BRIEF REPORT: Effectiveness of Individual and Dyadic Training Protocols: The Influence of Trainee Interaction Anxiety

Abstract

The present study focuses on the consequences of the social dynamics that are created whenever two or more individuals are brought together for the purpose of training. An investigation of the role of individual differences in interaction anxiety on training outcomes demonstrated that the comparative effectiveness of dyadic versus individual protocols for computer-based training is moderated by trainees' level of interaction anxiety. Specifically, assignment to a dyadic protocol adversely affected the performance of high-interaction-anxiety participants but appeared to be advantageous for low-interaction-anxiety participants. Implications are discussed for changing the design and implementation of computer-based protocols for training groups and individuals in military and industrial training centers.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arthur, W., Jr. , Strong, M. H. , Jordan, J. A. , Williamson, J. E. , Shebilske, W. L. , & Regian, J. W. (1995). Visual attention: Individual differences in training and predicting complex task performance. Acta Psychologica, 88, 3–23.

Arvey, R. A. , & Cole, D. A. (1989). Evaluating change due to training. In I L. Goldstein & Associates (Eds.) , Training and development in organizations (pp. 89–117. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Camacho, L. M. , & Paulus, P. B. (1995). The role of social anxiousness in group brainstorming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 1071–1080.

Donchin, E. , Fabiani, M. , & Sanders, A. (1989). The learning strategies program: An examination of the strategies in skill acquisition [Special issue]. Acta Psychologica, 71(1–3).

Driskell, J. E. , Hogan, R. , & Salas, E. (1987). Personality and group performance. In C. Hendrick , (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 9, pp. 91–112). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Eysenck, M. W. (1979). Anxiety, learning, and memory: A re-conceptualization. Journal of Research in Personality, 13, 363–385.

Gopher, D. (1993). The skill of attention control: Acquisition and execution of attention strategies. In D. Meyer & S. Korenblum , (Eds.), Attention and performance XIV: Synergies in experimental psychology, artificial intelligence, and cognitive neuroscience (pp. 299–322. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Gopher, D. , Maya, W. , & Bareket, T. (1994). Transfer of skill from a computer game trainer to flight. Human Factors, 36, 387–405.

Johnson, D. W. , & Johnson, R. T. (1994). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning. (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

10.

Kimble, C. E. , & Zehr, H. D. (1982). Self-consciousness, information load, self-presentation, and memory in a social situation. Journal of Social Psychology, 118, 39–46.

11.

Leary, M. R. (1983). Social anxiousness: The construct and its measurement. Journal of Personality Assessment, 47, 66–75.

12.

Leary, M. R. , & Kowalski, R. M. (1987). Manual for the interaction anxiousness scale. Social and Behavioral Sciences Documents, 16 (Ms. 2774), 2.

13.

Mane, A. M. , & Donchin, E. (1989). The Space Fortress game. Acta Psychologica, 71, 17–22.

14.

Reid, J. B. , Palmer, R. L. , Whitlock, J. , & Jones, J. (1973). Computer-assisted instruction performance of student pairs as related to individual differences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 65, 65–73.

15.

Shebilske, W. L. , Regian, J. W. , Arthur, W., Jr. , & Jordan, J. A. (1992). A dyadic protocol for training complex skills. Human Factors, 34, 369–374.

16.

Sutter, E. G. , & Reid, J. B. (1969). Learner variables and interpersonal conditions in computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 60, 153–157.