Continuous Concurrent Feedback Degrades Skill Learning: Implications for Training and Simulation

Abstract

Three visual search experiments evaluated the benefits and distracting effects of using luminance and flashing to highlight subclasses of symbols coded by shape and color. Each of three general shape/color classes (circular/blue, diamond/red, square/yellow) was divided into three subclasses by presenting the upper half, lower half, or entire symbol. Increasing the luminance of a subclass by a factor of two did not result in a significant improvement in search performance. Flashing a subclass at a rate of 3 Hz resulted in a significantly shorter mean search time (48% improvement). Increasing the luminance of one subclass (by a factor of five) while simultaneously flashing another significantly improved search times by 31% and 43% respectively, compared with nonhighlighted search conditions. In each experiment, the search times for nonhighlighted target subclasses were not affected by the presence of brighter and flashing targets. The failure of the initial experiment to find a significant performance improvement caused by increasing symbol luminance suggested that a larger luminance increase was necessary for this code to be effective. The overall results suggest that using luminance and flashing to highlight subclasses of color-and shape-coded symbols can reduce search times for these subclasses without producing a distraction effect by way of a concomitant increase in the search times for unhighlighted symbols.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Annett, J. (1959). Learning a pressure under conditions of immediate and delayed knowledge of results. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 11, 3–15.

Annett, J. (1969). Feedback and human behavior. Baltimore: Penguin.

Fox, P. W. , & Levy, C. M. (1969). Acquisition of a simple motor response as influenced by the presence or absence of action visual feedback. Journal of Motor Behavior, 1, 169–180.

Greene, P. H. (1972). Problems of organization of motor systems. In R. Rosen & F. M. Snell (Eds.), Progress in theoretical biology (Vol. 2, pp. 303–338). New York: Academic.

Karlin, L. & Mortimer, R. G. (1963). Effect of verbal, visual, and auditory augmenting cues on learning a complex motor skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 75–79.

Kohl, R. M. , & Shea, C. H. (1995). Augmenting motor responses with auditory information: Guidance hypothesis implications. Human Performance, 8, 327–343,

Lintern, G. (1980). Transfer of landing skill after training with supplementary visual clues. Human Factors, 22, 81–88.

Magill, R. A. (1993). Augmented feedback in skill acquisition. In R. N. Singer , M. Murphy , & L. K. Tennant (Eds.), Handbook of research on sport psychology (pp. 193–212). New York: Macmillan.

Mulder, T. & Hulstijn, W. (1985). Sensory feedback in the learning of a novel motor task. Journal of Motor Behavior, 17, 110–128.

10.

Patrick, J. & Mutlusoy, F. (1982). The relationship between types of feedback, gain of a display, and feedback precision in acquisition of a simple motor task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 34A, 171–182.

11.

Phillips, J. R. , & Berkhout, J. (1978). Uses of feedback in computer-assisted instruction in developing psychomotor skills related to heavy machinery operation. Human Factors, 20, 415–423.

12.

Salmoni, A. W. , Schmidt, R. A. , & Walter, C. B. (1984). Knowledge of results and motor learning: A review and critical reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 355–386.

13.

Schmidt, R. A. (1988). Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis. (2nd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

14.

Schmidt, R. A. (1991). Frequent augmented feedback can degrade learning: Evidence and interpretations. In J. Requin & G. E. Stelmach (Eds.), Tutorials in motor neuroscienee (pp. 59–75). Dordrecht, Netherland: Kluwer Academic.

15.

Schmidt, R. A. , & Bjork, R. A. (1992). New conceptualizations of practice: Common principles in three paradigms suggest new concepts for training. Psychological Science, 3, 207–217.

16.

Schmidt, R. A. , Young, D. E. Swinnen, S. , & Shapiro, D. E. (1989). Summary knowledge of results for skill acquisition: Support for the guidance hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 352–359.

17.

Schneider, D. M. , & Schmidt, R. A. (1995). Units of action in motor control: Role of response complexity and target speed. Human Performance, 8, 27–49.

18.

Swinnen, S. P. , Lee, T. D. , Verschueren, S. & Serrien, D. J. (in press). Intrinsic and extrinsic information feedback for interlimb coordination: Evidence against the specificity hypothesis. Human Movement Science.

19.

Van der Linden, D. W. , Cauraugh, J. H. , & Greene, T. A. (1993). The effect of frequency of kinetic feedback on learning an isometric force production task in nondisabled subjects. Physical Therapy 73, 79–87.

20.

Winstein, C. J. (1991). Knowledge of results and motor learning-Implications for physical therapy. Physical Therapy, 71, 140–149.

21.

Wulf, G. , Lee, T. D. , & Schmidt, R. A. (1994). Reducing knowledge of results about relative versus absolute timing: Differential effects on learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 26, 362–369.

22.

Wulf, G. & Schmidt, R. A. (1994). Feedback-induced variability and the learning of generalized motor programs. Journal of Motor Behavior, 26, 348–361.

23.

Wulf, G. & Schmidt, R. A. (1997). Variability of practice and implicit motor learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 23, 987–1006.

24.

Wulf, G. Schmidt, R. A. , & Deubel, H. (1993). Reduced feedback frequency enhances generalized motor program learning but not parameterization learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1134–1150.

25.

Young, D. E. , & Schmidt, R. A. (1990). Units of motor behavior: Modifications with practice and feedback. In M. Jeannerod (Ed.), Attention and performance XIII (pp. 763–795. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.