The effects of cross-training (presence vs. absence) and workload (high vs. low) on team processes, communication, and task performance were examined. Eighty male undergraduate students were randomly assigned to one of four training conditions: cross-training, low workload; cross-training, high workload; no cross-training, low workload; and no cross-training, high workload. Results indicated that cross-training was an important determinant of effective teamwork process, communication, and performance. Predicted interactions between cross-training and workload were not supported. Implications for the design and implementation of cross-training as a means to improve team functioning are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Baker, C. V., Salas, E., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., & Spector, P. (1992, April). The effects of inter-positional uncertainty and workload on teamwork and task performance.Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Montreal, Canada.
2.
Bowers, C., Salas, E., Price, C., & Brannick, M. (1992). Games teams play: A methodology for investigating team coordination and performance. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers,24, 503–506.
3.
Brannick, M. T., Roach, P. M., & Salas, E. (1993). Understanding team performance: A multi method study. Human Performance,6, 287–308.
4.
Briggs, G. E., & Johnston, W. A. (1967). Team training (NTDC Tech. Report 1327-4). Orlando, FL: Naval Training Device Center.
5.
Briggs, G. E., & Naylor, J. C. (1965). Team versus individual training, training task fidelity and task orientation effects on transfer performed by three-man teams. Journal of Applied Psychology,49, 387–392.
6.
Cannon-Bowers, J. A., & Salas, E. (1990, April). Cognitive psychology and team training: Shared mental models in complex systems.Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Miami, FL.
7.
Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Salas, E., & Converse, S. A. (1993). Shared mental models in expert team decision-making. In N. J. Castellan, Jr. (Ed.), Current issues in individual and group decision making (pp. 355–377. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8.
Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Tannenbaum, S. I., Salas, E., & Converse, S. A. (1991). Toward an integration of training theory and technique. Human Factors,33, 281–292.
9.
Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Tannenbaum, S. I., Salas, E., & Volpe, C. E. (1995). Defining team competencies and establishing training requirements. In R. Guzzo & E. Salas, (Eds.), Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations (pp. 333–380. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
10.
Cream, B. W., & Lambertson, D. C. (1975). A functional integrated systems trainer: Technical design and operation (AFHRL-TR-75–6[III). Brooks Air Force Base, TX: U.S. Air Force Human Resources Laboratory.
11.
Hackman, J. R. (1986). The psychology of self-management in organizations. In M. S. Pallak & R. Perloff, (Eds.), Psychology and work (pp. 89–136. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
12.
Hemphill, J. K., & Rush, C. H. (1952). Studies in aircrew composition: Measurement of cross-training in B-29 aircrews (AD B958347). Columbus: Ohio State University, Columbus Personnel Research Board.
13.
Hinrichs, J. R. (1976). Personal training. In M. D. Dunnette, (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 829–860. Chicago: Rand McNally.
14.
Johnston, W. A. (1966). Transfer of team skills as a function of type of training. Journal of Applied Psychology,50, 102–108.
15.
Kahn, R. L., Wolfe, D. M., Quinn, R. P., Snoek, J. D., & Rosenthal, R. A. (1964). Organizational stress: Studies in role conflict and ambiguity.. New York: Wiley.
16.
Kidd, J. S. (1961). A comparison of one-, two-, and three-man work units under various conditions of workload. Journal of Applied Psychology,45, 195–200.
17.
Kleinman, D. L., & Serfaty, D. (1987). Team performance assessment In distributed decision making. In R. Gilson, J. P. Kincaid, & B. Goldiez, (Eds.), Proceedings of the Symposium on Interactive Networked Simulation for Training (pp. 22–27. Orlando: University of Central Florida.
18.
Kohn, C., Kleinman, D. L., & Serfaty, D. (1987). Distributed resource allocation in a team. In Proceedings Joint Director of Laboratories Symposium on Command and Control Research (pp. 221–233). Washington, DC: National Defense University.
19.
Krumm, R. L., & Farina, A. J. (1962). Effectiveness of integrated flight simulator training in promoting B-52 crew coordination (MRL Tech. Documentary Report 62–1). Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH: Aerospace Medical Research Laboratories.
20.
Lassiter, D. L., Vaughn, J. S., Smaltz, V. E., Morgan, B. B., & Salas, E. (1990). A comparison of two types of training interventions on team communication performance. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 34th Annual Meeting (pp. 1372–1376). Santa Monica. CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
McNelis, K., Salas, E., & Coovert, M. D. (1989). El Papel del modelaje de la conducta en el entrenamiento organizacional [The role of behavioral modeling in organizational training].Revista Interamericana de Psicologia Ocupacional, 8, 7–19.
23.
Orasanu, J. (1990, October). Shared mental models and crew performance (Tech. Report 46). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University, Cognitive Science Laboratories.
24.
Prince, C., & Salas, E. (1991). The utility of low fidelity simulation for training aircrew coordination skills. In Second International Training Equipment Conference and Exhibition Proceedings (pp. 87–91). Wiltshire, England: International Training Equipment Conference, Ltd.
25.
Salas, E., Dickinson, T. L., Converse, S. A., & Tannenbaum, S. I. (1992). Toward an understanding of team performance and training. In R. W. Swezey & E. Salas, (Eds.), Teams: Their training and performance (pp. 3–29). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
26.
Stout, R., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Salas, E., & Morgan, B. B. (1990). Does crew coordination behavior impact performance? In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 34th Annual Meeting (pp. 1382–1386). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
27.
Stout, R., Salas, E., & Carson, R. (1994). Individual task proficiency and team process behavior: What's important for team functioning. Military Psychology, 6, 77–192.
28.
Sundstrom, E., De Meuse, K. P., & Futrell, D. (1990). Work teams: Applications and effectiveness. American Psychologist,45, 120–133.
29.
Swezey, R. W., & Salas, E. (1992). Guidelines for use in teamtraining development. In R. W. Swezey & E. Salas, (Eds.), Teams: Their training and performance (pp. 219–245. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
30.
Urban, J. M., Bowers, C. A., Morgan, B. B., Jr., Braun, C. C., & Kline, P. B. (1992). The effects of hierarchical structure and workload on the performance of team and individual tasks. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 36th Annual Meeting (pp. 829–833). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
31.
Williges, R. C., Johnston, W. A., & Briggs, G. E. (1966). Role of verbal communication in teamwork. Journal of Applied Psychology,50, 473–478.
