused stimuli and observer's response time were determined for stimuli that varied in spatial frequency composition between 0.22 and 4.8 cycles per degree. At small disparities, mean fusion response times were short and relatively stable but increased rapidly once the disparity reached a certain critical value. This 2-phase function implies the existence of 2 separate fusional mechanism: a rapid neurally based fusional process, which operates at small disparities, and a second mechanism involving reflexive vergence movements operating at disparities 2 to 3 times larger. Both mechanisms are highly influenced by spatial frequency, being 4 to 5 times more effective at low spatial frequencies. Additional experiments demonstrated that with compound stimuli, the fusion limit is not determined by the highest spatial frequency components (as had been reported previously) but, rather, can take advantage of the additional fusional range associated with low spatial frequencies. Such cooperation may be obvious only in the case of 2-dimensional stimuli.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Burt, P. , & Julesz, B. (1980) Modifications of the classical notion of Panum's fusional area. Perception, 9, 671–682.

Diner, D. B. , & Fender, D. H. (1987) Hysteresis in human binocular fusion: Temporalward and nasalward ranges. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 4, 1814–1819.

Enroth-Cugell, C. , & Robson, J. G. (1966) The contrast sensitivity of retinal ganglion cells of the cat. Journal of Physiology, 187, 517–522.

Felton, T. B. , Richards, W. , & Smith, R. A. (1972) Disparity processing of spatial frequencies in man. Journal of Physiology, 225, 349–362.

Fender D. , & Julesz, B. (1967) Extension of Panum's fusional area in binocularly stabilized vision. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 57, 819–830.

Frisby, J. P. , & Mayhew, J. E. W. (1980) The role of spatial frequency tuned channels in vergence control. Vision Research, 20, 727–732.

Ginsborg, B. L. (1953) Small voluntary movements of the eye. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 17, 746–754.

Guttmann, J. , & Spatz, H.-C. (1985) Frequency of fusion and of loss of fusion, and binocular depth perception with alternating stimulus presentation. Perception, 14, 5–12.

Howard, I. P. , & Rogers, B. J. (1995). Binocular vision and stereopsis. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

10.

Julesz, B. , & Miller, J. E. (1975) Independent spatial frequency tuned channels in binocular fusion and rivalry. Perception, 4, 125–143.

11.

Kuffler, S. W. (1953) Discharge patterns and functional organization of mammalian retina. Journal of Neurophysiology, 16, 37–68.

12.

Kulikowski, J. J. (1978) Limits of single vision in stereopsis depends on contour sharpness. Nature, 275, 126–127.

13.

Marr, D. , & Poggio, T. (1979) A theory of human stereopsis. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B, 204, 301–328.

14.

Mitchell, D. E. (1966) Retinal disparity and diplopia. Vision Research, 6, 441–151.

15.

Mitchell, D. E. (1970) Properties of stimuli eliciting vergence eye movements and stereopsis. Vision Research, 10, 145–162.

16.

Mowforth, P. , Mayhew, J. E. W. , & Frisby, J. P. (1981) Vergence eye movements made in response to spatial frequency-filtered random-dot stereograms. Perception, 10, 299–304.

17.

Patterson, R. , Moe, L. , & Hewitt, T. (1992) Factors that affect perception in stereoscopic displays. Human Factors, 34, 655–667.

18.

Rashbass, C. , & Westheimer, G. (1961) Disjunctive eye movements. Journal of Physiology London, 159, 339–360.

19.

Richards, W. (1971). Independence of Panum's near and far limits. American Journal of Optometry and Archives of American Academy of Optometry 48, 103–109.

20.

Rohaly, A. M. , & Wilson, H. R. (1993) Nature of coarse-to-fine constraints on binocular fusion. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 10, 2433–2441.

21.

Roese, J. A. (1979) Applications of P.L.Z.T. electro-optic shutter stereoscopic displays. SPIE, 199, 152–159.

22.

Schor, C. M. , Heckmann, T. , & Tyler, C. W. (1989) Binocular fusion limits are independent of contrast, luminance gradient and component phases. Vision Research, 29, 821–835.

23.

Schor, C. M. , & Wood, I. (1983) Disparity range for local stereopsis as a function of luminance spatial frequency. Vision Research, 23, 1649–1654.

24.

Schor, C. M. , Wood, I. C. , & Ogawa, J. (1984) Binocular sensory fusion is limited by spatial resolution. Vision Research, 24, 661–665.

25.

Sollenberger, R. L. , & Milgram, P. (1993) Effects of stereoscopic and rotational displays in three dimensional path tracing task. Human Factors, 35, 483–499.

26.

Tyler, C. W. (1973) Stereoscopic vision: Cortical limitations and disparity scaling effect. Science, 181, 276–278.

27.

Tyler, C. W. (1975) Spatial organization of binocular disparity sensitivity. Vision Research, 15, 583–590.

28.

Wann, J. P. , Rushton, S. , & Mon-Williams, M. (1995) Natural problems for stereoscopic depth perception in virtual environments. Vision Research, 35, 2731–2736.

29.

Westheimer, G. , & Mitchell, G. (1956) Eye movement responses to convergent stimuli. Archives of Ophthalmology, 55, 848–856.

30.

Wilson, H. R. , Blake, R. , & Halpern, D. L. (1991) Coarse spatial scales constrain the range of binocular fusion on fine scales. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 8, 229–236.

31.

Yeh, Y.-Y. , & Silverstein, L. D. (1990) Limits of fusion and depth judgment in stereoscopic color displays. Human Factors, 32, 45–60.